Opinions on M&P 9 vs Glock 9

[howard829]

I have been on the fence lately about purchasing an M&P 9 FS or a .40. Today I had a chance to fire both at my LGS. Unfortunately the two guns were made by Glock. The Glocks were the Polymer style similar to the M&P's. My question is...would there be any difference in the recoil or general feel of the M&P vs the Glock? Since this was my first impression of the 9 and the 40, I will say the .40 had quite a kick to it. Probably more than I would like to be honest. I presently have an M&P 22. Any comments would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Howard

 

[Nevadadvx]

I just replaced my Glock 19 Gen4, with an M&P 9 full size. In my particular case, I had an issue with the Glock grip. In a panic situation, I always aimed high after drawing from a holster. The Glocks are fine pistols to be sure, but don't fit everyone because of their grip angle.

I really like how easy Glocks are to take down, plus you can put any 9mm mag in the baby Glock G26, which I also have. I even have a 33 rounder that will work in my G26 or the G19 I had.

That all said, I REALLY love the ergonomics of the M&P, and I shoot better with it because of it. I am currently trying to find a Shield to replace the G26. As far as recoil, the G19 or M&P are not excessive in 9mm, very easy to handle. You really need to handle both of them and see which one fits you best.

I also recently got an M&P 22 and love it, which was my main reason for replacing the G19. I love the feel of the 22, and the 9mm is almost identical in size and ergonomics. The 22 is a bit lighter is about the only difference.

 

[pazzo]

The MP40 is one soft shooting .40. Much more so than the G23 Gen4. Not sure about the G22.

 

[mgo]

The main reason I prefer the S&W M&P over the Glock is shooting comfort. I get a pretty unpleasant "trigger slap" when firing the Glock which results in a sore trigger finger for a few days. The S&W trigger has a smooth trigger face and does not cause discomfort. I need to add that the optional S&W thumb safety allows for safer holstering; a big item for me when putting the pistol on for carry.

 

[2tango2]

I own a Glock 19 and 26 and find that my FS9 and Shield shoot softer than the Glocks.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

 

[BobC357]

The M&P has been referred to as the "Comfortable Glock". I went with the M&P.

 

[treiz]

I've had both Glocks and M&Ps and while both are excellent guns I prefer the M&P for its ergonomics and the fact that it shoots smoother. I would stick with the 9mm, the 40 isn't worth the decreased mag capacity and it's less controllable than 9mm.

 

[howard829]

Thanks for the replies and comments. When I was looking for a gun, the look and feel of the M&P really had me convinced it was what I wanted. I enjoy the M&P 22 I have and I'm sure I'll be very satisfied with the 9 as well.

Since my .22 has the "thumb safety" I see no reason to change when going to the 9mm. Are there any pro or cons to the thumb safety? This will be used for home use/some range time.

Thanks...Howard

 

[IMKen]

I've had both Glocks and M&Ps and while both are excellent guns I prefer the M&P for its ergonomics and the fact that it shoots smoother. I would stick with the 9mm, the 40 isn't worth the decreased mag capacity and it's less controllable than 9mm.

I bought a G 26 first, It was a fine gun but just did not fit my hand.
I even thought about having a grip job done on it.
Instead I sold it and bought a M&P 9c.
It fits my hand just right, and is every bit a good as the Glock.

 

[fdw]

I rented the glock 9mm when trying to decide between the glock and smith. But the m&p felt so much better in my hand and I found a pretty good price on a kit with the 3 pads, speed loader, holster, etc. and bough it. I've been very pleased. No regrets.

 

[charger73se]

I have a gen 3 & 4 glock 22. I have them because I'm required to carry one on duty. I just ordered a m&p 40c to carry off duty because the ergonomics are so much better than the glock, plus I'm southpaw so I like the fully ambi pistol. I think both are fine guns. The m&p just fits my hand better. I would love a shield, but s&w didn't feel the need to make it ambi.

 

[danysw]

I have a G19 and G26, M&P9 and M&P9c. All of them are wonderful, the simplicity of the Glocks is outstanding and the stock trigger is IMO better but the ergonomics and accuracy of the M&P are superior.

 

[Harrison]

I have a M&P9 and 45. Both are FS. I also have a GenI and a GenIII Glock 19. I will carry either of the glocks, especially if I think I might have to actually use either one of them. Glock 9mm reliabilty is proven. I can shoot the Glocks just as accurately as the M&Ps and the triggers are much better. I admit the M&P grip is slightly more ergonomic, but the pistol itself is overly complicated compared to the glock. Smith has had problems with the M&P9 regarding accuracy, barrel fit, early unlocking, and a strange twist for the 9mm luger cartridge. I will not comment on the 40S&W. I much prefer the 45acp over the 40, in any pistol.

 

[scattershot]

IMHO, the M&P is what the Glock should have been. Better ergos, better trigger, and a comfortable grip. I have both, and prefer the M&P 40c over the Glock hands down. Get the .40 and a 9mm barrel, and you're covered either way.

 

[DigiRebel]

OP TY for the question! I am hunting for a 9mm for my wife. I've seen a lot of suggestions in favor of the Glock (especially with the 4th gen pistol grip adjustability)

I'd have bought a 19 or 26 straight out the door... except, there isn't one to be had anywhere near me. I chatted with the guy at my LGS today he suggested considering a ruger 9mm (which he was sold out on). They also had a bunch of Smith and Wessons in stock, and no one needs to tell me that S&W is usually a quality product.

Discussion here has me considering M&P over a Glock... how do the ruger 9mms weigh in??

 

[loveMD]

Ruger sr9 or sr9c are good value and Imo worth consideration. Ruger availability is tough right now though. I would rate m&p and glock better but many would not, good American gun.

 

[spad124]

Never could warm up to Glocks. I've tried a few but didn't like the grips. The M&P 9 or .40 has a much more comfortable and secure feeling grip for my hand. One gets used to the trigger if you practice enough.

 

[jajo]

I've had an M&P 9mm full size pistol for about a year. I liked the gun enough that I recently bought a 9mm Shield to carry.

I don't own a Glock. But, I don't understand the comments that the S&W is more complicated than the Glock.

Field strip is simple. The pistol is reliable. I have about 2500 rounds through the FS 9mm with no issues. I've shot various brands and weights of ammo through mine with complete success.

At a price under $500 out the door, it is a reliable gun and good value. I couldn't have asked for more.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

 

[Masterorion9]

If you can afford it I say get both. I love my M&P9 FS, especially after putting another $200 in it to get it exactly the way I want. The ergos are phenomenal and the Apex Tactical trigger makes it a dream to shoot, especially rapid fire. I even put in a Costa Catalyst b/c my thumbs don't quite reach w/o breaking grip. It is always the first gun I pick up to shoot, and the last. That being said...

I love my Glock 19 gen 2. At first I wasn't sure I'd made the right decision to trade my SAA for it. And instead of buying an expensive trigger kit I bought some Flitz and started polishing the trigger bar. It was better but hated the grooved trigger so I replaced it with a G17 trigger and polished that up. Hate to admit it but I'm more accurate with this gun than my M&P9. Despite the ungainly grip circumference this is a solid shooter and deserves respect.

 

[highaltitude]

Both are great guns. I looked seriously at the M&P FS and the M&P 9c, but ended up choosing the Glock 19 Gen 4 and really like the gun. For me, the M&P FS was bigger than I wanted and the M&P 9c grip was a bit short for my hand (my Shield fits me better). The G19 offered 15+1 rounds in a relatively tight package. Some people like the grip angle and some don't. I never saw it as an issue and shoot it just fine along with my Shield 9mm.