opinions on the ruger gunsite scout rifle.

[Joe Kent]

Flapjack, sounds like, as the kids would say, a way cool set-up. The various lever guns as I said in an earlier post are some of the handiest and quickest firing guns out there. You obviously thought this out and arrived at a very effective rifle/carbine for it's intended use. If it is not obvious to you, I too am a big lever action fan . I am in the process of setting up a sawed off 45/70 with an extended AO rail and scout scope and red dot for pig hunting.

 

[mjr]

In one of his early writings on the scout rifle concept, Jeff Cooper named the Winchester Model 94 as sort of a precursor of the scout rifle. He also said there was no reason a proper scout couldn't be built on a lever action.

 

[amazingflapjack]

Yeah-the bolt thing just don't make it when you think it through, but then Ruger does not make a center fire lever gun, do they? That's the part that makes sence.

Joe Kent-Whoa borther! I had a 1895 cow boy in that massive Gov't caliber, that should be a freezer filling hog gun! Let us hear how you do. Flapjack.

 

[oldRoger]

I have a newer Savage Scout rifle. 10 round aftermarket magazines are available. Both the Savage & aftermarket magazines have been reliable so far.
The Accu-trigger and Accu-stock seem very sound for what is after all a lower price rifle. I think the trigger is very good out-of-the box.
With see through mounts I can use both sights and I have zeroed the iron at 100 yards and the scope at 200.
It was easy enough to add the third sling swivel.
I have been shooting off-hand so I am not ready to pronounce on accuracy.

I think the Ruger Barrel is too short for a .308, but opinions make for horse races.

 

[Ron H.]

Dear, s&w forum i am seeking opinions from my fellow forum members about the ruger gunsite scout rifle. The reason i am asking about it is because i am thinking about buying one. sincerely and respectfully mg357 a proud member of the s&w forum.

Sir, FWIW, it's not something I would buy. I like the idea of a handy little .308 bolt gun, but I'd set it up somewhat differently than the Ruger.

Things I like about the Ruger are its protected iron sights, laminate stock, adjustable length of pull, and controlled round feed. And just the concept of a light, handy bolt gun.

Things I'd change would start with a longer barrel, at least 18 inches if not 20. I'd also rather have a stripper clip guide than a detachable box magazine. The flash suppressor can go away, as can the Picatinny rail. I would not want a scope on such a gun, but rather a good 1-MOA adjustable rear sight. It would also be nice to have a trap under the buttplate for cleaning gear.

The resulting rifle would be a little longer than the Ruger, but still quite handy, especially since it wouldn't be encumbered with a scope. It would kick less and be a bit quieter because of the longer barrel. It could still be reloaded quickly, but without a big box mag getting in the way. It would be just as handy as a .30-30 carbine, perhaps not as fast to cycle, but more powerful and flatter shooting.

I'd think such a rifle would make a great working gun for a rancher, ranger, guide, or most any sort of woods bum.

JMHO, FWIW.

Hope this helps, and Semper Fi.

Ron H.

 

[8thring]

ruger

I'm primarily a Ruger guy, but I just don't get this rifle. It's got to be the ugliest and most awkward looking rifle currently made. And I don't get the niche it is supposed to fill. To each his own I suppose. Being a Ruger, I'm sure it's rugged and reliable.

it certainly is butt ugly. for that money would get an ar 15.

 

[Joe Kent]

8thring, while I too like and have AR's , they are not in the same general usage of the Scout Rifle concept. Perhaps the .30 Caliber AR's would qualify, but not the 5.56 versions. I am reminded of Springfield Armory's ad,{ one which I am sure other oldtimers would agree} " Bring Enough Gun". All of the guns mentioned, however, have valid uses, just not the same. Take care, Joe.

 

[cwo4uscgret]

So then this DPMS AP4 in .308 would qualify then?

With the EOTECH it is very accurate.....

 

[all357mag]

Not a Ruger fan. That aside, the idea for this rifle is useless. A scope in front of the action is a terrible design. Get a regular configured rifle and don't look back!

 

[Muley Gil]

Not a Ruger fan. That aside, the idea for this rifle is useless. A scope in front of the action is a terrible design. Get a regular configured rifle and don't look back!

Have you ever shot a rifle set up with a forward mounted scope? I was a bit skepical myself until I shot one.

 

[TANKER]

My scout rifle is a Win 94 AE no safety trapper carbine in 30-30 with a 1.5-5x20 VXIII mounted in the normal position. A joy to carry and adequate for any game around here. I missed a deer once because my normally mounted scope fogged up from my breath on cold winters day, but I still use 'em that way. I figure that's just the breaks of the game. I've had really accurate Rugers and some not so good, same as the Remingtons I've owned. You pay your money and take your chances, just like most things in life.