... It's not the same one as shown on that Gun Digest however. That one has flattened barrel sides...
"Flattened barrel sides"???
Do you mean like this...?
... if so, we will have to agree to disagree - the sides of the barrel are not flattened on the gun in the Gun Digest photo. I'm not aware of the factory flattening the barrel sides on some of its offerings until the 1990s. That Gun Digest photo is taken sometime before the gun was 100% assembled (no rear sight) and rotation of the cylinder is different in the two photos (note that the engraving pattern is mirrored on every other charging chamber and the cylinder is stopped in a different position with the Gun Digest photo having it stopped on an "even" and my photo having it stopped on an "odd"). The photo angle, the lighting, and graininess of an old B&W photo make the Gun Digest photo much more two dimensional, also adding to the comparison complexity. The two photos were taken from slightly different angles, which is one of the main complicating factors in the comparison, and the gun is sporting different grips in the two photos which also contributes to the comparison challenge. But, I'm 82.675% sure that it is the same gun.

My reasons for the 17.325% uncertainty is due to a couple of areas in the engraving pattern itself, where the GD photo is not very clear, making it tough for me to confirm 100%.
I have a photo from another engraved S&W collector (one of the leading S&W experts on engraving) of Russ Smith in his house and, what I believe is the Gun Digest Photo, framed in the background. Both he and I believe it is the same gun.
Regardless, I appreciate Karl posting the GD photo so that a comparison could be made. It has been a fun exercise.
