Palosi and her problem with Air Force

george minze

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2008
Messages
2,421
Reaction score
1,472
Location
Jefferson City Mo.
Nancy baby seems to be having a problem with her constant requests for a AF plane to haul her sorry butt around in. This is part of the change? I guess Reid will want to requisition a set of....from the military next, along with a voice. Nevada I can't believe they elected him. Must have been one heck of a Vegas turn out. San Francisco what do you expect from them.
 
Register to hide this ad
Nancy baby seems to be having a problem with her constant requests for a AF plane to haul her sorry butt around in. This is part of the change? I guess Reid will want to requisition a set of....from the military next, along with a voice. Nevada I can't believe they elected him. Must have been one heck of a Vegas turn out. San Francisco what do you expect from them.
 
I heard that this morning on the radio. IIRC, it costs $35,000 for her trip back to SF. And, she's complaining that she needs a larger airplane; one with a private bed, etc. The dems no doubt are sending all of us a signal. He won! We are in charge, so get use to it.
icon_mad.gif
 
I think she needs to do what she told the Big Three auto executives to do . . . FLY COMMERCIAL!

Then maybe she could get the real pulse of what was up!
 
I would be willing to use tax funds to buy an 883 Harley-Davidson Sportser for the use of every member of the House and the Senate in order that they can get back home to stay in touch with their constituencies. No other taxpayer money to be spent to ferry them around with. They pay the gas. No upgrades to the vehicle allowed, no matter at whose expense.
 
I would like to see the following figures:
[1] What Palosi's flights have cost the tax-payers?
[2] What the same flights would have cost on a commerical air line?
[3] Who and their position, went on these Air Force Flights?
 
Originally posted by george minze:
Nancy baby seems to be having a problem with her constant requests for a AF plane to haul her sorry butt around in. This is part of the change?

Really? Got an actual cite for these alleged "constant requests?"

Those seeking a reality check - on this and internet rumors and allegations generally - may wish to go here:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/pelosi/jet.asp

I bookmarked Snopes to check such stories quickly.
 
Originally posted by MADISON:
I would like to see the following figures:
[1] What Palosi's flights have cost the tax-payers?
[2] What the same flights would have cost on a commerical air line?
[3] Who and their position, went on these Air Force Flights?

Here it is, down to family members, bodyguards and ranks of Air Force "escorts" who accompany her on each flight.

Hell, they send a high ranking miliatry physician on her overseas flights! Admirals and such.
icon_rolleyes.gif


COSTS?

Dunno, but it would be fairly simple (though not fast or easy) to come up for expenses for operating the C-20, C-37, C-40 and the BIG A.F. plane she's used in the following report:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/d...ocuments_12_2008.pdf

T.

The $30,000,000 C-20 by Gulfstream, in civilian attire in photo:
300px-Gulfstream_G-400.jpg


The 37 million dollar Gulfstream C-37 - It carries 41,000 pounds of fuel, for a range of 6,750 nautical miles.
300px-Gulfstream.g550.cs-dkf.climb.arp.jpg


The C-40B, that they "had" to let her use since the "little" Gulfstreams were all being used. Yep . . . a Boeing 737 in military garb.
300px-C-40B_USAF_VIP_Transport.jpg
 
I don’t care if she wants to use a hot air balloon, flying her back and forth at tax payers expense weekly is excessive.

Is it really unreasonable to expect that she, and others, use commercial air? They used to right? Seems like standing in line at the airport would help to self limit how many trips home the royalty would make.

Emory
 
Isn't this precisely the sort of thing that the Dems berate the Republicans for doing?

Damned hypocrites...


T-Star
 
Snopes isn't terribly reliable when it comes to information regarding political issues.
 
Originally posted by Amici:
Originally posted by george minze:
Nancy baby seems to be having a problem with her constant requests for a AF plane to haul her sorry butt around in. This is part of the change?

Really? Got an actual cite for these alleged "constant requests?"

Those seeking a reality check - on this and internet rumors and allegations generally - may wish to go here:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/pelosi/jet.asp

I bookmarked Snopes to check such stories quickly.

It was on the news this AM, CNN and Fox. Makes little difference to me. They all are cheats. I have never thought term limits were any good you have to get rid of the good to get rid of the bad. Maybe that's what it will take. How could they be any worse. don't tell me experience while Obama is now in charge of every thing. Community organizer ? What is that?
 
Based on what you guys say about her, Obama, and Biden, I'm willing to fund my percentage of the tax dollars so she doesn't have to stop for fuel enroute to and from California.

For security reasons.

She's next in line after Obama and Biden. That's the reason given for the bigger plane.

She needs protection from terrorist attacks. Based on what you guys say, possibly even domestic terrorists.

She says she'd be happy with a small jet, so long as it has the range. Most of the time, since the headwinds aren't too bad, she goes in the C20.
 
I would be willing to use tax funds to buy an 883 Harley-Davidson Sportser for the use of every member of the House and the Senate in order that they can get back home to stay in touch with their constituencies.

Would the 883's be hard-tails, I hope?
 
She's next in line after Obama and Biden. That's the reason given for the bigger plane.

She needs protection from terrorist attacks. Based on what you guys say, possibly even domestic terrorists.

There you go; ruining a perfectly fine thread with facts and logic.

Have you no shame, sir? Have you NO shame?


Note to OP: It's Pelosi; not "Palosi."
 
Originally posted by glypnir:
Based on what you guys say about her, Obama, and Biden, I'm willing to fund my percentage of the tax dollars so she doesn't have to stop for fuel enroute to and from California.

For security reasons.

She's next in line after Obama and Biden. That's the reason given for the bigger plane.

She needs protection from terrorist attacks. Based on what you guys say, possibly even domestic terrorists.

She says she'd be happy with a small jet, so long as it has the range. Most of the time, since the headwinds aren't too bad, she goes in the C20.

Nonsense. Personally, I couldn't care less what she flies on, but the no refuelling stop argument is a red herring. By that logic, she should spend her public life in an underground bunker. I'm certain that she would be safer sitting on her butt in the Gulfstream while it's being refueled at an AF base (or any civil airport capable of handling the aircraft), than she is shaking hands at a fundraiser in California.
 
Back
Top