PARTES DE UN REVOLVER
- Thread starter GOLDOT
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2007
- Messages
- 27,669
- Reaction score
- 21,349
"Dear (Forum members), I would like to know that part or piece of a revolver (that) suffers the most damage from the recoil - the frame at its top, under the forging cone, or its back. Thank you very much."
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2007
- Messages
- 27,669
- Reaction score
- 21,349
El uso de un programa de traducción de español a inglés es muy útil. 
Talvez puedes intentarlo nuevamente...de espanol para ingles.
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2007
- Messages
- 27,669
- Reaction score
- 21,349
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2007
- Messages
- 27,669
- Reaction score
- 21,349
I think the rear of the barrel of a revolver withstands the most force, from the impact of the bullet. The pressure of firing is contained by the cylinder but some of this is directed to the rear, on the recoil shield.
The top strap has some of the very hot gas from firing directed against it but it has less force placed against it than other parts of the gun. Recall many early revolvers have no top strap and function well, but are not as strong as guns with one.
"Creo que la parte trasera del cañón de un revólver resiste la mayor fuerza. por el impacto de la bala. La presión de disparo está contenida por el cilindro, pero parte de esto se dirige a la parte trasera, en el escudo de retroceso.
La correa superior tiene parte del gas muy caliente de disparar dirigido en su contra, pero tiene menos fuerza colocada contra ella que otras partes del arma. Recuerde que muchos revólveres tempranos no tienen correa superior y funcionan bien, pero no son tan fuertes como las pistolas con uno."
The top strap has some of the very hot gas from firing directed against it but it has less force placed against it than other parts of the gun. Recall many early revolvers have no top strap and function well, but are not as strong as guns with one.
"Creo que la parte trasera del cañón de un revólver resiste la mayor fuerza. por el impacto de la bala. La presión de disparo está contenida por el cilindro, pero parte de esto se dirige a la parte trasera, en el escudo de retroceso.
La correa superior tiene parte del gas muy caliente de disparar dirigido en su contra, pero tiene menos fuerza colocada contra ella que otras partes del arma. Recuerde que muchos revólveres tempranos no tienen correa superior y funcionan bien, pero no son tan fuertes como las pistolas con uno."
Ninguno parte que ha nombrado. El "forcing cone" puede sufrir dano desde tiempo con una bala ligera y mucha polvera pero no a causa del retroceso. Y tambien la mano puede sufrir dano desde tiempo con mucho uso, pero no a causa del retroceso.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry, I used the online translator as well. Try me out in French sometime.
No, no, that was for him. Both a and para mean the same in that case.
I'd answer if I knew for sure. I suspect it's the crane or whatever locates or secures the cylinder in the correct place, to be the part that bears the grunt of the recoil. As Radny97 has pointed out, the forcing cone damage is due to heat, and I believe pressure, from the ammo itself.
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2007
- Messages
- 27,669
- Reaction score
- 21,349
That makes sense on a practical level; heavy revolver use results in "endshake" on the yoke barrel, and does not increase movement/wear on the cylinder itself.
With due respect, I believe your question has been answered by none other than a moderator of the forum. A revolver that has seen heavy use, may develop "endshake," which is excessive forward and rearward movement of the cylinder caused by the yoke barrel. I'm not exactly sure what a yoke barrel is but, from the name, suspect it's the tubular section connected to the top of the yoke, in which the extractor rod rides. I have read of two or three different ways to correct endshake, and will try to link the easiest one below.
I hope the info. is of use.
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JII__KNLYY0[/ame]
