olivehead1
Member
Picked this up last week after it had been out for a couple days. Doesn't look to have been shot much, just a bit of holster wear. Locks up tight.
Based on the Blue Book, I'd say it's maybe 90%, although some say more like 85%. I'm just going by the BBGV photo grading, which pictures a Ruger Single Six rated at 90% with some "pitting, freckling, finish discoloration," chipping on the trigger guard "certainly not indicative of normal wear," and "pitting and metal discoloration on the fame, hammer, and loading gate," none of which is present on this Python. The additional wear on the cylinder vs. the frame and barrel would keep this gun from as high as 95%, but I'd still say a solid 90%. I guess in the end it doesn't matter.
Cost me about the average going rate for a new production blued 4" Python, with the 3 vents on the barrel rib--I just can't get over that decision by Colt, especially since they'd already put out the stainless with the correct 2 vents.
Based on the Blue Book, I'd say it's maybe 90%, although some say more like 85%. I'm just going by the BBGV photo grading, which pictures a Ruger Single Six rated at 90% with some "pitting, freckling, finish discoloration," chipping on the trigger guard "certainly not indicative of normal wear," and "pitting and metal discoloration on the fame, hammer, and loading gate," none of which is present on this Python. The additional wear on the cylinder vs. the frame and barrel would keep this gun from as high as 95%, but I'd still say a solid 90%. I guess in the end it doesn't matter.
Cost me about the average going rate for a new production blued 4" Python, with the 3 vents on the barrel rib--I just can't get over that decision by Colt, especially since they'd already put out the stainless with the correct 2 vents.