Mine was No. 32. And, I didn’t get anything like that amount either. But, it’s hard to say, really, because I traded it for another gun that I believe was overpriced.I'd could have gone all day without seeing what the one on GB sold for.
I don't remember what I sold mine for but I doubt it was half that.
I'm glad for the seller.
I bought mine new at retail from a LGS in 1992 or 1993, for something a bit over $1,100.00. The seemingly astonishing price recently paid for the higher numbered specimen on GB, above, didn’t even keep up with inflation. So, you gotta realize that it’s in Biden Dollars; not like it’s real money.I think perhaps you guys are unfamiliar with the S&W PC market.
I paid more than that for many of my PC guns. And in the case of my PPC-9, I paid significantly more than that a decade ago to get it.
I own a standard 4006 that I bought used. Very first round out of it went dead center of the x. Why mess with success when standard ones are cheaper and just about as accurate as the shooter is going to be with either a standard or a PC one.My Performance Center long slide 4006 finally got booted outa the nest because it didn’t shoot enough better than my standard 4006, with its aftermarket Bar-Sto barrel and MMC sights:
View attachment 764131
This target was shot two hands standing at 50 feet, with the pistol’s hammer lowered between shots so that each shot was fired double action. With a carrying pistol, it’s where the first shot goes that’s most important. So, this target shows like five first shots.
That Winchester 155gr. SilverTip ammo chronographed at 1,200 fps from this pistol. Seems like enough for most purposes.