Picked up a 639

Below is a partial gathering of my S&W "39 family," pictured: (top, left to right) a "No" and a 39; (middle, L to R) 39-2 and 439; and, (bottom) a 539 and 639. (The below is stored originally in my S&W Forum pictures album where, one supposes, the images can be manipulated a little better to see more detail).

dcw-albums-family-pics-picture11774t-top-left-right-no-39-39-middle-l-r-39-2-439-bottom-539-639.jpg


dcw-albums-family-pics-picture11776-upper-row-l-r-no-39-39-middle-row-l-r-39-2-439-bottom-l-r-539-639.jpg



What's the difference between his 639 and my 539 I bought? Mine is as clean as his (I'll post pictures when I get it Monday) New York makes you amend your permit which takes about a week. I got it because I could no longer safely hold my .44 due to recoil, and the shop owner recommended the 539 because the weight would lessen the recoil. Anyone know what the recoil is like?

"What the recoil is like?" Very controllable, especially as compared to a .44..

539 v. 639 differences:

Production - The 539 was made over about a two-year period (1981-1983); about 8,300 produced, according to the Blue Book of Gun Values. The 639's introduction overlapped a little, 1982-1983, but production lasted about six years until 1988.

Finishes - The all-steel 539 was available in blue and nickel finishes; the 639 in all-stainless steel, only.

Action - The 539 is a double action (DA), only, whereas the 639 opens with DA, goes to single action (SA) following a fired first round; generally expressed as DA/SA. The 639 is DA/SA, only.

Capacities - The 539 and 639 are 8+1; eight rounds in a single-column magazine (cartridges are stacked one directly above another) plus one round in the chamber.

Key Notes:
Please remember that Smith and Wesson served customers and thus would "personalize" guns to the extent allowed. Thus, while S&W produced standardized product lines, within limits it also produced, well, what the customer wanted. Such is one reason for "The Box" (usually silver-on-blue or the reverse for nickel-plated guns) being important to some folks, usually collectors, because on it was a label on the box that told most, if not all, about the making of the gun within.

The 539 and 639 series are considered second-generation S&W guns. The 639 was produced with ambidextrous safety levers (at the slide's rear) for the final two years (86-88) of production; left-side-only for the 539 (but for which a customer could special-order left and right levers). Both were produced having single and adjustable sites: The 539 had a very short run of fixed-sight slides and are considered rare; the 639 had both types of sights, but those having adjustable sights are slightly more desirable on that model.

Should the first- and second-generation "39s" have an Achilles Heel it would be the extractor. Thus seen in the first-and-second generation guns were three types: long, medium and short (brilliant, huh?). The "long" is most easily seen in the Model 39. The medium in the 39-2 and the "short-wide" is something you want to hold onto, in whatever S&W. Of its roughly 8,000-gun production a couple-hundred-or-so 539s (like its double-column sister 559) were produced with the short-wide extractor before production returned to use of the 39-2, or medium-length style. Similar production numbers reportedly exist for the 639. An example of the short-wide extractor is seen pictured on the lower-left 539 and in the middle row on the right-side 439.
 
Last edited:
DCW, I have to disagree with your statement that the 539 is double action (only), as all three second gen 39s, the 439, 539, and 639 are all traditional double action, they all function exactly the same, the only difference is in the material used for the frames/slides. Double action only semi autos were not introduced until the third gen pistol line was released, and not right away... Nice 39 collection, BTW...
 
Last edited:
M-39, M-52 & M639

I noticed on another Forum that the question was asked as to whether the Grips would interchange for these models, no one has offered a reply and I'm also curious if someone is willing to share.


My excuse is that I'm old and been mostly a revolver person so am dumber when it comes to semi-autos!

I do thank you though.
 
Last edited:
A 39 is not a ambi safety gun, were as 639 has a ambi safety as doe's the 539 and 439 . 39 grips will fit on a 639 but the safety will hit the grip on the right side. 6/5/439 grips have a cut out on the right grip to clear the safety lever . left side grips are the same . Here's a few pics of one of mine with 39 grips on it and one not so good pic of it stock. Hope this helps
 

Attachments

  • 002.jpg
    002.jpg
    129.3 KB · Views: 43
  • 003.jpg
    003.jpg
    125.7 KB · Views: 40
  • 39.JPG
    39.JPG
    122.6 KB · Views: 42
Got one 639 in perfect condition, like to sell with the original box...
qa8ybavu.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I have a 639 that I bought new around 1983 or 1984 when I had an FFL. In those days a $30 permit fee and two pages of paperwork were all you needed to get an FFL.

Mine does not have the left-handed safety on it. I've shot a total of maybe 250 rds thru mine; I think it went about 25 years without being fired at all. Wish I'd kept the original box, but in those days it did not seem important.
 
I bought this one from the original owner just a couple years after he bought it new, he had replaced the original sight with an adjustable one, but fortunately the original was still in the box when I bought it. Still have it, and I always managed to keep the boxes, thank goodness....
 

Attachments

  • 20120826_113550.jpg
    20120826_113550.jpg
    251.2 KB · Views: 30
  • 20120826_113422.jpg
    20120826_113422.jpg
    242.6 KB · Views: 34
  • 20120826_113806.jpg
    20120826_113806.jpg
    208 KB · Views: 29
DCW, I have to disagree with your statement that the 539 is double action (only), as all three second gen 39s, the 439, 539, and 639 are all traditional double action, they all function exactly the same, the only difference is in the material used for the frames/slides. Double action only semi autos were not introduced until the third gen pistol line was released, and not right away... Nice 39 collection, BTW...


My 539 is DA/SA just like my 39-2's and 39.

 
A great find. Mine is one of only three handguns I have bought NIB. How is the trigger pull on yours. Mine has a very light and smooth trigger pull, the DA pull actually feels lighter than the SA pull.
 
Found its twin in a pawn shop today slightly newer at A841347 ,
I was surprised when turned it over and found the same left hand safety lever because I remember seeing these new back in the 80's without the right side lever.

Pulled all the 39-2's and 539 out of the safe to compare but none have the relieved right grip panel and without the relieved panel cant use the safety.
Appears your backstrap is also aluminum which kinda surprised me.
 
Pulled all the 39-2's and 539 out of the safe to compare but none have the relieved right grip panel and without the relieved panel cant use the safety.
Appears your backstrap is also aluminum which kinda surprised me.

All 639s have an aluminum backstrap. There were a few model 39s with steel backstraps, but it's very rare to see one, the vast majority had anodized aluminum backstraps. Here are the different right grip panels, it just depended on whether you ordered the ambi safety or not.
 

Attachments

  • PB140026.jpg
    PB140026.jpg
    86.6 KB · Views: 30
  • 20120826_113352.jpg
    20120826_113352.jpg
    73.9 KB · Views: 27
Last edited:
I knew the 39,39-2, 439 and 539 had aluminum backstraps but always assumed the 639 was SS until today.

Strange that S&W didnt offer a 639 slide with the aluminum frame .
 
Back
Top