This has been kind of interesting. I always try to figure out where a poster is coming from when they make a request for info like this. What I've found is it's usually because what they're planning to do is outside of their comfort level or level of expertise.
I'm glad that Mr. Goudy has dropped the .22 idea. This is 2022, and there are an infinite number of choices that will run rings around a .22 in performance. Not to mention, the sort of people that one might run into as an adversary these days tend to have one or more substances on board, and most of those things tend to render the user numb to injuries that might stop a sober person. a small round like a .22 may not register at all, considering the times where getting hit with a 9, 40 or 45 didn't faze them!
I'm not sure why a large gun like a 686 would be in consideration, either. Any rig that will serve to conceal a gun that big might be comfortable for a couple of hours, but having carried a 686 as a duty gun many years ago, I can tell you I still remember that it was a real chore to carry day in and day out. I was thrilled to be able to switch to a Model 669 after toting that brick for a while. I'm certain the L frame contributed to my lower back problems that I have to this day.
I hope you'll consider a semi-auto in spite of the reluctance you've mentioned here. First of all, forget anything you've read or heard about reliability. The majority of those are either internet legends or just plain wrong. A semi is as reliable as you are at taking care of it, and by that I mean doing the basic stuff like cleaning and oiling when needed. You don't even need to tear it down to the bare bones, either.
I agree, the Glock form is not for everyone. I hate them, personally, so I don't even try to use one. Plenty of other choices out there!
Bottom line: go to any range that rents guns and try one or two. Getting familiar with each one's controls, loading, and best grip to use will tell you a lot more about whether or not a particular gun will work for you.
By the way: if the range also rents the Ruger LCR 9mm, give it a try. Some folks say that the 9 in a revolver has some pretty snappy recoil and they don't shoot more than a cylinder or two at a time. See for yourself.
Anyway, I wish you luck and hope your journey is successful.
Thanks for the detailed post, having a 686 as my only handgun I can fully relate to the brick analogy. Can it be carried? Absolutely. Is it enjoyable? Absolutely not and a pain to dress around. Unless it's winter and I'm wearing a puffy coat I have to plan everything around it. During summer tall size Hawaiian shirts have done the trick but even that is not ideal. I also can relate to the back pain and I don't even carry it for more than a few hours at a time.
I wish I had a gun store that let me shoot, the only experience I have with autoloaders is friends letting me try theirs. Where I live the nearest store other than LGS is about a two hour round trip . What I do know is I hate the Glock grip so muchso that is a start. While I prefer revolvers I'd be open to a quality semi.
The one semi auto I really liked that I held in store was a SIG P365. Felt premium, loved the grip, and felt the texture of it made it easy to get a good grip on it. Of all the semi autos it just made the most sense to me, if that makes any senseeverything was in a place that made it easier to operate than other semis I have held. The only other than came close was the Glock 43 with longer magazine so I could get my pinky on it as I have large hands. I still hated the angle of the grip but everything else on the 43 was nice. That was my only knock on the SIG was I couldn't get my pinky on the grip and I like having a full grip, which is why I love the LCR grip so much and the extended grip on the 43 at LGS.
@Goudy,
I have to second the Sig P365. I have both the Nitron 9mm and Nitron 380. I have been shooting and carrying the 9mm for a few years. This past summer I had occasion to pocket carry my G42 and discovered that the G42 and the P365 had the same footprint.
The only problem I encountered was drawing the 9mm (which has a manual safety), it seemed to take a little longer. When I purchased the 365-380, I picked it up without the manual safety. With the onset of neuropathy, I am finding the 380 a little easier to shoot. I am intrigued by the SAS, but not enough to purchase one. My ophthalmologist has the SAS, but doesn't like it, for him, it won't shoot to the sights.
I'd give both chamberings of the P365 serious consideration. Ten plus one of either 9mm round will be effective at bad breath distance!
I wonder if folks here that carry a Sig 365 pocket carry it or have it on a belt/holster setup. Just me, but it seems like the lint and fuzz that gets in your pockets would have a tendency to possibly jam a semi-auto.
My answer to the problem was the Airweight J-frame 351c, 7 shots, 22 magnum. It weighs about 11oz and the recoil is minimal. There is also the S&W 43c, 8 shots, .22lr.
They are a dream to carry, practicing will not punish your hand and would be very effective at getting rounds into the target quickly.
i would never carry anything i couldn't reliably make 50+ yard shots with. so super micro compact "pocket guns" are out of the picture.
shield is about as small as i'm comfortable with.
...
Thanksgiving Update: Smith and Wesson M&P edges out the Glock 43 for finalist slot. Final 3 to research are SIG P365 in 9mm, Ruger LCR 357 magnum, and M&P Shield 9mm
Thanksgiving Update: Smith and Wesson M&P edges out the Glock 43 for finalist slot. Final 3 to research are SIG P365 in 9mm, Ruger LCR 357 magnum, and M&P Shield 9mm
i would never carry anything i couldn't reliably make 50+ yard shots with. so super micro compact "pocket guns" are out of the picture.
shield is about as small as i'm comfortable with.