Poll..."Is a 3 inch revolver barrel a snubnose?"

OK, just to be different, here's my thinking: look at the gun from the side - if the distance from the front of the cylinder to the muzzle is shorter than the distance from the rear of the cylinder to the rear of the backstrap, it's a snubby. If the cylinder-muzzle distance is the same or longer, it ain't a snubby.

Yeah, yeah, I know - I'm weird....
 
2. No, 3 is too long to be a snubby IMO. And I don't think any L, N, or X frame should be called a snubby regardless of how short the barrel is. Well,maybe I would consider the 2.5" 686 a snubby, I don't know. It's still a pretty chunky piece. Like someone's already said, a snubby should drop into a front pocket.
 
no.
too bad you did not set it up as a poll, but I think the nays have it by a wide margin.
 
I know of no scientific evidence to support the question one way or another.

I do have personal experience hitting within the nine ring of a 25 yard target with regularity using a 3" barrel revolver.

Shooting a revolver with a shorter barrel I have trouble hitting the 25 yard target.

Thus the answer to me is that a 3" barrel is not a snubby.
 
3 inch snubbie

For my 2 cents worth, I vote yes that a 3 inch can be classified as a snubbie. Michael deBethencourt, one of the top snub instructors in the U.S. list as a criteria for attending one of his snub classes is a revolver 3 inches or less. So based on that, I would say deBethencourt feels that a 3 inch revolver is classified as a snub and I tend to agree with him. See his web site @
Snub Tactics, Tips, and Tricks
 
No, a 3" barrel is not a snubby, it's a short barrel, but not a snubby...
 
According to the Snubbies files, Yes:

"The Colt Detective Special was an American DA/SA revolver first produced in 1927 as a shortened version of the Police Positive Special handgun. It was designed for ease of carry and concealment. It proved very popular and over 1.5 million were produced in several models by the time production finally ended in 1986. Though originally offered in .32 caliber, the most common of the Colt Detective Specials were chambered for the .38 Special cartridge fed from a 6-shot cylinder and had a 2-inch barrel. (Some models with 3-inch barrels can also be found.) It is a classic-style, swing out cylinder, double action compact revolver with fixed blade front sight and notch-style rear sights and full length ejector rod. The cylinder rotates clockwise, unlike Smith & Wesson revolvers. The Detective Special models were also available in other calibers.

The gun first became popular [in 1926] after J. H. FitzGerald, a Colt shooter, began to cut the Police Positive guns down to two inches for use as belly guns. In fact, FitzGerald went even further and bobbed the hammerspurs and cut out the front of the trigger guards in an attempt to make a real speed gun. They called them FitzGerald Specials, and many savvy gunmen preferred them for fighting guns."
 
I know of no scientific evidence to support the question one way or another.

I do have personal experience hitting within the nine ring of a 25 yard target with regularity using a 3" barrel revolver.

Shooting a revolver with a shorter barrel I have trouble hitting the 25 yard target.

Thus the answer to me is that a 3" barrel is not a snubby.

So does that translate into, any gun that I can't hit my target with is a snubby?
 
Last edited:
I haven't read all 10 pages of posts, but I suspect that everybody will agree that a 2" gun is a snubby, and a 4" gun is not. Exactly where the line between the two lies is the argument.

I'd argue 2" and less is a snubby....
4" and longer is full sized.

Anything in between is a belly gun.

That's my two cents - Josh M - Charter Member - Belly Gunners Anonymous.
 
Back
Top