Primary Arms Advanced Micro Dot- MD-ADS

Rastoff

US Veteran
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
14,710
Reaction score
17,101
Location
So Cal (Near Edwards AFB)
If you've seen my other thread, you know I've been threatening to buy one of these and do a review for some time. That time is now. So, get comfortable. This will take a little while and there are a lot of pictures. I promise only one thing, the truth. I have no bias and will only report what I observe. Feel free to respond to this review as you see fit.

One thing you won't see here is the ridiculous "torture" tests. If you want that, there are plenty of videos on youtube. Several are listed on the Primary Arms site. So, if you want to see it frozen, bashed, battered, dragged behind a truck or blown up, go to Primary Arms and click the links there. It's been done enough to show that this is one tough little optic.


I will only list stuff not on the Primary Arms website. You can read all the technical details here: https://www.primaryarms.com/Primary_Arms_Advanced_Micro_Dot_with_Push_Buttons_p/md-ads.htm


The basics:
Price- $169.99 + $4.58 shipping = $174.57 to my door.
Why this optic? I was hoping for a reasonably low priced optic that performed well. For me that means long battery life and clear, undistorted optics. Based on a video posted by another member, I took a chance.

Here it is mounted on my rifle:
Full%20Right%20Side_zps17fsowpn.jpg


I like the low profile and small overall size. It adds very little weight to the gun and doesn't stick out like some cancerous appendage.

I have this one mounted on a 1/2" riser. Mounting closer to the bore makes for more precise aiming qualities. I tried mounting it directly to the receiver, but that was just too low. Co-witnessing is not a big concern for me. I have no plans on going into combat/competition so, instantaneous operation of back up sights is not a high priority. However, with the 1/2" riser the MD-ADS does co-witness with my back up sights. It's kind of a top 1/3rd co-witness. I don't recommend mounting your sight this way, but it will work. (For the record, the back up sights are not sighted in at this time)

Top_zpsbitg7pol.jpg

I find the controls easily accessible and easy to operate. Pressing either button turns the sight on. Pressing both together turns the sight off. I see no reason to ever turn the optic off. With a 50K hour battery life, a single battery will last for 5 years of constant use at a middle setting. So, changing the battery every 2 years should keep it running fine.

Someone questioned if this had an auto shut off; it doesn't. I turned it on as soon as it was out of the box yesterday and it's still on as I type this. I have no intention of turning it off until the battery dies or I reach the two year point.

Windage%20Adjustment_zpsnbzlibwk.jpg

Unlike previous models, the battery is easily accessible from the side. So changing it out will not require removing the optic. When it arrived the battery was already installed. If using the gun for defense, I'd change the battery to a new one just to be sure I started with a full up battery.

Unlike the Vortex SPARC, the adjustments are easy to access and none of the other controls got in the way of using a high tech adjustment tool.
Adjustment_zpsmurwbbuv.jpg


For comparison, here is what the SPARC looked like:
NickelFailsmall_zpsf3ef488d.jpg



The adjustment caps are not attached. This should not present a problem as adjustment should rarely need to be done. I've only had the optic for a day. Whether or not it holds zero remains to be seen. At first I thought they were plastic. It turns out they are made of aluminum and are quite nice.

The question was asked about how the controls would work with gloves:
Glove%20Operation_zps7t0kjfpo.jpg

I found them easy to operate with a pair of Mechanix gloves. In fact, they are much easier to operate than my EOTech. The buttons on the EOTech are recessed. The buttons on the MD-ADS are not recessed. Only time will tell if this is a detriment. Under normal use I don't see how it could be.


If you wanted to mount a Kill Flash or flip up caps you may be out of luck:
Objective%20Lens_zpskrxnhzvj.jpg

The objective bezel is not threaded and has precious little area to add a slip on device. If anyone knows of a source for either of these that will work on this, please let me know.

That said, the rubber bikini cover is OK:
Cover_zps9zcxo89d.jpg

I find it much easier to install than the cover that came with the SPARC. However, it is indeed a cheap cover and I'd be surprised if it lasts long.


A nit that I just have to pick, the mount screw:
Picking%20Nits_zps8n6inhyo.jpg

This is one cheaply made part. The Torx shape is not well made and doesn't fit well with the supplied wrench. So, yeah, as I was tightening the screw, the wrench slipped and I scratched the optic! I find the finish on this to be very mediocre. It is very easy to mar. For those of you who like that "Boba Fett" look, you'll love this because it will take on a worn appearance quickly. Yes, this is really being picky, but I promised the truth.


Alright, now to the good stuff, shooting. In the end that's all that matters; how good it is at putting hits on target.

I fired 30 rounds at the range today. It took me a little while to get it dialed in, but not that bad. I started by bore sighting the gun to the optic. If you don't know what that is, I will explain later. By doing this, the first three shot group was on a 12"x12" target.

I found the adjustments very positive. Usually on low dollar optics the "clicks" are very spongy. Not this one. Each click is positive and easy to feel.

Once zeroed well enough, I shot this group:
3%20shot%20group_zpsxdebv8u2.jpg

Granted this was at 50 yards, but that's a sub MOA group using an optic with a 2MOA dot. You can't complain about that.

Of course a good group means nothing if you can't repeat it. So, I followed that group with a 4 shot group:
4%20shot%20group_zps3gsugsiy.jpg

Take out the one shot on the left and it's another sub MOA group. Add that shot in and you have a group that's just over 2MOA while using an optic with a 2MOA red dot. This was all done with Wolf Gold ammo and me behind the trigger. That's as good as I'd ever expect and I'm very happy with the groups I got today.


After what I've just talked about, most people would be very happy with this optic. Relatively low price, easy to use, long battery life and seems to have the ability to provide good accuracy. Now we have to explore that oh so mysterious aspect of optics we call parallax.

Accuracy is easy when you're at a range with a bench and sand bags. However, the beauty of the red dot is that it can be accurate when conditions aren't perfect. Because you don't need to be in the physical center of the optic to be on target. In order for this to work, any red dot has to have a low incidence of parallax.

So, I attempted to recreate the nice video Chattanoogaphil made:

Watch it on youtube to see it in a larger size. Look closely at the relationship between the stump and the dot as the camera moves around. Pay no attention to the fence because it's too close. That stump is 50 yards from where the gun is sitting, +/- a yard or so.

Before I comment further, I have a question: the specifications say that this optic is parallax free beyond 33 yards. Do you think this optic meets that spec?


One thing that cannot be denied, I was able to shoot some nice groups with it. In the end, that's all that matters. I will continue to use it and continue to report on how it's working. For what it is, what I intend to use it for and what I paid for it, I'm OK with it. I will look more closely at the parallax stuff. Even so, as long as it continues to help me put rounds on target, I'm happy.
 
Register to hide this ad
Nice review.

Parallax looks fine, about on par with the PAs I have. You've already seen that vid. Here's a vid I just took with an old Tasco PDP2 I had laying round here. Other than the dot going bright and dim on camera angle, the dot barely budges.

What I liked best about your new ADS is the clarity (at least appeared so in the vid) very nice. Maybe you can take a pic up against a white wall? I suspected it would be clearer because they advertised NV capable. I looks like there's quite a difference between yours and the dingy green of my old Tasco in the vid which is about the same as the dingy green on my PAs. It won't make any difference just holding center on a paper bullseye or banging steel, but I do a fair amount of shooting with my 15-22 against a dirt bank popping shot shells and other debris with not so much contrast. Extra clarity will make a big difference for my plinking. That alone would be worth the extra $100.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUoszCis3rA&feature=youtu.be
 
Last edited:
Yes, the clarity is quite nice. It is an aspect I haven't done much comparison with because I have nothing to directly compare it to. Later today I will take some pics and see if I can show clarity.
 
That said, the rubber bikini cover is OK:
Cover_zps9zcxo89d.jpg

I find it much easier to install than the cover that came with the SPARC. However, it is indeed a cheap cover and I'd be surprised if it lasts long.

I've had PA optics for years and had the bikini covers on and off hundreds of times. I'm sure those are the same should last just fine.

Screen%20Shot%202015-02-08%20at%204.36.58%20PM_zpskojwbtvl.png
 
Last edited:
I looks like there's quite a difference between yours and the dingy green of my old Tasco in the vid which is about the same as the dingy green on my PAs.
It turns out that getting a picture of this is harder than I thought it would be. Yes, if I view a white piece of paper through the MD-ADS it does have a slight blue-green cast to it. To me it is very faint and I probably would not have noticed it had you not mentioned the issue with your other PA optics.

In trying to capture a picture, I find it difficult to replicate what I see with my eye. I'm reluctant to post this picture, but here it is:
Clarity_zpssqkamyel.jpg


Obviously there are a lot of factors to consider here. I'm sure your monitor is not the same as mine. So, I don't know if you see what I see. I used a piece of standard white paper. In the pic it probably has a slight grey cast to it. This is due to the lighting. The optic should have a very light blue or blue-green color to it. Yes, it's there, but most people wouldn't notice it at the range or unless they were specifically looking for it.

I'm curious to see how an Aimpoint would fair under similar conditions? I've never done this kind of a test before. My EOTech doesn't have this color cast to it. If anything, the EOTech is just limiting light transmission. There is no color, but it's obvious you're looking through something (if that makes any sense).
 
I've had PA optics for years and had the bikini covers on and off hundreds of times. I'm sure those are the same should last just fine.
That's good to know, but I'll probably be looking for something else anyway. As you can see from my pics, I live in a very dusty area. The rubber of the cover just soaks up dust and it's hard to get off.
 
I just saw this pic from another thread:

Screen%20Shot%202015-02-08%20at%204.11.39%20PM_zpsqu6nts4s.png


Now I wish I had this so I could compare them side by side. Phil's optic looks obviously green to me.
 
It's getting dark out here so there's glare from overhead lights.

My Aimpoint H1 is actually more green than it appears in this photo. Still, the ADS is clearer. No doubt about it.

Screen%20Shot%202015-02-08%20at%206.04.42%20PM_zps9uqprald.png
 
Last edited:
I'm speechless. That just blows me away. I know that small optics like this always have problems with parallax and clarity. Even so, I never expected the MD-ADS would be better than an Aimpoint.

This makes me want to go buy one just so I can compare them side by side. Anyone got $700 or a spare Aimpoint lying around?
 
I just saw this pic from another thread:

Screen%20Shot%202015-02-08%20at%204.11.39%20PM_zpsqu6nts4s.png


Now I wish I had this so I could compare them side by side. Phil's optic looks obviously green to me.

That's the PA optic. Now in that pic it's actually a bit darker than it would otherwise be due to the kill flash I put on it for the photo.
 
I'm speechless. That just blows me away. I know that small optics like this always have problems with parallax and clarity. Even so, I never expected the MD-ADS would be better than an Aimpoint.

This makes me want to go buy one just so I can compare them side by side.

You should. Get the new Aimpoint T2.
 
No, as long as this one keeps working like it is, I see no reason to buy another. At the moment, the minor parallax issue is the only thing about this I'm unhappy with. Most don't even see that as an issue.

Is this an "Aimpoint Killer"? No, I don't think so. People will still pay the big bucks because it's what the military uses (even though they don't use the micro versions). For right now, I see no real advantage to another red dot and I'm really picky. Remember, I'm the guy always trying to talk people out of buying cheap optics. So, this is very unusual for me.
 
Just got mine in the mail. Just upgraded from a utg. I am very happy with it and the 3 x mag and mounts. Need to get to the range and try it out.
cd7aa2e799f92ca1e9ea66f01645ae0a.jpg
30d61a3e2908f12663389270a206e3dd.jpg
8c1cbf96b6c28583b60da91ee3ab6db2.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Chinese optics get different labels slapped on them. Originally Primary Arms was selling them under the Holosun name and still do. Now with a Primary Arms label also. I'm sure you'll find them with many labels.

The Primary Arms Compact 4x I bought a few years ago I have seen with countless other labels, including even Sig Arms.

I think PA got a reputation for selling better budget optics becasue they would inspect them for defects before shipping. They also claim to have some influence with the factory over some design aspects. Marshall was posting on another forum the reticle changes they had requested for a new compact scope. Turned out the factory went a different way. Maybe one day Marshall will post on the Forum and give us the inside scoop.
 
Last edited:
Hello,
It seems to be the same as the Hilux Micro B dot, no ?
It certainly could be. The Hi-Lux does have some differences though:
micro-max_b-dot_right.jpg


The caps are captured and have built in adjustment tools. The battery cap is larger, but that's so it can store an extra battery. This one comes with flip up caps and a kill flash. These are all extras that are very nice and better than the Primary Arms offering. Certainly not hard for a manufacturer to add these based on a particular specification from a retailer. I'm not sure I'd pay an extra $70 for them though.

Still, Phil is right, the factory that makes these could make them for multiple vendors. It's like the Mec Gar mags where they are made by one company, but for many companies.
 
I just looked and found this:
HS403G-3T.jpg


This is the Holosun version of the same thing. Primary Arms has it listed on their site for $199. It has exactly the same specs as the Primary Arms version, but with different adjustment caps. I certainly wouldn't pay an extra $30 just for different caps.

None of this surprises me.
 
Interesting issue with image shift for a 1x optic designed to shoot with both eyes open.
See the significant roofline shift in the Holosun pic.

Holosunimage_zpsladchcih.jpg


T1image_zpseocwctva.jpg
 
Last edited:
How did you get those pics or are they just off the web?

The reason I ask has to do with camera position. Because of the refraction associated with any lens, a tiny shift in camera position could create the roof line differences you're seeing in those pics.
 
Marshall acknowledges the image shift. It's a shrinking image magnification with the glass. I doubt many folks notice. Heck, half or more of the guys I see at the Club use red dots one eye closed anyway.

My Burris FastFire (another supposedly good mid-priced red dot) does the same thing but in reverse, and even worse. I hate it. Funny thing, I ranted about it in a thread where others were giving it glowing reviews. Others hadn't noticed. :rolleyes:

I think they all have some optical image difference, but my Aimpoint and old PAs and decades old Tasco red dots have none perceivable to me. I was thinking about a Holosun, but after those images and reading Marshall acknowledge it, it's not an option for me.
 
Last edited:
I appreciate your write up on this optic, and please update as you see fit. I became an AR owner last year, and have been using it with a LMT carry handle. Although I do enjoy shooting my M&P with the irons, I have been thinking about getting a red dot to help my 56 year old eyes. I only use my AR for fun, and my hunting guns get the good glass, so this PA red dot seems like a good fit. Thanks again for the write up.
 
I've found that taking pictures of optics can be quite challenging. Because the red dot is designed to simulate a dot projected on the target, it's impossible to have the optic housing in focus and the red dot in focus. Because of this, the pictures taken above have to be considered with that in mind.

Let's look at them again:
Holosun%20Distortion_zpsqqhrmlrz.jpg


Aimpoint%20T-1%20distortion_zpshgr6nnsz.jpg


I've added arrows to indicate where the actual red dot is. Notice that the Aimpoint dot is almost off the optic low/left. The Holosun seems to be closer to the middle. I'm not sure about the Holosun though, that could be a reflection rather than a distorted red dot.

Only one conclusion can be drawn from what I'm showing; the pictures were not taken at the same angle with respect to the optic. Because of refraction, this is important to any refraction error noted (which is what we're talking about when looking at the broken roof line).

This kind of picture is quite difficult to set up. It's not enough to just see the roof line the same, the angle of the optic must be the same as well. This means that the photographer must take some time to position each optic (or rifle if it's mounted) not just in the same position, but the same attitude as well.

I will try to replicate a pic like these, using the MD-ADS, soon.
 
I just looked and found this:
HS403G-3T.jpg


This is the Holosun version of the same thing. Primary Arms has it listed on their site for $199. It has exactly the same specs as the Primary Arms version, but with different adjustment caps. I certainly wouldn't pay an extra $30 just for different caps.

None of this surprises me.

The Holosun has a few differences - battery location, auto-off, and also the emitter is at the 6 o'oclock position instead of 4:30 or so... PA wanted side mounted battery for easier changing, 4:30 emitter b/c the 6pm one interferred with some c/w setups, and they just plain didn't want the auto-off I read - so they asked Holosun to make these changes for their branded version.

I'm torn... just built a new lightweight shorty BCM with Keymod on my ambi lower, and was thinking about trying the new T-2. Ya'll probably remember I had the T-1 on my S&W/Troy build - wound up selling it b/c I though I was going to go with something etched due to my astigmatism, ie ACOG or Leupold Prismatic - but on this build I want to stay with a very light optic, so back to a red dot lol. I have the earlier model PA on my 15-22, and pretty much hate it, so it's real hard for me to try PA again on this one. I don't "need" a T1/T2/H1, but need and want don't always line up lol...

I suspect by Monday I will have ordered one of the three, though... The BCM/KMR build is pretty naked with no optic yet :eek: Probably an Aimpoint combo from Larue to be honest. Have read several reports on the PA Advances of issues with buttons and w/e adjustments not working at all...

Not really ready for the "official" pics thread yet, probably going to grab a black Mod2 and lighter buttstock...MF maybe - but anyway...

 
Last edited:
Well, went and looked at the H1/T1/T2, same with all.. astigmatism blows lol. I mean it's usable, but I decided to go ahead and get the ACOG. Doesn't matter if I'm wearing glasses or contacts, it's crystal clear and chevron and marks are sharp. Still may look at the Leupold prismatic too, but not to many of those floating around...

 
Rugged?

Can anyone comment on the longevity of the Primary Arms offerings as regards holding up to the recoil of medium-powered rifles? I was thinking of getting one of the Primary Arms to go on my AK until such time as I can afford an AimPoint Micro, then transfer it over to rimfire duty. In the interim, I would like to be confident that utilizing it on a 7.62X39 won't turn it into a pile of parts (to exaggerate slightly).
 
Well, they put these through a pretty good torture test. Just look at the videos on the site.

Mine has moved over to a Mossberg 930SPX shotgun. I'm gonna blast away with that for a while. I don't know if it has more recoil than a 7.62x39, but it has more than my AR.
 
Ill await your results. I should be getting my tavor in and i need a sight for it
 
Nope, don't like it on the shotgun so, off it comes. It held up fine, I just don't like the way it works with a shotgun. Blocks too much of the target. The circle around the center blocks any kind of target acquisition. Like the ghost ring much better.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top