Pull Out, and Shoot

Trust you? You've only had the gun for a couple of weeks and then you say you "extensively trained" with it. Then you come out with the 60% failure to disengage the safety conclusion. That's why I came out with the "train some more" statement.
You have me confused with the original poster. I've been EDC my Shield for over a year and half and have more rounds through mine than most.
 
I prefer a safety. With my Shield I turn the safety off once its holstered. My Sig P938 I carry cocked and locked.
 
The Shield has a safety, at least two in fact.

The two-part trigger has a latch which is designed to keep the trigger from moving rearward by inertia if the gun is dropped. It is released when you apply pressure with your finger.

The striker is positively blocked until the trigger is pulled a short distance. It can't be knocked off the sear if the pistol is dropped.

The Shield is available with an optional thumb safety, which locks the sear in engagement with the striker.

Of course anything that pulls the trigger, like a shirttail caught in the trigger guard when holstering, will make it go bang. That's what the optional thumb safety is intended to prevent. Using a thumb safety is part of the manual of arms. Anybody with a 1911 is familiar with this drill. It becomes muscle memory within a few minutes of practice.
 
my first "non-.22" that i've owned and shot (my 9c) does not have a safety. And the full size 9 i just bought also does not have one. I am fine with that at home and at the range.
While i do have a permit to carry i have yet to do so (wont until i'm "Ready"). Not sure if i'd carry the compact i already own, or pick up something like a Shield for that purpose. I will admit if i go that route, i may be interested in one with the safety to give me the option should I want one.

I see both sides of the discussion, and both can have for me anyway legit pros or cons. Guess for me to carry, it requires a mix of training, experience, and being comfortable & responsible with what one owns and uses. I sure don't fault another for their choice.
 
I'm a clutz. The safety protects me. I have trained with it. I can put shots on target with proper speed. It's all in what you train for.
 
I posted this a few weeks ago in a similar thread

When I was researching the Shield I watched a video on YouTube in which the videographer inadvertently engaged the safety on his Shield while he was showing it at different angles and didn’t realize it.
I don’t think that only happens in YouTube videos. A safety is a mechanical device and mechanical devices malfunction .
I’ve had to draw a gun exactly one time in self defense in my life and that one time was enough to convince me that I don’t want to have to add any unnecessary steps (AKA opportunities to screw up) to the process.

It’s your life and your choice. You make the decision and you live with the consequences
 
Listen, can you hear it?
I hear begging...
"Close me, close me"
:rolleyes:


:)

Why , you did not have to click on it.
I like reading peoples opinions, I can see the merits for both.
On the one hand you have the reason for carrying a weapon & on the other you have the responsibility of keeping that weapon safe.
 
I have used a Glock for many years with no problem.

For civilians I can see where you might want a safety in some situations. If you constantly have to remove your firearm and stow it, say in a glove box, it might be a consideration. I try to avoid these situations but sometimes you cant. I solved this problem by using a quick detachable Kydex holster and just leaving the pistol enclosed. The holster completely encloses the trigger guard on the model I use. Really, any serious use holster should.

Most accidents happen when handling the pistol/revolver during loading/unloading and holstering/unholstering. With my IWB holsters, I have taken to putting the gun in the holster first and then adding it to the belt.
 
Back
Top