Rant: Another gun rag gets .308 vs 7.62 NATO wrong

LVSteve

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
23,123
Reaction score
35,093
Location
Lost Wages, NV
Doncha just love how certain inaccuracies become fact and refuse to die no matter how many times the truth is spoken. Yes, it's 7.62 NATO vs .308 Winchester AGAIN. Shooting Times trotted out the old fiction about .308 Win being a 62,000 psi cartridge and 7.62 NATO is only 50,000, so has much less pressure. WRONG,WRONG thrice again WRONG.

The 62,000 psi figure for 308 Winchester is the latest SAAMI pressure measured using a piezo pressure transducer. The value for 7.62 NATO comes from an old Copper Units of Pressure (CUP) style measurement, and the answer is indeed 50,000 CUP. It's like saying the distance between two points is 62 miles and somebody says, "No, it's much further, like 100 km". Unfortunately there is no "laws of physics" based PSI to CUP conversion, but empirical data does show a relationship. http://www.shootingsoftware.com/ftp/psicuparticle2.pdf

Shortly, somebody will appear and say "Ah, but it's 50,000 psi CUP". There's no such unit of measure. It's like measuring your inseam in grand pianos per decade. Don't go there.

If you compare .308 Win and 7.62 NATO as specified by the European standards folks at CIP, Commission Internationale Permanente pour l'Epreuve des Armes à Feu Portatives - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, lo and behold they are both rated at the same pressure. C'mon now, you're not really surprised, are you?

Yes, the SAAMI spec for the .308 Win CASE is not the same as that for 7.62 NATO. The latter has thicker walls at the head for use in automatic weapons with generous headspace, so it has a little less capacity than .308 Win. Big deal. Go look at the velocity specs listed by any of the big manufactures and you will see they are usually identical for bullets of the same weight. Does that sound like the extra case capacity is making much difference, or that one runs at 20% more pressure than the other? No, it doesn't work for me, either.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
I'll just pretend I understand what you're talking about.I'm still awed by the fact that socks can go on either foot.

They can??? Then why have I been putting a L and R on them all these years? Years ago I had to change my name. The only underwear I could find already had the name Calvin on them. Couldn't find any with my original name...............
 
Everyone is having fun with this, but this is a serious question.

Why would anyone write a formula "X equals negative Z plus 1.5 Y", instead of "1.5 Y minus Z"?

Look at the formula listed on page 4. PSI = -18000 + 1.5CUP (I rounded the numbers - sue me).

Why not say "PSI = 1.5CUP - 18000"? That's the way I learned to write formulas, waaaaaay back in high school algebra class.
 
Everyone is having fun with this, but this is a serious question.

Why would anyone write a formula "X equals negative Z plus 1.5 Y", instead of "1.5 Y minus Z"?

Look at the formula listed on page 4. PSI = -18000 + 1.5CUP (I rounded the numbers - sue me).

Why not say "PSI = 1.5CUP - 18000"? That's the way I learned to write formulas, waaaaaay back in high school algebra class.

Yeah ok.... I'm still recovering from the truck tire circumference odometer reading gasoline expense account thread.
 
I'll just pretend I understand what you're talking about.I'm still awed by the fact that socks can go on either foot.

That's nothin, how about latex gloves, no matter whether you need only a right or only a left hand glove or both you ALWAYS get what you need when you pull them out of the box. How does it know?
 
Steve, you've illustrated another reason that except for checking out Ayoob's articles occasionally I don't bother with the gun rags. They're mostly advertising circulars now anyway. And I don't mean just the undisguised ads.

As for the ribbing, I have a touch of OCD myself...:D
 
Uhhhhh question: don't the copper crushers used to measure CUP come with taridge (sp) tables that give a conversion to psi for the measured length of the crusher? I'm not an engineer and I didn't stay in a Holiday Express last night but I read that in a couple books several years ago.
 
Everytime I have to explain the 308/7.62 223/5.56 nonsense I feel like my head is going to explode. I wish we could go back to the 80's when nobody gave to bits and there was no such thing as a 77gr 5.56NATO. it was a non-issue until the internet.
 
LVSteve - thanks for good informative article. A shame so much BS followed it. Interesting question on the .223 VS 5.65 - if you have this comparison, would appreciate seeing what you turn up. Get the feeling the results are similar to the 308 VS 7.65 pressure measurements. Would be good to see all such data on a common base, but we can't seem to go from the old English measurements to Metric which is a better system for calculation. Again thanks for useful data.
 
Who likes exponentiation?! :D

Try THIS on for size:

piezo = crusher * ( 1 + ( crusher^2.2 )/30000 )

This formula is supposedly good for converting CUP values between 0-60 ksi. Beyond 60 ksi, conversions become progressively more inaccurate. Not that converting CUP to PSI was ever an exact science to begin with...

Does your head hurt yet? ;)
 
piezo = crusher * ( 1 + ( crusher^2.2 )/30000 )
Let's see what the equation gives us for 50,000 CUP (50 ksi):

piezo = 50 * (1 + 50**2.2/30000) = 50(1.18222) = 59.111 ksi[/FONT]

So it looks like that gives reasonably close results to the OP's statement that 50,000 CUP is roughly 62,000 piezo.
 
Let's see what the equation gives us for 50,000 CUP (50 ksi):

piezo = 50 * (1 + 50**2.2/30000) = 50(1.18222) = 59.111 ksi

So it looks like that gives reasonably close results to the OP's statement that 50,000 CUP is roughly 62,000 piezo.

You're a better man than me. I tried testing the formula myself and felt like my head was going to explode when I attempted to solve the decimal exponent.
 
LVsteve: Thanks for that article. I had always heard that the two measures were not convertible, but felt that was not really accurate. This is great information and I appreciate your posting it.
 
I'll stick in my $0.02

Crushing copper pellets is peachy keen fine except we have moved on to the "Digital Age" and the transducer, which measures pressure can be hooked up to measure the peak pressure over time... And that's where things get interesting. The pressure peak may be so transient that the copper does not have "time" to sufficiently deform. And spikes like that can result in failure of components. So copper is out and digital is in. Learn to live with it and love it.. :cool::cool:
 
Back
Top