Reloading data. Always way off?

I loaded them down to 3.5 grains of W-231, and got very good accuracy results. The 4.0 grn loads were about the same though. Here is a target that I shot tonight. 50' offhand with the 3.5gr. load out of a 28-2 Highway Patrolman with a 4" bbl. 10 shot group. I think I will stick with it.


0126101858.jpg
 
Last edited:
I had the very same experience described by others back in the 80s and 90s when I was shooting IPSC and worried about "making major" with my loads. I bought a chronograph and began checking. I was consistently amazed by how far off the common manuals of the day were, Speer, Hornaday, Sierra, all of them were low across-the-board. I ended up checking factory ammo too, and it was surprisingly close to published/claimed velocities, but load data in the manuals INVARIABLY produced lower velocities than claimed. I'm talking both rifle and handgun loads. I concluded at the time that the publishers worried about liability and thus exaggerated velocities to discourage folks from loading rounds hotter than they recommended.
 
Thanks acl864.
I split the difference, and loaded the remaining 150 or so with 3.7grs. I didn't post a picture of the 10 rd. target that I shot with the 4.0 loads, but it looked pretty much like the one above, with one flyer (that I knew that I pulled when I shot it!) in the 8 ring.

I am going to try the same load (3.7) with a batch of 147 grn. LSWCs next. It seems like a nice light target load.



WG840
 
As I'd pointed out in my earlier post, you are still a bit hot for HBWC's. Instead of upping your load which is likely actually reducing your velocity by tightening the "skirt" in the bore, try using a charge of 3.1grs to 3.3grs of W231.

Your group at 3.5grs is a good one if shot from an unsupported position but with a good HBWC load adjusted to the pistol you should be able to keep them all in the "X" if shooting off bags or bench at 25 yds.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top