boykinlp
Member
WOW, I have never heard of these, but for some reason, I like 'em!
Larry
[ame]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0zxZqeDzvrY[/ame]
Larry
[ame]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0zxZqeDzvrY[/ame]
WWII ..... Russian Sten
Typical Russian made simple and simple to maintain.
/QUOTE]
This gun looks strikingly similar to the Model 31 submachinegun developed by Finland, which the Russians found themselves on the wrong end of during the 1939-40 Winter War. Did the Russians essentially copy the Model 31?
Pronounced "pay pay shah" IIRC.
The 35rd mags were more reliable than the drum, but it looks cooler with the drum IMHO.
Firing the zippy 7.62×25 Tokarev cartridge, it must have been handy in the close in fighting in Berlin.
Typical Russian made simple and simple to maintain.
/QUOTE]
This gun looks strikingly similar to the Model 31 submachinegun developed by Finland, which the Russians found themselves on the wrong end of during the 1939-40 Winter War. Did the Russians essentially copy the Model 31?
A number of subguns developed between the world wars look similar. The Beretta Model 38 looks similar.
The PPSh was developed from the PPD. The PPD was expensive and time consuming to make as it used a milled receiver. The PPSh uses a pressed steel receiver. The later PPS was even more simplified.
The Russians did copy the Finnish drum design after getting shredded in the Winter War.
Not a PPSH, but close a Finnish Suomi KP - 31 : Suomi KP/-31 - Wikipedia
A friend gave this to me the other day. Brought it home and no place to hang it. So I gave it to a friend (part time gun smith) who loves Russian and Finnish items. No idea who or why it was cut up. But I couldn't afford to feed it if it was whole!!
Shot one once at a local machine gun shoot. Very cool, controllable and accurate. I still like the MP5 better (lots of .40 experience) or even the UMP .40 (lot's of rounds down range with that sub gun as well).
I think that 7.65 round is amongst the best choice you can make in an SMG caliber since it gives you a little more reach than 9x19. And the drum in the PPSH seems to last a long time with 3-5 shot bursts. Imagine that...
Edited for typo...
Typical Russian made simple and simple to maintain.
/QUOTE]
This gun looks strikingly similar to the Model 31 submachinegun developed by Finland, which the Russians found themselves on the wrong end of during the 1939-40 Winter War. Did the Russians essentially copy the Model 31?
In concept, absolutely. The tactics of the Finns greatly influenced the Russians.
Yet the Kp31 was all milled and machined while the PPSh-41 was essentially all stamped. The drum was certainly a copy.
The Kp31 has much greater range and accuracy and a a good cyclic rate for CQB. The Finns decimated the Russians with them particularly in ambushes and fast hit and run attacks.
The PPSh-41 is much cruder and lacks the range of the Kp31 but was very effective at close ranges.
Having owned and shot both, I have to say I prefer the KP31.
In concept, absolutely. The tactics of the Finns greatly influenced the Russians.
Yet the Kp31 was all milled and machined while the PPSh-41 was essentially all stamped. The drum was certainly a copy.
The Kp31 has much greater range and accuracy and a a good cyclic rate for CQB. The Finns decimated the Russians with them particularly in ambushes and fast hit and run attacks.
The PPSh-41 is much cruder and lacks the range of the Kp31 but was very effective at close ranges.
Having owned and shot both, I have to say I prefer the KP31.
Thank you for the information on the Finnish and Russian submachine guns. I grew up in an area where there were a lot of people of Finnish extraction so I started studying Finnish history and the Winter War with the Russians in 1939-40.
In concept, absolutely. The tactics of the Finns greatly influenced the Russians.
Yet the Kp31 was all milled and machined while the PPSh-41 was essentially all stamped. The drum was certainly a copy.
The Kp31 has much greater range and accuracy and a a good cyclic rate for CQB. The Finns decimated the Russians with them particularly in ambushes and fast hit and run attacks.
The PPSh-41 is much cruder and lacks the range of the Kp31 but was very effective at close ranges.
Having owned and shot both, I have to say I prefer the KP31.
Thank you for the information on the Finnish and Russian submachine guns. I grew up in an area where there were a lot of people of Finnish extraction so I started studying Finnish history and the Winter War with the Russians in 1939-40.
Did anybody read Post #14? The complete history of the KP-31 was there. Click on the link.