S&W 4006TSW California Highway Patrol (CHP) Information

skjos

Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
657
Reaction score
1,433
Location
South Sound, WA
The California Highway Patrol (CHP) is the largest state police agency in the nation and they have begun the 2.5 to 3 year process of switching over their 2006-2007 era 4006TSW to the M&P Gen 1 platform. As the 4006TSW’s are replaced they will become available for public purchase, with the first batch of pistols being offered in June 2017.

4006tsw.jpg



4006TSW (CHP) Features
Integral rail – in lieu of the riveted on rail used by most 4006TSW's, the CHP specified an integral rail.

Decock-only safety lever (spring loaded) – this keeps the firearm in a ready to fire state. The decocker body is unique in that it does not have a hole for the safety lever plunger/spring. Instead, the body has an indent on the far side that a plunger installed under the rear sight clicks into. If the decocker lever spring ever fails the decocker can be manipulated to operate as a manual safety.

4006tsw_decock.jpg


4006tsw_decock_rear_sight_removed.jpg


Bobbed hammer – this prevents thumb cocking, and was specified as a safety measure to reduce negligent discharges by inadequately trained officers.

No trigger play spring - reduces maintenance associated with replacing a non-essential part of the trigger mechanism, and eliminates the potential for a malfunction caused by broken spring debris.

4006tsw_triggerplay.jpg


Scalloped front strap - if a magazine failed to drop freely the scallop at the bottom of the front strap could be used to manually strip the magazine from the pistol.

Machined barrel recess - this feature is machined just forward of the feed ramp and seems unique to the CHP pistols; its purpose is unclear at this time.

4006tsw_recess.jpg


Magazine disconnect - the trigger will not operate the hammer unless the magazine is installed. This safety feature can reduce negligent discharges, and can be used to disable the firearm if there is a risk of losing it during a physical confrontation.

Non-alloy recoil guide rod - increase guide rod robustness and service life.

No night sights - To remedy this odd omission on a duty gun, many officers would place photo luminescent paint on the front sight and charge it during low light patrols by blasting it with a flashlight while the pistol was holstered.

Unique serial number - All pistols have a CHPxxxx serial number. A forum member who works within the CHP as a gunsmith reported that the serial number range is CHP1018 – CHP908A. However, a serial number has been observed slightly below this range (CHP1009).

4006TSW_CHP1009.jpg


Earlier CHP serial numbers were used on guns like this limited edition CHP 1006.
1006_CHP0257_Composite.jpg



Typical TSW Features:
TSW%20Flyer%201-2.jpg

TSW%20Flyer%202-2.jpg


Convertible slide - pistol can be converted between TDA and DAO by swapping the trigger, hammer, and sear release. Not 100% sure this can be done with a spring-loaded decocker.

Loaded chamber indicator - a small hole in the back of the barrel hood allows for visual confirmation of a loaded round.

Tighter frame-to-slide fit - the frame and slide were produced as a matched set. The tighter tolerances reduce the amount of vertical slide movement during recoil, reduces friction, prolongs pistol life, increases accuracy and reliability.

Reversible magazine catch - magazine catch can be orientated on either side of the pistol to accommodate left and right handed shooters.

Oversize frame and slide rails - increased robustness relative to the pistol's non-TSW counterpart.

Delayed lock time – this keeps the barrel and slide together longer reducing stress applied to the frame, extending the gun’s life and producing less felt recoil.


History
The Smith and Wesson initial contract with CHP was for 9,736 units, with deliveries to take place over a 1.5 year period starting in June of 2006. The CHP paid $683 per unit, but received a $170 credit for each of the older (early 1990’s) 4006 turned in.

There was some controversy over the no-bid contract awarded to S&W. SigArms had a competing bid to replace the agency’s weapons with the Sig P229 for 40% less than what was granted to S&W.

Pistol Bids.gif


The first 3,000 guns delivered were reworked to replace the sear, and there was some quality control issues noted on the first deliveries including failure to feed and the slide locking back prior to the last round, these were resolved with updated springs.


Parts List
M4006CHP_Parts.jpg



Part Commonality
The following list shows those parts that are common with other 4006 models. This is strictly based on Smith and Wesson part numbers, other parts may be compatible.
4006tsw_compatibility.jpg



Ready to Purchase?
A large number of the 9,736 to 9,900* units will become available to the public during the transition, however those past their serviceable life or purchased by agency officers will reduce the overall quantity (thread CHP 4006TSW post #50 suggested approximately 5,250 were purchased by officers). This may seem like a lot of pistols, however it is a fraction of the total number of 4006’s produced and only one of four models with an integral frame rail, the others being 4566TSW, 5906TSW, and 5946(-M).

*The original order was for 9,736 pistols, but the reported serial number range indicates around 9,900 pistols.


The following pictures illustrate what you can expect to receive; I ordered three pistols so this should be a good representation of the average condition. None of these pistols were cleaned, they are exactly as I received them.

Packaging:
4006tsw_box.jpg


Left Side:
4006tsw_left.jpg


Right Side:
4006tsw_right.jpg


Barrel Wear, including a manufacturing anomaly at the end of the barrel. The CHP received many of the barrels with this irregularity, it does not impact the function of the pistol:
4006tsw_barrel.jpg

CHP4082
4006tsw_barrel_grooves.jpg


Hammer mark on the frame:
4006tsw_hammer.jpg


4006tsw_hammer2.jpg


Magazines (five of nine marked "RESTRICTED: EXPORT, LAW ENFORCEMENT, AND GOVERNMENT USE ONLY", three of nine had numbers inked on the back - I assume this is an unofficial means of tracking the magazines).

You may receive a magazine with a red bottom, this indicates it was used for live fire training; black bottom magazines were used for patrol duty and cycled yearly:
4006tsw_mags.jpg


4006tsw_mags2.jpg



These pistols are currently going for a great price, and I would anticipate that they will appreciate once the supply has dried up. If you have any additional information please share it and I will update this post. Thanks to those who have help me make updates to this post, especially those within the CHP.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
That's a fantastic post. One small nitpick and one question.

First, it sure isn't the trigger return spring that is missing, it is the trigger play spring. It's more than obvious that you know that, this was just a typo.

My question: is the CHP the largest single LE Org in the Nation? I always thought that was the NYPD but I have absolutely no idea. It would seem to make sense that even though NYC is the largest city in the world, it certainly isn't larger than the State of California.

Oh, one more comment. With ZERO intention of sounding like I have never cared for the TSW pistols... it simply doesn't seem like spending MILLIONS to upgrade from a 4006 to a 4006TSW just isn't much of an upgrade. I would think when you throw that massive amount of money at something, you'd be making a large-scale change. Such as moving from a DA/SA metal gun to current technology polymer striker fire. This move I understand. But millions to move to the TSW from the 4006? That's sounds nutty to me.

Of course it isn't real money, it's taxpayer funded, so maybe I have answered my own question... (sigh)

But yeah, fantastic post! :D
 
That's a fantastic post. One small nitpick and one question.

First, it sure isn't the trigger return spring that is missing, it is the trigger play spring. It's more than obvious that you know that, this was just a typo.

My question: is the CHP the largest single LE Org in the Nation? I always thought that was the NYPD but I have absolutely no idea. It would seem to make sense that even though NYC is the largest city in the world, it certainly isn't larger than the State of California.

Oh, one more comment. With ZERO intention of sounding like I have never cared for the TSW pistols... it simply doesn't seem like spending MILLIONS to upgrade from a 4006 to a 4006TSW just isn't much of an upgrade. I would think when you throw that massive amount of money at something, you'd be making a large-scale change. Such as moving from a DA/SA metal gun to current technology polymer striker fire. This move I understand. But millions to move to the TSW from the 4006? That's sounds nutty to me.

Of course it isn't real money, it's taxpayer funded, so maybe I have answered my own question... (sigh)

But yeah, fantastic post! :D

The 4006s had reached the end of their service life.
The agency was satisfied with them.
They could replace (as opposed to upgrade) the aging 4006s with 4006TSWs without having to retrain anyone.
That's a pretty big cost savings, right there.
It all makes sense when you follow the money.;)

John
 
Thank you for your interesting post. It's a bit sad to see the CHP moving away from their 4006s to M&Ps. In the back of my mind somewhere there is a little voice that whispers plastic guns will always just seem like over-rated Saturday Night Specials. But, I am happy CHP at least was able to stay with a U.S.-made gun and hope the M&P works out for them. :)

Nice looking 4006s you received.
 
I have updated the post based on inputs.

CHP9969 would be close to the last ones made, the highest serial number I have observed is CHP661A, which I assume is unit 10,661.
 
...
Oh, one more comment. With ZERO intention of sounding like I have never cared for the TSW pistols... it simply doesn't seem like spending MILLIONS to upgrade from a 4006 to a 4006TSW just isn't much of an upgrade. I would think when you throw that massive amount of money at something, you'd be making a large-scale change. Such as moving from a DA/SA metal gun to current technology polymer striker fire. This move I understand. But millions to move to the TSW from the 4006? That's sounds nutty to me.
...

The reason for the replacement of the M4006 pistols was because the heavily used guns were nearing the expected end of their anticipated service-life. The original time-line guesstimates for how much use each of the original M4006 series guns would receive ended up falling short of the actual round counts experienced. EDITED: Perhaps a better way to say it would be the guns were fired more often and with more rounds than originally estimated would happen over the originally estimated period. (I was told by one of their weapons officers, a longtime friend, that there were actually something like 4 series of the original design 4006's ordered over the years, as increasingly more guns were needed, internally tracked as A-D series models by the agency.)

The improved machining, tighter tolerances and overall design changes in the TSW series resulted in .40 S&W guns that had a much longer expected service life than the original 4006 design.

The 4006TSW's were expected to last at least 50% longer than the original 4006's. Before they started ordering the new guns, representative 4006TSW's were subjected to extensive T&E shooting by CHP SWAT, and the TSW's demonstrated not only better durability, but maintained better inherent accuracy even after heavy use.

The 4006TSW's (and the much smaller allocation of 4013TSW's used by officers assigned to their plainclothes details) are probably not yet half way through their normally anticipated service lives, but there finally came a time when the agency decided to adopt a lighter .40 duty weapon, and the replacement is the M&P 40 (original model, not the 2.0). The M&P 40c started replacing the 4013TSW's sometime starting approx a couple years ago (after testing and review of other small plastic .40's).
 
Last edited:
Training costs to transition officers is very expensive. Going from a traditional DA/SA to a striker fired system will take a good bit of training and ammunition.

While I haven't asked about the transition program used, the CHP has never been an agency to "short" their people when it comes to training, and especially firearms training.

The average officer (post academy) will shoot monthly, on average, and for score every 90 days. That doesn't take into account any additional training that may occur, or any required qualification/training that may occur if an officer is assigned to an outside agency/multi-agency task force/detail (homicide, narcotics, vehicle theft, etc). For example, I knew CHP officers on loan to a couple of local task forces, and they had to shoot not only for their own agency (field office) requirements, but with the other task force agents, as well (who did more quals and training than other regular positions in their respective agencies).

I imagine it's increased since then, but back in '05 the CHP was buying 5 millions rounds of duty pistol ammunition annually.
 
Last edited:
Well I love the wealth of "insider" information and I also duly note that a typical .40cal pistol is more prone to wear than a typical 9mm or .45 pistol, but with that said, I'm chomping at the bit to hear some estimated round counts of what it takes (in the eyes of an agency armorer and/or procurement head) to approach the "end of service life" of an all-steel, full-size 3rd Gen.

I'll repeat, a .40 S&W chambered duty pistol should rationally have a shorter lifespan than a 9mm or .45cal counterpart, but I would expect the number to be HIGH.

So if we look at what has been discussed here (admittedly I am going from memory and not scrolling up) but these TSW's were put in to service when, around 11 years ago? And every specimen seemingly being released for public sale so far seems to show precious little use?

How many years did they use the 4006 before they went for the TSW's?

An alloy frame... it's "game on" for wear and possible life. But I suppose I am in the camp of folks who REALLY wants to see what a worn out full-size steel frame 3rd Gen looks like, because I haven't had the pleasure of seeing one yet.

And I try my best not to be overly skeptical all the time, but when it comes to government spending, my default is to raise an eyebrow. Absolutely, our sworn officers need solid equipment, I would never suggest otherwise. And while I only have the pleasure of owning two formerly issued 3rd Gens and that makes my tangible experience basically meaningless...

Bottom line: somebody show me some CHP 4006's (not these new TSW's) that are too old, too beat-up, and in need of being replaced.

If we think that integral rail 3rd Gens are a scarce beast, show me some end-of-life all-steel 3rd Gens, because I say those are far more scarce. ;)
 
Okay, quick math that is barely relevant but still stands out:

5 millions rounds of ammo annually and current discussion suggests "about" 10,000 CHP 4006TSW's in the 2006 procurement. That suggests 500 rounds annually per pistol if all were being used equally. We can all agree that NOT all were being used.

Maybe HALF were being used? Maybe 3/4? So perhaps a thousand rounds annually, on average? So we can say a thousand rounds annually... or even two thousand rounds annually? Over 11 years, that's significant use, if a realistic average. I could see a large (and WELL funded) agency replacing issued guns with 20,000 or 25,000 rounds through them. I'd expect some original bits need replaced at that point... but then again, these are routinely and professionally cared for by professionals, too.

I bet even the worst of the replaced non-TSW 4006 CHP guns have a generation or two of fantastic life left in them.

On a totally unrelated side-swipe, has anyone else mentioned how mildly shocking it is that a California Government agency is allowing regular American citizens to -GASP- purchase their handguns?! And I wonder, are these "on roster" and legal for re-import in to the land of fruit & nuts?
 
Speaking of California, I have a holster being made by one of the Forum members who lives there. He said, starting next year, in order to buy ammo, you will have to register at your local store. He didn't go into what all it entails, but I guess no more popping down to an outdoor store and picking some up on your way to the range. Wait a minute, do they even still have ranges out there?
 
Well I love the wealth of "insider" information and I also duly note that a typical .40cal pistol is more prone to wear than a typical 9mm or .45 pistol, but with that said, I'm chomping at the bit to hear some estimated round counts of what it takes (in the eyes of an agency armorer and/or procurement head) to approach the "end of service life" of an all-steel, full-size 3rd Gen....

Sending you a PM, if you're interested.
 
Okay, quick math that is barely relevant but still stands out:

5 millions rounds of ammo annually and current discussion suggests "about" 10,000 CHP 4006TSW's in the 2006 procurement. That suggests 500 rounds annually per pistol if all were being used equally. We can all agree that NOT all were being used.

Maybe HALF were being used? Maybe 3/4? So perhaps a thousand rounds annually, on average? So we can say a thousand rounds annually... or even two thousand rounds annually? Over 11 years, that's significant use, if a realistic average. I could see a large (and WELL funded) agency replacing issued guns with 20,000 or 25,000 rounds through them. I'd expect some original bits need replaced at that point... but then again, these are routinely and professionally cared for by professionals, too.

I bet even the worst of the replaced non-TSW 4006 CHP guns have a generation or two of fantastic life left in them.

On a totally unrelated side-swipe, has anyone else mentioned how mildly shocking it is that a California Government agency is allowing regular American citizens to -GASP- purchase their handguns?! And I wonder, are these "on roster" and legal for re-import in to the land of fruit & nuts?

The average round fired by an average officer was originally guesstimated to be 1200rds annually, but that figure turned out to be a low ball figure.

They kept having to order increasingly more 4006's as they hired more officers, so it's not like lots of guns were just sitting in storage.

Many guns ended up being issued to more than one officer, or being taken through the academy by more than one officer, and the number of rounds fired during an academy is ... significant.

Unplanned outside training and other assignments could also introduce unexpected demands against an expected service life (kind of like frequently taking long, unplanned road trips can add wear to your tires).
 
First, thanks for all the great information. A couple of questions about the CHP issued weapons. All of the pictures I seen so far show the pistols with the factory polymer grips, should I figure that a set of rubber grips (Smith and Wesson branded) would have been added by an individual officer? Fastbolt mentioned that the original 4006’s were acquired in four purchases, and tracked within the agency as series A-D. The example that I saw had an engraved number on the barrel, slide, and receiver, beginning with the letter E followed by the numerical portion of the serial number. Would it be reasonable to guess that these pistols would have been in the first purchase, after the original acquisitions?
 
So far in all the pictures I have seen, the 4006TSW CHP's have had the "E" prefix including one in the "A" suffix range, which I am assuming was produced after CHP0001 - CHP9999. The one 4013 CHP I saw had an "S" prefix.
 
Aside from learning of the replacements for the 4013/4006TSW's, I haven't kept up on any day-to-day developments with anyone from the CHP for the last few years.

Grip changes are often something authorized by agencies (like mine), with the restriction that it must be approved by the appropriate person, and it's installed by an agency armorer or an approved armorer/gunsmith. Things can easily vary from one agency to the next, of course.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top