Hey all.
I have a really nice m65-5 in 3 inch that I picked up as a police trade in many years ago. It's a fantastic revolver that I really like. I have a buddy that loves guns and is not as knowledgeable as he'd like to be. He was texting me the other day and asked me to compare my 65 to a Chiappa Rhino 30DS that is also a 3 inch in .357. I knew of it, but have never actually seen one in person or handled one. He was coming at it from "best one for carry" type aspect and he thinks that since it's 6 ounces lighter, it would be easier to carry. I had to disagree. Even though I've never held one, it seems to be awfully bulky and unwieldy. Am I wrong? I don't think I could ever swap mine for one no matter if the bore axis is lower and it handles recoil better.
So…have you ever compared the 2? What do you think? Would you ever consider a trade for your 65 in 3 inch for one the 3-inch Rhinos? I was a bit surprised to learn they are lighter and that they are so darned expensive. A plain Jane model 30DS in blue is about $1,200. I'd search out a m13 PC or a 586 L-comp for that money every day.
What's your thoughts? How do these revolvers compare in handling and carrying?
Thanks for your time and help. Have a great weekend all.
NalaJr
