S&W Combat Magnum

CLASSIC12

Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
1,699
Reaction score
11,375
Location
Switzerland
After buying the 4" model 19, I pulled the four I have out of the safe for some beauty shots

The blued

2df831d8599f36a8cbf8f845fc9e8476.jpg


9c504a3f9ac815727b6fb52fed7da430.jpg


The stainless

ea5c1e7ad2f79d4205fb29a3f96d238f.jpg


58d9894f34058d4a99097c297b5dc5f1.jpg


The family

97c51b73766b5efa49563c91057a3e8a.jpg


dd42734476d7335ae2fa54a4c9552a3c.jpg


The 6" stainless one was the second gun I bought brand new in 1988, at the tender age of 20 (and I tossed the cardboard box back then)

The 66 4" benefited from a pair of NOS original grips

d71c6a1c99cef0354ce7fdddde809797.jpg
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Gorgeous stocks on the M19s!

Great looking bunch of revolvers.

I've been meaning to take an M19/M66 "covey" photo but I've been really tied up with work, your post, OP, just might get me motivated!
 
contact

Dear Classic12,

I have tried to contact today via "send a private mail", but I think you haven't enough space in your file.
If you want you can send an email to me:
[email protected]
I'm a member of the SWCA for more than 20 years and my main Interests are Smith&Wesson HE Revolvers and I'm also interested in SIG 210, Colt, Walther and Uberti.
Best regards and looking forward hearing from you via email.

Paul SWCA# 1354
from Germany

ps. I have send the same text to your artice "19-3"
Wir können uns in Deutsch schreiben bzw telefonieren wenn Sie mir Ihre Telefonnummer per email senden, ich will meine Handynummer aus verständlichen Gründen nicht mitteilen, ich sende Sie Ihnen aber per mail meine Handynummer zu.
Danke, freue mich auf einen Kontaktaustausch, bin im Moment im Tessin.
 
Last edited:
The Combat Magnum is interesting as it is cosmetically a smaller version of its big brother the .44 Magnum,
They appear at about the same time , the .44 came out just a little earlier (1955 IIRC) But the .44 was introduced with a 6.5" Barrel with a 4" version offered about a year or so later.
In comparison the Combat Magnum was initially only offered with a 4" Barrel until the early 60's when the 6" and 2.5" versions appear.

I have a bit of Obessive Compulsive Disorder,
This makes me think the four inch .44 Magnum should have been named the ".44 Combat Magnum" and the 6" Combat Magnum should have been named the ".357 Combat Magnum Masterpiece".
 
I have a small collection of S&W Combat revolvers.....only 4. I do have a M-66-1 2 1/2" that is my best. Also, a M-67 4" Combat Masterpiece, a M-10 2"and M-36 2".

I'd like to get more.....but at my age of 73, I'm more inclined to sell what I have. I've been 'thinning the herd' slowly, for the last ten years. You can't take them with you, when you go "to the last round up." Bob
 
The six inch Model 66 has never been on my radar but although the bulk of six inch Model 19's are found with Patridge FS's they were available either way,
My guess is the 4" was intended as a holstered duty arm so the Baughman makes more sense as the Patridge fs blade tends to rake the holster inside and the holstered longer barrel version isn't as easy to get in n out of the patrol car so maybe they figured it was more of a sporting side arm.
I'm just guessing here.
 
Last edited:
Great collection.

Can you or anyone else tell me why the M19 6" has a Patridge Front Sight while the M66 6" has a Ramp Front Sight? Why the difference? Cheers.

Six inchers were available in both versions (the same for other models, as M27 for exemple). Baughman fs is more desirable in carried in holster, but the Patridge is the best at the range.
 
Great collection.

Can you or anyone else tell me why the M19 6" has a Patridge Front Sight while the M66 6" has a Ramp Front Sight? Why the difference? Cheers.


The six inch Model 66 has never been on my radar but although the bulk of six inch Model 19's are found with Patridge FS's they were available either way,

My guess is the 4" was intended as a holstered duty arm so the Baughman makes more sense as the Patridge fs blade tends to rake the holster inside and the holstered longer barrel version isn't as easy to get in n out of the patrol car so maybe they figured it was more of a sporting side arm.

I'm just guessing here.


Six inchers were available in both versions (the same for other models, as M27 for exemple). Baughman fs is more desirable in carried in holster, but the Patridge is the best at the range.

Indeed the 6" has a wide hammer and trigger, so definitely a target oriented gun

ef793b63c5d63c3910e09cfca95989dd.jpg


3aac18c631340864401875aa4f4aed2c.jpg
 
I have a couple 19's, a 4"and a 6" and i have 2 4" model 66's. One was my first duty gun, the other was my father in laws duty gun.
 
This makes me think the four inch .44 Magnum should have been named the ".44 Combat Magnum" and the 6" Combat Magnum should have been named the ".357 Combat Magnum Masterpiece".
I think the .44 Magnum should have been named the "Hand-Held Howitzer" :D

Can you or anyone else tell me why the M19 6" has a Patridge Front Sight while the M66 6" has a Ramp Front Sight? Why the difference? Cheers.
I've seen plenty of 6" M19's with the Baughman Ramp, as well as the Patridge, but I think the Patridge looks much better. I suppose you could even special order the Patridge for a 4" barrel, make it look like a Registered Magnum.
Not to say they didn't build any this way, but I've never seen an original production K or N frame stainless gun with a Patridge front sight. I couldn't find a picture of one in the SCSW.

Indeed the 6" has a wide hammer and trigger, so definitely a target oriented gun
All S&W revolvers with adjustable sights are considered target models. Target hammers and triggers could be ordered on either barrel length, my 4" M19-3 has both:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2016.jpg
    IMG_2016.jpg
    119.8 KB · Views: 19
Back
Top