SCOTUS hears Chevron deference case

[Smith & Hammer]

yesterday, the SCOTUS heard arguments regarding the Chevron deference law enacted in 1984. this will definitely have an impact on the second amendment going forward, as well as other government agencies too. I listened for most of it, it was over 3 hours long. I recommend listening to it, I'm sure you can find it on you tube. probably won't have an answer till June. this was long overdue for a review.

 

[llowry61]

I hope that they curtail the overreach of these unelected bureaucrats ramming things down businesses throats that congress never intended.

I dealt with it in banking with the CFPB.

 

[John Patrick]

I hope that they curtail the overreach of these unelected bureaucrats ramming things down businesses throats that congress never intended.

I dealt with it in banking with the CFPB.

Private citizens too!

 

[johngalt]

It would be spectacular to put an end to unelected bureaucrats creating law from thin air.

 

[somorris]

Thanks for the info.

 

[ladder13]

It would be spectacular to put an end to unelected bureaucrats creating law from thin air.

A dream of mine for many years.

 

[DWalt]

Overturning Chevron would rank as being one of the most significant SCOTUS opinions of all time. It would take the power of lawmaking back to Congress, where it belongs, and away from unelected bureaucrats in the the Executive Branch. Only problem is it that I believe that many in Congress do not necessarily want that power, as it would force them to do what he constitution says is their duty.

 

[ladder13]

Overturning Chevron would rank as being one of the most significant SCOTUS opinions of all time. It would take the power of lawmaking back to Congress, where it belongs, and away from unelected bureaucrats in the the Executive Branch. Only problem is it that I believe that many in Congress do not necessarily want that power, as it would force them to do what he constitution says is their duty.

Probably right you are on all.

 

[Well Armed]

Overturning Chevron would rank as being one of the most significant SCOTUS opinions of all time. It would take the power of lawmaking back to Congress, where it belongs, and away from unelected bureaucrats in the the Executive Branch. Only problem is it that I believe that many in Congress do not necessarily want that power, as it would force them to do what he constitution says is their duty.

They want it. The Republican and Democrat Party wants government agencies to keep the power. It gives either party the power to bypass hostile Congress to push their agenda when they're in power and do not have the votes. Litteraly everything Biden and Trump got done while in office was through E/Os and the regulatory branch. Neither side wants to lose power, so they both love Chevron.

I am not holding my breath for SCOTUS to blow Chevron deference up. It will more likely be a specific and laser targeted ruling that will only mainly apply to the plaintiffs.

 

[serger]

Yes it will be case specific. However, other plaintiffs will say what's
the difference between what ABC did to Joe Blow and what DEF
did to Jane Gray? After a couple of those SCOTUS will say they are
tired of the rehash and their ruling applies to all. At that point
Chevron will go away. Bad thing is in the interim all the bureau
generated positions/rulings.