hkcavalier
US Veteran
I put a few bux into this 10/22. Money well spent.

I have the basic cheapest model 10/22, (218.00 OTD) that I have mounted a Bushnell 3 x 9 x 40 on. With 4 10 round magazines I can waste ammo by the pound.
It is surprising accurate, or it would be if I would quit fooling with it. I floated the barrel, removed the band, and installed spacers inside the stock at the receiver to eliminate lots of side to side movement. I also replaced the trigger group with the Ruger direct replacement.
I still need to seal the stock where I floated the barrel and try some serious shooting with it. After almost 75 trips around the sun, I get the shakes when I shoot. It still does not shoot as accurately as my old Marlin model 80 DL bolt action that I have had for at least 50 years.
Here are a few photos, one with it's older brother, the 44 magnum.
Have a blessed day,
Leon
![]()
![]()
![]()
Rather than add drift to Rastoff's 'Guns Everyone Should Own' thread.
Considering current production .22 rifles. Which would you choose and why. I own a 10/22 (not a takedown model), a Marlin 60, a Marlin 795 (basically a magazine fed 60) and a Henry made AR-7. Not to disparage the 10/22, it would not be my first choice if I could only have one.
Of course, Ruger has sold 14 gadzillion 10/22s, am I missing something?
Browning SA-22. A classic take down.