Today I heard a report that YouTube is banning firearms videos.
I guess Im no longer using that media resource.
Jim
YT is banning videos with links to buy guns, which is perhaps more insidious than simply banning gun videos. They don't want to piss off the Free Information crowd, but as a result, they're directly attacking the livelihoods of the content creators that, you know, made YouTube filthy rich.
They're also banning videos with instructions on how to "assemble firearms", which as far as I can tell, doesn't mean anything. No more YouTube videos of how to install a 1911 thumb safety? Are field strip videos prohibited?
Now, the rest of this is a long-winded post, so you can tune out here.
The question is whether YouTube is truly a private business, or whether their popularity makes them more akin to a public utility. If it's the former, then they should be free to exclude whoever and whatever they want, and let the free market sort it all out. If it's the latter, then they should be required to serve all customers equally.
Although some people think that private businesses don't have any rights, but that's a different matter. Ethically, anyways, I have a real problem with attacking people's ability to monetize work they've already done.
I happen to think that they should be considered a public utility, because they have a monopoly, but for different reasons than you might think.
Let's say that I tried to start a gun-friendly video streaming service--GunTube, or whatever--to compete with YouTube for the firearms video market. Excellent! I can do that. I can buy all the hardware I need, I can buy some fat pipes to stream all that stuff on, and I can sign up advertisers.
But competition with YouTube is impossible. I will never be successful, because YouTube has a monopoly. They don't control the viewers, the advertisers, the technology, or the means of delivery. Instead, YouTube has monopolized the resource: knowledge itself.
In order to compete with YouTube, I would have to have a useful amount of content. And there's simply no way I could amass enough content to compete with what's already on YT. It's controlled the market for years. There are probably millions of gun videos already hosted. I couldn't possibly attract enough content creators to make new videos to compete with that, even if I had millions of dollars to fund years of losing money. And since YT videos are the intellectual property of the individual creators, I'd have to market to thousands, maybe even hundreds of thousands of people to get them to re-upload.
Look at what happened when ImageShack decided to switch to pay-to-play: a calculable percentage of the information on the internet was neutered. Millions of informational posts became worthless overnight.
People think that net neutrality is a big deal. Here, we've got unassailable businesses with the ability to censor our access to knowledge, even our culture itself. We look down on the informational autocracies of China and North Korea, but we're not much better off ourselves.