Originally posted by truckemup97:
Here's the problem, though. These bonuses are a part of their compensation package, spelled out in a contract. If the don't pay them, they run the risk of being sued for breach of contract.
Originally posted by truckemup97:
Here's the problem, though. These bonuses are a part of their compensation package, spelled out in a contract. If the don't pay them, they run the risk of being sued for breach of contract. Many of the people getting a bonus are working in parts of the company that actually did make money, and deserve the bonus for their performance. The rest of the company did so poorly that it ate up any profits that these profitable arms made.
Nope. You are mixing up three very distinct situations that cannot be compared. In bankruptcy the court voids all the contracts and tells the parties involved what the new terms are. Outside of bakruptcy, the UAW and an automaker can negotiate and mutually agree on new terms. The AIG situation is entirely different. The existing employment contracts can't be unilaterally or retroactively changed and so must be honored.Originally posted by Munsterf18:
I call BS.
Without the bailout they would be bankrupt and would get no bonuses. Renegotiate their contracts or fire them. They shouldn't profit from failure and the need of the country to bail them out.
What happened to the UAW workers? They got their contracts "renegotiated." What happened to the airline workers? They got their salaries and pensions "renegotiated" in Federal Bankruptcy Court.
You take the taxpayers money, you live by the taxpayers contracts - period. Anything else is spin by the execs to gain at our expense.
Munster
I seriously doubt that. They are not under a contract unless they are represented by a union. In my 30 years in business, including human resources, compensation and payroll, I never knew of management types whose compensation was protected by a contract. Incentive plans yes, but contracts no.These bonuses are a part of their compensation package, spelled out in a contract
That is not what is being reported in the news. Its says specifically that the $165 million paid as of yesterday all went to the group engaged in the risky investment bundling where AIG lost billions. This is part of a total $450 million bonus package, with the remainder to go to other parts of the company, but the current bonuses we are discussing ($165M) are indeed for the people who caused the problem.Many of the people getting a bonus are working in parts of the company that actually did make money, and deserve the bonus for their performance.