Sig P290 vs Shield?

I agree the trigger is different than those on a GLOCK/S&W/Springfield XD family pistols but should be no issue for those used to a pivoting trigger on DA/SA or DAO triggers...mine feels sweet...hope you get yours worked out or get something that fits you better mlapaglia...

Bill

Bill, thanks for the words of encouragement. The only other gun I have that fires with a DAO type trigger is my 1952 Pre-model 27. I dont fire it enough to in DAO to compare it to the SIG. Ill give it a few more months. Hopefully the nightly dry fires on the laserlyte trainer will help as will a lot more range time. I want to like it. Hopefully I will. If not someone will get a great deal on a Sig P290RS 2 tone with laser.
 
Good to hear...I know that I've been shooting Glock type triggers of late but I also shoot SIG DA/SA along with 1911 pattern pistols with their SA type...

I really liked the feel of the Shield and XDs as they were familiar to me at the gun shop...even disliked the feel of e SIG P290rs (because of that SIG banner label around the entire grip) but was pleasantly surprised thus far dry firing...I am really hoping the range experience is at least as positive...

Bill
 
I’ve had the 290RS for about 8 months. I actually stumbled across it out looking for a small carry with the wife. We looked at the 938, 238, LCR, LCP, Nano, CM9, and couldn’t find the Unicorn that is the Shield. The first thing that grabbed us was how well it fit and felt in the hand. Having and SR9c the DAO trigger was very awkward at first, but the fit and feel and positive reviews for the RS version made it easy to take the plunge. It is a very well made pistol and we loved the night sights. Now my one and only gripe would be the take down of the 290. Once I figured it out it was a breeze for me, but for the wife that's a different story. But after the first range trip and taking the time to learn the DAO trigger it is a great shooting pistol. We have 500rds down the pipe and not a single issue. I do know that Galloway Precision is working with RTK triggers for an even smoother, shorter, and lighter pulling trigger kit. And after speaking with both of them, it sounds very promising. Nothing wrong with the way it is now once you learn the DAO, but anything has room for improvement. MTF on that as I will give it a shot. I can whole heartedly recommend the 290RS for a small carry pistol.
 
I do know that Galloway Precision is working with RTK triggers for an even smoother, shorter, and lighter pulling trigger kit.

The spring kit and adjustable trigger are already available. However, the trigger does not allow the restrike to work. They are working on another one that will.
 
The spring kit and adjustable trigger are already available. However, the trigger does not allow the restrike to work. They are working on another one that will.

Yeah I was tracking that, I was talking with Jeri from RTK and was about to pull the trigger on the kit when I saw the message from Eric on GP's site. Jeri said they had the RS coming to them from Eric so it should be in the R&D phase by now.

Sent from a gadget
 
Had my .40 Shield for a year. Lots of rounds through it. Accurate and reliable as a sd/dc weapon. I use paper plates as targets (cheap). Draw a 2" circle in the middle. All rounds are on the plate with 4 or 5 in the circle. The feel of it is similar to my Bersa Thunder .380 which also is accurate. I believe the Shield is more reliable, so that is my daily carry.

I have a Bersa Thunder .22 for practice. Looks just like the .380 and weighs almost the same. It would be great if there was a Shield like .22 with the same trigger pull to use for practice.
 
First post on this forum, but I own the Shield 9 and the P290rs, and just shot them side by side a few days ago, so thought I'd offer a few thoughts.

Trigger: The 290rs is definitely long, but is smooth with very little stacking and breaks clean. My wife's primary range gun is a Sig2022, so both of us have a lot of experience with a DA Sig trigger. The biggest difference is that the reset on the 290 is way longer (basically all the way out) vs the shorter reset on the 2022 as it kicks into SA after the first shot. After adjusting for this, it was very easy for both of us to shoot the 290 well and with reasonably fast follow up shots. The Shield is a much shorter pull, with a bit of a "wall" at the point of the break. I shoot an XDM 3.8 compact 45 most of the time, so the Shield's trigger just feels like a stiffer version of that. Since the frame is also smaller on the Shield, I found that moving more of my finger through the trigger guard so the trigger face hits closer to the joint (rather than the middle of the finger pad) helps with comfort and also gives me a bit more leverage to get the Shield to break. All that being said, we put several mags through the 290 the other day, and when I picked up the Shield, I definitely experienced a "surprise break" as my trigger finger was still thinking DA...

Accuracy: I understand that these are SD and not target guns, but the 290 is definitely more accurate for both the wife and me. Out of the box, we both shot groups of well under 2" at 5 yards with the 290, and just a little wider at 7, using a basic Weaver stance. I can pretty much hit what I want with the Shield, but was shocked at how much of a tack driver the 290 is. As somebody mentioned earlier, I tend to shoot the Shield slightly left as well.

Sights: Perhaps this has something to do with the accuracy :) but the even in daylight the night sights on the Sig are way better than the Shield's white 3-dots. As a side-note, I used glow-on paint on the front sight of the Shield, which helped a lot, but the Sig still wins.

Recoil: This is something I haven't seen a lot of comments on, but the recoil on these two guns is very different. The muzzle flip / jumpiness is more noticeable on the Shield. With my wife especially, she felt that the Shield was bouncing all over the place as she was shooting. I certainly felt that the Sig was quicker to get back on target. On the other hand, the Shield is more comfortable to shoot, especially as the round count gets high. My personal and unscientific opinion is that the bore axis and/or center of gravity differs and is higher on the Shield. This causes the recoil to produce more flip. The Sig stays down and just pounds you in the seam of the hand just between the heal and the palm. Basically right above the fat area below the thumb where the back of the grip sits. I have put 600 rounds through my compact 45 in under 4 days and never experienced discomfort like I did with under 100 rounds in the 290. That doesn't make it any less of a fantastic SD gun, but extended range visits may require some Advil.

Comfort to carry: This is a toss-up, and really depends on how you carry. In a combat-cut IWB where the grip is directly against the skin, the Shield has the advantage, as the sandpaper type grip on the 290 will rub you raw. Pocket carry favors the Sig with its smaller dimensions. Btw, it shoots just fine with a pinkie tucked under the smaller mag (which is pretty much required for pocket carry), but the extended mag is a little more comfortable to shoot.

Reliability: Both were a little stiff at first (especially the Shield), but they run with no issues, except the occasional failure to lock back on empty with certain mags (both guns). I'm pretty sure that will resolve itself as I break the mags in. Given all the negative press about the 290, I just thought I would throw that in and mention that the 290rs ran great right out of the box and had no FTF with some cheap target ammo. I haven't put sd rounds through it yet.

Bottom line, both are great for what they are for. My wife shoots DA/SA a lot and prefers the Sig, despite the more painful recoil. I like the striker-fired Shield even though I am a little more accurate with the Sig. I guess when it comes to the type of trigger, in the heat of the moment I want to go with what I know will be more natural for me.

Hope this helps.
 
I have both the P290RS and the Shield. Just like so many others before me have said, the trigger pull is quite long for the Sig, but with practice you become very familiar with the pull and it is quite smooth. I like the Shield mainly because I have smaller hands and even though it is only 0.06" thinner than the 290, it is sculpted at the top of the frame that makes it feel like its paper thin. My wife has a G26 and she said she likes the way the Shield feels better than the Glock too (now I just have to find another for her). For the money, at least what I paid ($550) for the P290RS, Sig night sights, and laser it is a fantastic deal for the money. Sig quality it still excellent, just as good as my 226 and 229s. With that said, I carry the Shield and will until I find a reason not to anymore. Lack of night sights a big deal? Nope. Safety? Don't have to use it just because its there.

Good luck with your choice, but having both won't kill you if you can't decide. =)
 
I love my shield. But the 290rs comes with factory night sights and is a really nice gun over all.
 
I handled the 290 yesterday at my LGS and for a very small gun, it felt quite heavy. I can't imagine pocket carrying it after carrying the Kahr CM9 @ only 14 oz.
 
I have one of the original P290s and it's been a great gun. I've had a few light strikes but only with the Winchester white box ammo. Federal 115gr ball, 124gr hst and 135gr hydrashok all perform flawlessly. I have never had a problem with the mags or with the slide locking back and my sights are all still good. The trigger might be long but it's very smooth. I also have Ruger LCR .38 and a HK P2000 LEM and have no issues switching between them at the range.

Works for me!
 
I was curious about the P290 and handled one at the LGS last week. Looked like a quality firearm but the looooong trigger pull was heavy compared to my CM9 and fealt awkward. It felt a tad on the "boxy" side in the grip area. Checked out a Shield last year but just couldn't see it replacing my CM9 for pocket carry or my Sig 45 Ultra for IWB. Also have a 9C for IWB, but that little Ultra is a shooter. May still grab a shield being my LGS has a ton and they are on sale for $399, which is about $150-200 less than the P290.
 
Ok I gave up on the P290. I got a P938 as a bug to my Shield. Love it. Id be hard pressed to decide between the Shield and the P938. As for the P290 Im going to sell it.
 
Normally I am a Sig "enthusiast" and have owned several. Currently have a 228 and a 226. I have handled the 290 and have the same complaints others have voiced. Feels like a small sledge. If they put that top on a 228/229 frame, hot diggity. I think my next Sig will be a 227, 1) to complete the set and 2) 10 rds of .45acp in a 226 sized pistol is just what I need. Joe
 
Bumping this old thread to see if anyone's opinions have changed on the P290RS.

I just purchased one over the weekend to replace a Kel Tec PF9 for concealed carry. At first glance, I thought it was a chunky monkey. But then when comparing it side by side to other firearms, it looks wider than it really is, probably due to it being so short in both height and length.

The trigger pull is long, but smooth, much better than the Kel Tec I was carrying. I also prefer the feel of the P290RS trigger to the Shield.

I have read many say that the P290RS is too heavy for pocket carry, and that they prefer the Shield... The Shield is only 1.5 ounces lighter, and doesn't fit in my pocket nearly as well.

I have only put 100 rounds through mine so far, and I did have one fail to feed and also a light primer strike. I'm not too concerned though, as I was shooting Perfecta ammo (cheap stuff). The fail to feed was the last round in the 8 round mag. The fail to fire didn't fire even when I tried out the restrike capability. I'll run some better known ammo through it and see if I have any more issues.

Right now, Sig also has a rebate going where you get 2 extra magazines and a pistol bag.... with that and night sights already on the gun, I think it represents tremendous value.
 
I've been pocket carrying my Shield all week on vacation in the Smokies. If wearing something where it fits into the front pocket, it's hardly noticeable. If wearing something where I need to put it into a cargo pocket, I do feel it. Some short I have I need to carry in the cargo to avoid printing.
 
This was my thread from 18 mos ago so I'll chime back in: I bought both the Shield and the Sig P290. The trigger on the Shield is much better; so much so that I never even shot the Sig (but I still have it). The trigger on the Sig is long and heavy and the folks on the Sig forum don't believe it can be significantly improved. The Sig is a more attractive piece (to me) but I really prefer the Shield as a shooter.
 
Last edited:
This was my thread from 18 mos ago so I'll chime back in: I bought both the Shield and the Sig P290. The trigger on the Shield is much better; so much so that I never even shot the Sig (but I still have it). The trigger on the Sig is long and heavy and the folks on the Sig forum don't believe it can be significantly improved. The Sig is a more attractive piece (to me) but I really prefer the Shield as a shooter.

You should go shoot that Sig. The trigger on mine is not bad. It is long, but it is smooth. Took me a couple of mags to get familiar with it, but now it doesn't bother me. Doing a lot of dry fire with mine currently.
 
Both the Sig and the Shield are a little too big for pocket carry for me and I have better choices for holster carry. For pocket carry I prefer my Kahr 380 or one of my LCPs. I really should sell the Sig but I just haven't gotten around to it.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top