iskra
Member
Let's pretend! A prewar Smith masquerading as a Colt New Service, 45 Colt, c. 1939! Pretty good disguise huh!...
Just for the purposes of seeking help in this Smith Forum please... To ID a foreign proof, the only one of a fairly pristine gun! Just over the cylinder latch. Below photos principally show gun & proof positioning only. Otherwise too blurry for proof ID.
It appears: A crown over the number "17" over another number and that over something of a square. Narrow, vertical and appearing likely one single die for the whole mark.
A recently inquiry with the kind folks over on the Colt Forum so far without results. So spreading my bet, I wonder if any members might be able to put together a blurry image and a description to ID this marking.
Otherwise logical but apparently not any kind of British marking so far noted. The crown would fit (no pun intended) but the numbers in the tight vertical column simply don't! Appears struck with a single die.
Below several pix of the gun and a close one (best currently available) of the proof. Some proof mark research on the Internet also so far negative as well as positioning of the mark.
Any assistance appreciated!
Just for the purposes of seeking help in this Smith Forum please... To ID a foreign proof, the only one of a fairly pristine gun! Just over the cylinder latch. Below photos principally show gun & proof positioning only. Otherwise too blurry for proof ID.
It appears: A crown over the number "17" over another number and that over something of a square. Narrow, vertical and appearing likely one single die for the whole mark.
A recently inquiry with the kind folks over on the Colt Forum so far without results. So spreading my bet, I wonder if any members might be able to put together a blurry image and a description to ID this marking.
Otherwise logical but apparently not any kind of British marking so far noted. The crown would fit (no pun intended) but the numbers in the tight vertical column simply don't! Appears struck with a single die.
Below several pix of the gun and a close one (best currently available) of the proof. Some proof mark research on the Internet also so far negative as well as positioning of the mark.
Any assistance appreciated!