My smith & wesson model 29-1 seriel # S220006 4 screw plate left hand thread ejector rod 8 3/8ths inch nickel barrel is not documented
What does that mean?is not documented
Then what are all the documents for?...is not documented
Appears fully documented to me as well.Then what are all the documents for?......Ben
Actually if you read the OP, he says 4 screw plateAre you trying to say that the SCSW 5th edition does not list the revolver you possess as a variant of the Model 29? Perhaps sending the documentation you possess to the editors of the catalog would be more helpful than publicly calling out an perceived error.
The OP attached the Letter of Authenticity (see above) ...it's a 4 screw, 29-1.Actually if you read the OP, he says 4 screw platethat makes it sound like a 5 screw. Which it can not be if a 29-1. He doesn't show the yoke or right side of the gun so we are left assuming this is the actual gun documented.
And if you re-read my posts I am aware of the documentation. The OP stated it is a 4 screw plate, my 5 screw guns have 4 screw sideplates. We all know(or many of us know) that a 29-1 would be a 3 or 4 screw. I don't really think it is a different gun. But you never know. As I stated, we don't see the right side of the gun and he doesn't show the serial number, you are left assuming it's the same gun. I was just being difficult.The OP attached the Letter of Authenticity (see above) ...it's a 4 screw, 29-1.
I really don't need to re-read your post....The gun is well documented. It has been the subject of many posts on the forum, including Doc44's posts on the rarity of this gun.And if you re-read my posts I am aware of the documentation. The OP stated it is a 4 screw plate, my 5 screw guns have 4 screw sideplates. We all know(or many of us know) that a 29-1 would be a 3 or 4 screw. I don't really think it is a different gun. But you never know. As I stated, we don't see the right side of the gun and he doesn't show the serial number, you are left assuming it's the same gun. I was just being difficult.![]()
#5I really don't need to re-read your post....The gun is well documented. It has been the subject of many posts on the forum, including Doc44's posts on the rarity of this gun.