Oh, I don't know LPD256.
Let's debate something different and open up a thread on .25 ACP versus 9mm. After all the .25 ACP's diameter is only a tenth of an inch smaller than the 9mm's diameter, which is only a tenth of an inch smaller than the .45 ACP.
If the 9mm can be as good as the .45 ACP as it is claimed these days, even though 9mm is a tenth of an inch smaller in diameter than .45 ACP, then would it not follow that the .25 ACP can now be as good as 9mm because it's a mere tenth of an inch smaller in diameter than 9mm?
Isn't that how modern enhanced ballistics work?
Carrying this a bit further, it could then be argued that the .25 ACP is as good as the .45 ACP since .25 ACP can now be said to now be as good as 9mm.
Makes sense, doesn't it?
And to think that you read it first on Smith & Wesson Forum.
I like the way you think. Along the same lines, a.223 coming out of an AR is only .003 larger than a .22LR. If we could just get the media to realize a Marlin 39A and an AR shoot virtually the same round. Therefore AR’s are just as safe as your Grandpa’s squirrel-gun