So what happens after a primer detonates?

....
What we know from the article I quoted is that burning smokeless propellant being converted to high pressure/temperature gases requires a sizable increase in combustion volume before pressure can peak, whereupon pressure begins to decrease; and not before then...

Your statement makes no sense to me, the volume determines the limit of the pressure created for the powder burned. An increase in the volume is no required to reach peak pressure.

The highest peak pressure any loading can achieve is if the volume stays constant - the bullet does not move.

Because the bullet starts to move at some pressure (<10K) the volume starts to increase. Once the bullet velocity reaches the point where the increase in volume is happening faster than the burning powder can increase the pressure, this is the peak pressure point.

This can happen at any point in the dependent on the cartridge selected.
 
Last edited:
Rochelle, TX is almost exactly halfway between Brownwood and Brady and is the closest "town" to the middle of Texas. The "exact" geographic center of Texas is on private property about five miles from the highway marker on US377.

Virtually all the very nearby (by Texas standards) towns can claim midpoint status. Brownwood, Brady, San Saba, Goldthwaite, Santa Anna, etc.

I'm 25 miles east of the "exact" Heart of Texas in Mills County.

Welcome to the forum Texas Viking.

Bryan

I am thinking, since a heart is usually a certain size with relation of the entire body, then the heart of Texas could also be assumed so. So assuming the human heart weighs about 0.45% of body weight. Therefore if Texas is approx 268,820 square miles, then the heart of Texas would be about 1210 square miles. So anyone within that range (circumference from the center) of the geographic center would be in The Heart of Texas. That would be about 19.6miles from the center.

I took lots of liberties with those numbers, but you get the point.

Rosewood
 
Last edited:
And to make such a statement without proving it by pressure testing is an a**-umption. I don’t care if they’re shooting the .32 H&R Magnum or the .500 S&W Magnum. There’s reason why Lyman tests with VENTED barrels for revolver loads.

OK, so when exactly does the pressure reach it's highest level? Please provide pressure tested proof.

I just took some measurements and it looks like a the base of a bullet will travel about an inch before exiting the cylinder on my N frame 45 ACP revolvers. Do you think peak pressure happens after that?
 
Your statement makes no sense to me, the volume determines the limit of the pressure created for the powder burned. An increase in the volume is no required to reach peak pressure.

The highest peak pressure any loading can achieve is if the volume stays constant - the bullet does not move.

Because the bullet starts to move at some pressure (<10K) the volume starts to increase. Once the bullet velocity reaches the point where the increase in volume is happening faster than the burning powder can increase the pressure, this is the peak pressure point.

This can happen at any point in the dependent on the cartridge selected.

That does not surprise me considering that in another thread you stated that pressure peaks before the bullet had even left the cartridge case.
 
Last edited:
I am thinking, since a heart is usually a certain size with relation of the entire body, then the heart of Texas could also be assumed so. So assuming the human heart weighs about 0.45% of body weight. Therefore if Texas is approx 268,820 square miles, then the heart of Texas would be about 1210 square miles. So anyone within that range (circumference from the center) of the geographic center would be in The Heart of Texas. That would be about 19.6miles from the center.

I took lots of liberties with those numbers, but you get the point.

Rosewood

But you are comparing weight to size, kinda like apples and oranges,,,:)
 
reddog81 asked: “OK, so when exactly does the pressure reach it's highest level? Please provide pressure tested proof.”

When it peaks, of course! LOL.

The point being that the only way to know when pressure peak occurs is by pressure testing by the PSI method where an oscilloscope is measuring pressure increase until the peak and back to 0 in a measured period of time. That cannot be done with the Crusher method and the only real advantage Piezo PSI testing has over Crusher CUP testing where only the Max average can be found. However, the Crusher method continues to be used and both tests can be conducted simultaneously. And no, I don’t run a lab so I don’t have the ability to pressure test like Lyman does. And neither do the people who state that pressure peaks before the bullet leaves the cylinder. And in about the same time that a post can be typed, an email can be sent to Lyman, whom does test these things.

“I just took some measurements and it looks like a the base of a bullet will travel about an inch before exiting the cylinder on my N frame 45 ACP revolvers. Do you think peak pressure happens after that?”

Obviously, and as I mentioned, there are differences based on the Max Average Pressure, MAP, of the cartridge, and how much gas volume it creates before pressure peak occurs. The higher the cartridge pressure MAP is, the greater gas volume required. So to quote the Lyman article again: “Movement of bullet into the barrel throat increases the expansion volume of the gases.”

That comes from an unvented barrel, but the physical process does not change other than there being a flash-gap between the cylinder and the forcing cone averaging around .006” or less, ideally. The first restriction of consequence that a bullet encounters after leaving the case is the barrel’s throat in either case; hence the term Freebore. Unless your cylinder throats are abnormally large, not much gas is leaking around the base of the bullet until the base of the bullet has passed the flash-gap due to the bullet’s diameter mostly blocking the escape of gas until that occurs and some of the increasing gas volume escapes from the flash-gap while gas volume is increasing to the point when the bullet is moving into the throat and seals as the bullet meets the resistance of the rifling. And effective seal is not actually created until the bullet obturates, and a softer bullet does that sooner than a harder one in the case of lead bullets compared to jacketed.
So the 1” of bullet travel you’re talking about is unrestricted (freebore) until the bullet is into the throat. It certainly seems likely that a .45 ACP cartridge (21,000 PSI) would pressure peak before a .357 Magnum at 35,000 PSI due to the differences in Max Pressure. But coincidentally, I checked the throats on my most used 4” combat revolver at very close to .357” diameter. For pressure to peak before the bullet’s travel meets the resistance of the throat would require a substantial loss of gas volume where the only place that can occur is via the flash-gap. And since the gases created are pushing the base of the bullet with not much leaking ahead of the bullet?
But like I said, feel free to contact Lyman and you’re certainly welcome to quote what I’ve stated here.
 
Last edited:
Since I entered this cold cruel world in Brownwood at a hospital that no longer exists, in the heart of Texas I think I'm fully certified to add my two cents here. Once I did an experiment many years ago with a chronograph and a 5 inch 1911 and a 6 inch, 45acp (and you don't know how ashamed I am to say this on this wonderful forum) Taurus Tracker revolver. Anyway, I was getting consistently and unmistakably higher velocities out of the 6" revolver with the same 45acp ammo than I was out of my 1911. That let me know that the revolver gap isn't near the detriment to power as most might think. I frankly was astonished at the results.
 
Last edited:
I am thinking, since a heart is usually a certain size with relation of the entire body, then the heart of Texas could also be assumed so. So assuming the human heart weighs about 0.45% of body weight. Therefore if Texas is approx 268,820 square miles, then the heart of Texas would be about 1210 square miles. So anyone within that range (circumference from the center) of the geographic center would be in The Heart of Texas. That would be about 19.6miles from the center.

I took lots of liberties with those numbers, but you get the point.

Rosewood

Works for me! But considering the size of Texas and its irregular shape, I think it might deserve a bit more margin of error; certainly to TXBryan's 25 miles from Rochelle and just one county away like I am. But who knows how long it's been debated?
 
Since I entered this cold cruel world in Brownwood at a hospital that no longer exists, in the heart of Texas I think I'm fully certified to add my two cents here. Once I did an experiment many years ago with a chronograph and a 5 inch 1911 and a 6 inch, 45acp (and you don't know how ashamed I am to say this on this wonderful forum) Taurus Tracker revolver. Anyway, I was getting consistently and unmistakably higher velocities out of the 6" revolver with the same 45acp ammo than I was out of my 1911. That let me know that the revolver gap isn't near the detriment to power as most might think. I frankly was astonished at the results.

Well, leave it to a Texan to make such a logical point! Without a slower pressure peak and a greater increase in gas volume, a 6" revolver wouldn't likely produce more velocity than a 4" one!

Thanks, Tex!
 
Works for me! But considering the size of Texas and its irregular shape, I think it might deserve a bit more margin of error; certainly to TXBryan's 25 miles from Rochelle and just one county away like I am. But who knows how long it's been debated?


It's been debated since 1845, since statehood, since those in Washington deemed the Republic of Texas too big to make a mere state and cut it down to it's current size. The Republic did stretch into the current state of Wyoming.
 
And I'm not sure that some of these presumptions don't date back to black powder!

But thanks for the history! I didn't remember the Republic extending that far north.
 
That does not surprise me considering that in another thread you stated that pressure peaks before the bullet had even left the cartridge case.

The 45 ACP typical load will achieve peak pressure while still in the brass.

I have tested a variety of handgun cartridges using both strain gauges and peizo transducers (both SAAMI and CIP protocols) and can say with reasonable confidence that the vast majority of handgun cartridges this is true.


PS - I do have pressure test equipment and test like Lyman does- while I don't have a crusher but I don't find it a problem.
 
The 45 ACP typical load will achieve peak pressure while still in the brass.

I have tested a variety of handgun cartridges using both strain gauges and peizo transducers (both SAAMI and CIP protocols) and can say with reasonable confidence that the vast majority of handgun cartridges this is true.


PS - I do have pressure test equipment and test like Lyman does- while I don't have a crusher but I don't find it a problem.

Editing to remove some snide & joking comments.

So let me ask, who made this pressure testing equipment you speak of? And have you considered having someone else test your data for confirmation? i.e. a 2nd opinion?
 
Last edited:
This forum, unlike others and above all others I take everyone at their word here. I do know for a fact there are multi-millionaires who frequent and post here regularly. It might be wise to not disparage others here.
 
This forum, unlike others and above all others I take everyone at their word here. I do know for a fact there are multi-millionaires who frequent and post here regularly. It might be wise to not disparage others here.

Point taken. I handload because I'm not a multi-millionaire. But, then I'd probably handload anyway!
 
Last edited:
Editing to remove some snide & joking comments.

So let me ask, who made this pressure testing equipment you speak of? And have you considered having someone else test your data for confirmation? i.e. a 2nd opinion?

Let me guess after I tell you the equipment I have / use you and next you be asking for photo's and SN. I own Ohler, Willams, Kurzzeit, LabRadar, PressureTrace Systems (both 1 and 2), PCB Piezotronics, and Fisher Scientific.

The reason I started testing myself was the lack of datasets in my areas of interest.

I have produced datasets which are/have been validated by other labs, both internal and contracted. As previously mentioned I test using SAAMI or CIP protocols, my data can easily be replicated by anyone using those process.
The majority of work performed is actual validation of data set simulations.

It is no secret here as to my cartridge interest and most of my work centers around large caliber handgun cartridges, in particular the 460 S&W Magnum. My rifle interest lies in .458 caliber cartridges and wildcats.
 
Pistol -vs- revolver barrel length

Once I did an experiment many years ago with a chronograph and a 5 inch 1911 and a 6 inch, 45acp (and you don't know how ashamed I am to say this on this wonderful forum) Taurus Tracker revolver.
Anyway, I was getting consistently and unmistakably higher velocities out of the 6" revolver with the same 45acp ammo than I was out of my 1911.
That let me know that the revolver gap isn't near the detriment to power as most might think. I frankly was astonished at the results.

That 45ACP 5" 1911 barrel is in actuality a ~4.10" barrel, chamber shoulder to muzzle. (5" pistol barrels include the chamber length as well as the hood's length in there designated barrel length :()

The 6" revolver barrel is more like a 6.25" barrel when you consider the cylinder's throat.

You'd have to have a huge B-C gap to defeat that 2" barrel advantage with the 1911.

In my thread below I tested 45 Super in a 4-1/4" 4586 against a 4" 625PC.

Though the 625 actually had an 1" barrel advantage (4.28" -vs- 3.29") they had virtually the same velocities (until the 4586 ran out of recoil spring power with the max load) with the 4586 technically winning by a whisker up to that point.

45 SUPER face-off: 4586 -vs- 625PC

.
 
I have first hand knowledge of that event. 40 S&W cartridge with a mis-seated primer detonated in my fingers while trying to remove primer.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20200921_131759.jpg
    IMG_20200921_131759.jpg
    31.5 KB · Views: 15
  • Ouch.jpg
    Ouch.jpg
    29.9 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_20200921_131712.jpg
    IMG_20200921_131712.jpg
    32.4 KB · Views: 11
Last edited:
Back
Top