'Splain to me the .22 Magnum

I keep a 22 mag semi auto carbine by my bed. A 9mm carbine would do about the same but it wouldn't do so well for crows, starlings or what-have-you out the bedroom window.

It's a wicked little round. You should try it.
 
I don't currently own a .22 Magnum rifle.

I'd be interested in a 9422M, or perhaps a 77/22 or CZ 457 in .22 Mag, but mostly just to have one, not so much because it fills a niche.

I have a number of very accurate .22 LR sporters, and I have three very accurate .22 Hornet rifles.

You can get accurate match .22 LR for around $5.50 per box of 50. In addition, .22 Hornet is one of the most inherently accurate cartridges around and it's easy to load 1/2 MOA accurate ammo at no more cost than .22 Mag ammo.

In short, my beef with .22 magnum has been the lack of really accurate ammo. Yes, it's more potent than the .22 LR, but it's far less potent or accurate than the .22 Hornet, which offers the same relatively low noise advantages of the .22 Magnum, but with better ballistics and accuracy.
 
I always remember what someone said. 22 Magnum = 1/3 more power + 3 times the price. It might not 3 times the price now but it is definitely more money than more 22 LR.
 
I saw a customer once in a LGS. He had a North American Arms mini revolver in .22 mag and said it would shoot 2000 fps out of it. He was an old guy and I didn't say a word. It would be interesting to chronograph one...
 
The 22wmr isn't cheap nor is the 17hmr. I don't shoot much in smaller calibers.

When ever I hear groundhog caliber I think of the 22-250.
 
LOL...Googled ".22 centerfire rifle cartridges"...... first link I opened listed 14 different .22 centerfire cartridges....."splain that to me" :D

All varmint rounds designed to take "small game.... at long range..... 200 yards."

The second article talks about the 5 most popular......22 hornet, .221 fireball, .223 .220 swift and .22-250.

.22-250 " ......40 gr bullets.....at 4000fps"

Sound like great cartridges for the western plains..... here in Pa.'s woods and smaller fields the .22mag is fine for varmints out to 100-120-150 yds........ 30-40 gr and 1800 to 2300fps. Bought a "stash" of CCI back when they were $13/50. As a field round that can last a summer.

That said I do own a couple of bolt action .223 and .243s.......but am not a handloader..................
 
Last edited:
My 4 inch magnum 651 gets .22 rifle ballistics with 40 grain hollow points and my 6 inch 648 beats .22 rifle velocities by 20%, all measured on my chronograph. Most .22 long rifle hollow points don't expand at handgun velocities and, therefore, don't do real well killing small game. .22 magnum 40 grain Goldots from a 4 - 6 inch revolver expand dramatically and kill small game as well or better than long rifle hollow points from a rifle. A .22 magnum revolver is a very useful firearm in the field.

BTW, I live in the rural woods and have harvested thousands of small game animals over my 60 years of small game and deer hunting.

I also keep Ruger 77/22 mag hanging handily in my house as my "farm" gun. In rifle form, the magnum is a bit much for edible small game but perfect for problem creatures. I use a .223 when purposely calling coyotes in nearby open farm land, but find it more than I need in my woods.

Just relaying the experiences of an old guy.
 
I have had two convertible 22/22 Mag handguns and no longer own one. The 32 H&R and even the 32 Long have replaced the 22 mag. A 100 gr bullet, does so much more with small edible game, even at a lower velocity. In a rifle, or Contender pistol, I have a bunch of 22 caliber centerfires that I can load to or past 22 WRM velocities.
If it works for you great, if it doesn't don't kick at it.
 
I checked online. 22 magnum costs about 21 cents per round. 22 Hornet bullets cost about 21 cents per round. Then you need primers and powder and cases and dies and free time. Obviously the 22 Hornet is more powerful. Actually the 22 magnum seems to be about half way between the 22 LR and the 22 Hornet.
 
Last edited:
Explain it to you?

Ok.

It does "X".

I like that it does "X".

I can easily find ammo so it can do "X".

This is America where I'm free to choose the way I want to do "X".

Understand now?
 
Last edited:
My, .357magger, what an arrogant post. But I would like to hear the value of X, quite outside your personal preference, which means nothing to this thread.
 
Okay, okay. I'm sure we'll all agree that some cartridges are better than others, and maybe the .22 magnum isn't the absolute best in its league, but you've gotta admit....it's just plain fun shooting cartridges with such great creative names such as the .218 Bee, the .22 Hornet, the .219 Zipper, the .221 Fireball, or the .220 Swift.

Of course, nobody in his right mind would want to shoot a cartridge called the .22 Stinkbug, but the .219 Donaldson Wasp??? That's a different story.:D
 
Last edited:
Okay, okay. I'm sure we'll all agree that some cartridges are better than others, and maybe the .22 magnum isn't the absolute best in its league, but you've gotta admit....it's just plain fun shooting cartridges with such great creative names such as the .218 Bee, the .22 Hornet, the .219 Zipper, the .221 Fireball, or the .220 Swift.

Of course, nobody in his right mind would want to shoot a cartridge called the .22 Stinkbug, but the .219 Donaldson Wasp??? That's a different story.:D

You are right, I want them all. Also the 22 Velodog. I actually saw a 22 Velodog revolver at Cabelas but for $450 and no ammo being sold I left it there. I did drag my triva-loving daughter back there, so she could say, "I have seen one."
 
Those dogs in France must have been a real problem to warrant it's development let alone it's use!
... and how about the 6.5 Grendel, now there's a name that'll live in infamy!
Sometimes the name is designed just to get your attention ...
350 Legend
The list goes on
 
22 Mag in a Marlin bolt

I had a Marlin tube fed bolt rifle (882 maybe) was very accurate and effective on woodchucks to about125 yds.
I'd definitely have a S&W 351 in 22 magnum if it wasn't $200 more than my 442 and 360J
 
I checked online. 22 magnum costs about 21 cents per round. 22 Hornet bullets cost about 21 cents per round. Then you need primers and powder and cases and dies and free time. Obviously the 22 Hornet is more powerful. Actually the 22 magnum seems to be about half way between the 22 LR and the 22 Hornet.

I just checked on GunBot and the cheapest .22 Mag ammo I could find was Win 40 gr JHP at $0.22 cents per round ($11.00 for a box of 50.

In comparison, I load a lot of .22 Hornet using both Hornady 40 grain V-Max and Barnes 30 grain Varmint Grenade bullets. The 40 gr V-max cost a bit more but they can still be had for $21 per 100, so $0.21 each.

PPU .22 Hornet brass is $15.79 for a bag of 50 or $0.31 each and I get 6 reloads per case (more in a .22 K Hornet), so figure $0.05 per shot starting with new brass. Once fired brass is $14 per 100 or $0.14 each and roughly $0.03 per shot. Primers are $0.03 each. Powder is about $0.04 per shot.

----

So that's a choice between:

- $0.22 per shot for .22 magnum with a 40 gr. bullet at 1910 fps with maybe 1.5 to 2 MOA accuracy; or

- $0.31 to $0.33 per shot, but 2600 to 2900 fps depending on the load and 1/2 to 3/4 MOA accuracy.


If you set aside the cheapest .22 mag you can find, and instead shop for what shoots best in your .22 Mag rifle, the .22 Mag ammo prices are closer to $0.31 per round on average - some higher in the $0.40-$0.50 range and some lower at $0.25-$0.28 per round.

Which to me, means it isn't really a tough choice at all and .22 Hornet is a clear winner.
 
Back
Top