I carry an older Model 36 that can't or at least isn't recommend to use +P in and I've done a decent bit of testing and research. From my understanding of Lucky Gunner tests on ballistics gel and Paul Harrell tests on his famous meat targets the consensus seems to be that most stuff doesn't reliably expand with standard pressure. From both sources, one of the very few that seemed to was Hornady FTX 110 grain JHP which is what I use currently. The only other from Lucky Gunner that did is Federal Micro HST which I cannot find anywhere.
Paul seemed to indicate for penetration the FTX may be lacking on bigger targets, this he seemed to suggest 158 grain semi wadcutter or wadcutter if you are limited to standard pressure. While not something that keeps me up at night, I do want to make sure the ammo I'm carrying is capable of, God forbid, I had to use it.
My questions are essentially:
1. Is Hornady FTX in standard pressure going to reliably expand/penetrate for defensive use in a snub like my Model 36? If so what would be a way I could test this myself affordably? (I was thinking water jugs stacked up)
2. Am I just better off getting a more modern scandium or aluminum hammerless revolver for my carry needs that can use +P?
Paul seemed to indicate for penetration the FTX may be lacking on bigger targets, this he seemed to suggest 158 grain semi wadcutter or wadcutter if you are limited to standard pressure. While not something that keeps me up at night, I do want to make sure the ammo I'm carrying is capable of, God forbid, I had to use it.
My questions are essentially:
1. Is Hornady FTX in standard pressure going to reliably expand/penetrate for defensive use in a snub like my Model 36? If so what would be a way I could test this myself affordably? (I was thinking water jugs stacked up)
2. Am I just better off getting a more modern scandium or aluminum hammerless revolver for my carry needs that can use +P?