State-of-the-art Varmint Rifle

greenmachine

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
1,060
Reaction score
1,647
Location
Indiana
Well, maybe in 1948 when it was new. Winchester Model 70 Target Rifle in .220 Swift. Marksman stock, 26 inch heavy barrel with a Unertl 2-inch Ultra-varmint scope. The second picture shows the same gun with a Model 70 Varminter in .243, also with a 26 inch heavy barrel and a Unertl Vulture scope. This one is a little later, I think about 1960.
 

Attachments

  • scan0108.jpg
    scan0108.jpg
    146.9 KB · Views: 226
  • scan0106.jpg
    scan0106.jpg
    145.5 KB · Views: 207
Register to hide this ad
Very nice pair!
Still state of the art in some of our hearts- I'd go with the SWIFT!
Seriously, how do they shoot???
 
Barrels for the .220 especially older ones would be suspect. The cartridge was a barrel-burner before better steel and powder calmed things down a bit.
 
I used a 20X 1 1/2" Unertle target on my Anschutz match rifle for 100 yard competition. The glass is so clear you could see the tiny tears on the edges of the .22 holes at 100 yards. The only problem with the Target scopes were the minimal depth of field, you had to focus very critically. Still very usable today, and have held there value very well.

For my Varmint rifles (Prairie Dog) I used a couple of Mod 700 Remington VS. and had a 6.5 - 20X Nikon Monarch on one, and a 6-18X Leupold on the other. Both were fine scopes and allowed me to make hits out to 500 yards, but my eye's weren't good enough beyond that. I still have one of them with the Leupold on the odd chance I ever get an opportunity to go again. The Leupold wears a custom elevation knob made to the exact ammo spec's. Wonderful combination. You can read your range finder, and dial in the exact distance for an on target hold.
 
Last edited:
Very nice pair!
Still state of the art in some of our hearts- I'd go with the SWIFT!
Seriously, how do they shoot???

The Swift has the advantage accuracy wise, well under an inch consistently. The .243 won't quite do that, but I love what it does to a groundhog.
 
Barrels for the .220 especially older ones would be suspect. The cartridge was a barrel-burner before better steel and powder calmed things down a bit.

This one has always been babied. Rifling is still strong at the breech. Mild hand loads can prevent that erosion and still produce impressive velocities.
 
Gorgeous rifles. Always wanted to get into a .243, but I'm trying not to expand the caliber selection.
I have a .220 Ruger that is extremely accurate, even in my impatient hands, but truth be told, I'd prefer it in .223, only because that would probably be enough round for anything I do with it, and would be one less round to stock- along with being more cost-effective.
The Swift's capabilities are wasted on my abilities!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top