SW 642 Pro PP or Ruger LCR

RossMatt

Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2011
Messages
81
Reaction score
6
Location
Louisville, KY
Thoughts? I have heard so many opinions.. and have held both guns... LCR feels great and I like what I read about the recoil.

Both look like good snubbies and I am somewhat torn.
 
Register to hide this ad
The LCR has superb recoil absorbing grips and trigger pull. The downside is that the grips are a bit chunky and for some reason they used a very large trigger guard. I have tried the boot grip, and while it is more compact than the standard grip, it is very smooth and a bit slippery. I wish they had stippled it or used a more sticky rubber.

The 642 on the other hand is a bit thinner and slightly smaller, and thefore is a better gun for pocket carry, even with the slightly longer 2.125" barrel (but sight does look snaggy to me). So, my conclusion is if you want to pocket carry, go with the Smith. If you want to holster carry or use some other method, it is a tossup and I would go with whichever gun feels/shoots better for you.

For myself, I had great hopes for the LCR. I bought one and tried it out. It feels/shoots better for me, and I loved everything except the little bit of extra bulk. So, I went back to my old 342 for pocket carry, and my daughter who never pocket carries, now has a second backup LCR.
 
Last edited:
Thanks...

I plan on using an IWB holster or an ankle holster just depending on what I am wearing...
I don't think I'll mind the added bulk of the hogue tamer in wither one of those uses if I go with a LCR. But, I suppose I could get one of those for the 642 also...

I have just heard great, great things about the trigger on the LCR and I think I have been spoiled by my PC 327.

Decisions...
 
i don't think i'll ever own a polymer framed revolver. it just seems sacrilegious. and with this video on youtube, i doubt i'll be picking up an LCR.
 
Last edited:
The LCR has superb recoil absorbing grips and trigger pull. The downside is that the grips are a bit chunky and for some reason they used a very large trigger guard.
"cut"

If you want to holster carry or use some other method, it is a tossup and I would go with whichever gun feels/shoots better for you[/B].
"cut"

My thoughts exactly when I checked out the LCR. Ended up with the 442 for pocket carry and am quite happy.
 
They need some time to work the bugs out of new designs. Meanwhile the 642 has a pretty solid track record and give all the LCR would in performance.
 
I have a 642 and love it. I shoot about 100 rounds through it every Sunday. I have put around 2000 rounds down the barrel and of all the guns I own I like it the best because of its so easy to carry.
 
I've now owned both an LCR, which I didn't waste much time in selling, and a 642.

I had held the LCR in a gun shop, drooled over them when they couldn't be had for under $500, and finally bought one when I found one for ~$430 or so... I don't remember the exact figure. I do remember the 642 was about $450 at the time. This was less than 2 years ago.

The LCR looked cool, but carried poorly in the pocket. It's been awhile, and a lot of guns in between, but I seem to remember that it was grip heavy, and would eventually rotate to upside down when in a loose pocket (like on cargo shorts). It seems the grip was very sticky, too, so clung to fabric. Ammo was very difficult to procure at the time... heck, all ammo was hard to get, but .38 spcl and .380 must have been made of unobtainium... it was nonexistent.

The flame-cutting of the frame had come to light after purchase, so with that also in mind, I traded the little guy off. I also traded off my LCP because ammo was unavailable. That was stupid on my part, and I've since replaced it with a nice hard chrome model, and plenty of ammo :)

I just picked up the new 642 yesterday on sale for $329+tax ($357 OTD). My dealer cut me some slack on a box of Hornady Critical Defense ammo, so that sweetened the deal a little. Yes, it has the lock. I'm thinking about removing it and replacing with a plug.
 
I sold my 442 for an LCR and sold the LCR for a new Bodyguard 38 polymer. It is the best so far for me. Light, lower bore axis, absorbs recoil very well, accurate and I've put about 300 rounds through it. It's actually fun to shoot. +Ps are not an issue. I carry with Silvertips, like a compromise. All I have done was to add a green HiViz on the bow.

HiCap
 
I still have my 642 with the stupid lock but I also have the LCR in .357. AND I AM IN LOVE WITH THE LCR MORE THAN THE 642.
 
I have a 340M&P and have had a 642 as well. Bought an LCR yesterday with the front XS sight. Compared to the boot gripped J frames it has less felt recoil, the trigger is lighter and the empty cases basically fall out when you tip the gun up. As much as I dry fired I still am not able to get off a fast trigger squeeze with the 340M&P without the front sight jumping to the right. It's fine if I take like 3 secs to squeeze it. LCR is better in that regard.
The grip on the LCR is a little chunky compared to the 340's boot grips but it still conceals in the same pants pockets. I've got a Hogue boot grip coming and will try that.
 
I have a 642 PP Pro and love it. Its a great small frame revolver and just a little out of the ordinary to be more unique than other run of the mil 642's. I put facotry J frame bananna grips on it and recoil does'nt bother me at all.
o8B09l.jpg

The local Cabela's has them on closeout for $499. Bought mine last year from a LGS and paid $580 OTD.
 
Haven't shot the smith, but I have the LCR and it's one fine shooting revolver. One thing that helps is the factory grips having that cushion area on the back. Mind you if you get the Crimson Trace grips they don't have it.
 
I have a S&W 640 with crimson trace grips and I love it. I haven't tried the LCR so I can't speak for it.

640.jpg
 
Last edited:
pennhead,the .357s I use are the 125 grain Hornady Critical and my 158 grain fmflp and the both do me very well in handling the socalled recoil of the .357 which is a big joke because,I hardly feel the recoil from the Ruger LCR revolver compare to the airweights and screwed up scandiums. Those of you who are afraid to shoot the .357 in a .357 revolver should stick really to .38s or .22s
 
Back
Top