Hillbilly77
Member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2012
- Messages
- 6,183
- Reaction score
- 18,481
gun control issues with everyone. Lots of people just start yelling, don't seem to want to listen to what we call facts and what they call propaganda.
I have learned that there is a huge difference between the "NONS" and the "ANTIS". This can be true for ANY topic of debate.
A "non" can be talked to and valid points can be brought up.
An "anti" is unwilling to hear the other side's points at all.
For instance, I talked to a woman that was a non-hunter (not an anti) once. She was loaded with false pre-conceived ideas about hunters. She looked at us all as a bunch of redneck weekend warriors out in the woods, just blasting away at sounds and movements with glee.
I explained to her that she was mistaken. I explained that I understood the weight of taking an animal's life, and that I felt a personal responsibility to deliver a quick, painless death, and to treat the animal with respect, etc.
When I took the time to politely explain to her why I hunted, and how, I was able to convince her that she was mistaken in her ideas. She actually admitted that she was wrong in her assumptions and THANKED me for taking the time to explain a hunter's point of view to her.
The point is, that she was a "non", not an "anti".
Little good can be done by trying to argue with an anti. They are usually unwilling to hear it. If we act mad, nasty, and antagonistic, we only serve to convince them that they were right all along. The best approach is politely disagree and leave it at that.
The lesson I have learned is that we need to pick our battles, and be respectful. We won't sway an anti. I think the best we can do is to educate the "nons" and prevent them from becoming "antis".