- Joined
- Mar 24, 2006
- Messages
- 3,277
- Reaction score
- 2,584
At least Ruger is producing the .327, come on S&W get your products to the market!! In the meantime, I got to find another 631!!
Not Tom but with mine the chambers were not consistent. It required too much force to eject the empties and the fired cases were not all the same size. Cases fired in some chambers could not be reinserted in other chambers.
Ruger replaced the cylinder in mine, I'm sure it's fixed now but haven't shot it yet since getting it back.
Bob
I read the article and what jumped out at me was the 9# double action and 2 3/4# single action trigger pull on a J-frame.
How can they do that? Can Performance Center do that and maintain dependability as far as light strikes go? If they can - I'll send my 340 in to them tomorrow . Can any good gunsmith do that without compromising primer strikes by using light springs? I understood NO, or I'd have had mine worked over long ago.
I've got thousands of clicks on it and it's very smooth. But my poundages are nothing like those. I've probably have double action well up in the teens and I know my single action goes around 5 1/2# which is considered fairly light for a J-frame if I understand correctly.
Did they use very light springs in this gun? Does .327 ammo use easier primers than all other ammo?
Why can't we all lighten our J-frames up to 9 and 2 3/4 pounds?
What gives?
I'm not in the market for a .327 gun. But I'm sure in the market for getting my 340 J-frame to those poundages.
Anyone have some input for me?
Thanks I did check mine and they seem a little hard to eject how long have you had yours as I said I bought mine around Christmas and I really don't want to send it back.