The "Grease gun" - a retrospective...

Joined
Jan 24, 2007
Messages
10,358
Reaction score
52,000
Location
Arizona
This is another future article for your review. As always, comments are welcome. Many of you, like me, have had hands-on experience with this submachine gun in the military. Hope you enjoy it.

John

U.S. M3 and M3A1 submachine guns

M3_GREASE_GUN4A_zpsfexxomfq.jpg


As World War II began and as the United States entered the war on December 7, 1941, our country’s inventory of military weapons was sadly lacking. Not the least of our problems was that our main submachine guns, the Thompsons, had origins dating back to the early 1920s. These were excellent and reliable guns, but quite heavy with forged steel frames and not really suited for mass production. In the meanwhile, the Germans had developed a second generation of submachine guns, the folding stock MP 38 and the subsequent similar MP 40. These could be turned out rapidly because of their stamped sheet steel receivers, and were considerably lighter than our Thompsons. Being compact when their stocks were folded, they were also better suited for cramped quarters such as inside tanks. The British were using U.S.-manufactured Thompsons, but saw the German precedent and began to manufacture their own somewhat crude but lightweight Sten submachine guns in 1941. Both the German and British guns fired the standard European 9mm Parabellum cartridge. In the United States, Thompson production could not keep up with demand, so our military went to work designing our own lightweight stamped steel subgun that would be chambered in our standard .45 ACP caliber. The result of these efforts was the M3 submachine gun. Because of its obvious similarity to a common automotive lubrication tool, it was quickly nicknamed the “grease gun.”

In October 1942, the U.S. Army Ordnance Board, seeing the trend set by the German MP 38s and MP 40s and the British Stens, began a study to develop a similar gun for the U.S. Originally it was to fire either the .45 ACP or .30 Carbine cartridges either in full-auto or semiautomatic mode. However, the Aberdeen Proving Ground found the carbine cartridge too powerful for a blowback weapon locked only by the mass of the bolt and the power of its recoil springs. The semiautomatic requirement was later dropped, due to a slower rate of fire in the full-automatic mode. George Hyde of General Motors’ Inland Division was instrumental in developing the design. Frederick Sampson, Inland Division's chief engineer, was responsible for all tooling and production.

The .45 caliber M3 subgun was formally adopted quickly in December, 1942, and was a startling departure from the Thompsons. It cost the government about $20.00 in 1943 dollars. Its receiver was crafted into a tube shape from stamped and welded heavy gauge sheet steel. The trigger and retractor housings were likewise made from sheet steel. The 8-inch barrel was screwed into the front of the receiver. The heavy steel bolt was backed by twin recoil springs, and the firing pin was nothing more than a projection machined into the face of the bolt. The gun was a straight blowback design made to fire from an open bolt. Pulling the trigger released the bolt to jump forward, stripping a round from the magazine, chambering it, and firing it as it slammed home. Firing in full automatic mode only, the gun would continue to fire as long as the trigger was depressed and there were cartridges in the magazine. The sear would hold the bolt to the rear when the trigger was released unless the ammo in the magazine was exhausted, at which point the bolt would be in the forward position. The bolt could be retracted manually by a prominent spring-loaded lever assembly on the right side of the receiver. A spring-equipped ejection port cover was employed, and when placed down over the ejection port, it served as a safety. The sights were fixed; the rear sight was a simple stamping with an aperture in it. A retractable heavy wire shoulder stock was employed.

While the gun was chambered for the .45 ACP cartridge, it could be easily converted to 9mm with the use of a magazine adapter and changing out the bolt and barrel with 9mm versions. The M3 fed from a 30-round double-column single-feed magazine, mimicking the type used on the Stens. These were not quite as reliable as the double-position feed of the Thompsons, which required less energy to strip a round into the chamber. The rate of fire was a comparatively slow 350 – 450 rounds per minute, compared to some models of the Thompson, which could push to 725 RPM. With its slower cyclic rate, the M3’s trigger could be “tapped off” for single shots if needed. The gun weighed 8.15 pounds, compared to the Thompsons, which weighed from 10.45 to 10.75 pounds, depending on the model. Overall length with the stock extended was 29.8 inches, and when pushed forward, the total length was a handy 22.8 inches, making it very suitable for tank, engineer and aviation crews. The gun could be slung using the standard M1 carbine canvas sling.

The M3 was used throughout World War II, supplementing the more prevalent Thompsons which remained the standard SMGs. The “grease gun” was generally satisfactory but it had one main design flaw. The retracting lever mechanism was both complex and somewhat fragile, resulting in some unfortunate failures in combat. The solution to the problem in December, 1944 was both simple and ingenious. In the newer M3A1, the retracting lever was dispensed with entirely, replaced by a single finger hole for the right forefinger in the bolt, accessible through a larger ejection port. Inserting a finger into this hole allowed the user to retract the bolt back so it could be caught by the sear. Another nice touch for the newer gun was that the bolt and recoil springs could be removed for cleaning from the front by simply unscrewing and removing the barrel. The older M3 required removing the retractor housing from the upper receiver for this. Additional changes were a stock plate and magazine filler being added to the wire stock, and an oil can incorporated into the pistol grip. A longer barrel ratchet spring was used for more positive retention of the barrel, and the magazine catch was provided with a guard to help prevent inadvertent release of the magazine. Weight of the M3A1 was a reduced 7.95 pounds. The gun illustrated for this article is one of the original WWII M3s. The M3A1 saw little (if any) combat action during WWII, but was used extensively in Korea and Vietnam.

The Guide Lamp division of General Motors made approximately 646,000 M3s and M3A1s from 1943 to 1945 during WWII. A version of the M3 that incorporated a sound suppressor in the barrel was developed, with about 1,000 being produced during the war for the OSS (Office of Strategic Services), the forerunner to the present day CIA. After the war, a curved barrel was developed for clearing tanks and transport vehicles from the inside and for shooting around corners. A cone-shaped flash hider was also developed, suitable for both the M3 and the M3A1. About 33,200 M3A1s were produced by the Ithaca Gun Company of Ithaca, New York during the Korean War to supplant those guns left over from the WWII era.

M3s and M3A1s, sometimes produced outside the U.S., have been used by 18 other nations at one time or another. M3A1 submachine guns continued to see some use by our armed forces into the late 1980s, and as late as the Gulf War were still in inventory with engineer units attached to the 1st Armored Division. Originally designed to be cheaply made and thrown away when worn out, they were a surprising mainstay component of our combat forces for many years. Collectors of Class III (legal full-auto firearms) treasure them. Such collectors should be prepared to part with thousands of dollars, endure federal paperwork, and purchase a federal tax stamp. All this to own a gun that originally cost about $20.00! Some semiautomatic look-alikes with longer legal 16.5-inch barrels have been made for those without the inclination and/or funds to purchase the originals. Some semiautos in “pistol” form with no stocks have been made with 8-inch barrels. The originals occupy a milestone position in historic U.S. small arms weaponry, and are indeed classics.

(c) 2016 JLM
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
My Old Man (on the left, with the Grease Gun) said he never liked this submachine gun because it was so short you couldn't lean it up against anything like a rifle. Said he kept a Garand in the truck.
He also said as a result of yucking it up in the photo with this German headgear both him and his buddy got head lice.

file_zps63b1aec3.jpg
 
Last edited:
I enjoyed the write up as always. One sentence seems out of sequence.

"It was designed to fire in blowback mode from the open bolt position.

How about:

The gun was a straight blow back design made to fire from an open bolt.

Just a suggestion to make the design more clear.

Thank you for posting these articles. I look forward to the next one.

BLM
 
Nice article, thanks for sharing. I only got to shoot one once but liked it. I was amazed at how cheaply it was made and still worked.
 
I enjoyed the write up as always. One sentence seems out of sequence.

"It was designed to fire in blowback mode from the open bolt position.

How about:

The gun was a straight blow back design made to fire from an open bolt.

Just a suggestion to make the design more clear.

Thank you for posting these articles. I look forward to the next one.

BLM

Thanks for the suggestion. Good point.

Best,
John
 
John: Very good article. I have owned both the M3 and the Sten MKII and used them in competition at Knob Creek. My M3 came from the Beaumont (TX) PD after having served in England. It was covered in very worn black paint-like coating in 45acp... and had been proofed in 45 in UK. The Imperial War Museum could find no record of the Brits using 45 as the recoreded lend-lease guns had been in 9mm. Also, they did not start the black coating until about 1950. So, no explanation...

In practice the M3 was incredibly reliable and would feed anything I offered up. Single taps were very easy as the cyclical rate was in the 450 range on my gun... a little slower than the Sten. The M3 bolt was quite a bit heavier than the Sten which made the point of impact a little less controllable than the Sten.

I also owned an inert MP40 and was able to compare the quality of construction. As you know the Stens were built in a cottage industry of kitchen tables all over the country. The M3 clearly showed the quality of General Motors head and tail lamp construction. The MP40 was even slightly better.

Alas, all 3 guns are gone now but turned out to be excellent, excellent investments. Thanks.

I appreciate the articles you do on these great old guns.
 
Last edited:
In Thailand in 1972 while at MCAS Rose Garden (Nam Phong), I watched our Armorer destroy all of the M3A1's we had in our armory. He used a sledge hammer to smash them flat. Tried to talk him into giving me one, but no dice..........
 
Another great article John! :D

I'm well acquainted with the old Grease Gun. To make a long story as short as possible. Late 1972 to 74, I was the driver of a M578 Recovery Vehicle in 2nd Armored. I was supposed to have a 1911, but we didn't have enough. After breaking the stock on three M-16A1s, our armorer found me a M3A1 for a personal weapon. I carried that for about a year and a half. It was a hoot! :D
 
My Father was a Sargent in a Combat Engineer Battalion in the ETO in WW2. He hated the weapon and said he could shoot his .45 faster than the grease gun.
 
Informative article on a gun that was junk. It might have been
good for kicking in doors but not much else other than personal
protection. Was handier than a 16 for going through hatches.
It would be a hard choice if it was 1911vs M3. The quality of them was of throwaway type. I cut my finger badly on grip
seam on one of them.
 
Leon Uris didn't think much of it in his book "Battle Cry".

Thanks for the article though. Interesting.
 
I think this sentence (see brackets below) is in error. By the time of the Korean War, the M-3 was far more prevalent than the Thompson, at least among US forces.

[Thompsons were still more prevalent as the standard subguns.]

Also, I'd spell out "gauge" rather than use "gage."

If the Thompson was still more prevalent by Korea, it contradicts all I've read about the matter for decades. You should say why you feel that way, if so. Did you mean that the Thompson remained more common in WWII? Clarify.

Otherwise, nothing bad jumped out at me. But I skimmed the article pretty quickly. I did enjoy it; I'm just in a rush tonight.

I do not normally do Beta reader work, but for you, I'll make an exception. I like your articles and photos.
 
Last edited:
Good article and well written as usual.

I have only owned one fully auto weapon.
A S&W model 76.

Perhaps a write up is in order since this is the S&W forum ??

A fun little gun that ate everything i fed it. Mostly bought cases
of the cheapest ball ammo i could find with real brass.
Fiocchi was used mostly IIRC.
The 76 also fired from an open bolt.
Also i believe the S&W 76 was actually carried by the Seals at one
point. Someone correct me if i'm wrong.

Chuck
 
As a former Tanker, TC and Master Gunner, I carried the M3 along with a chest holstered 1911 for several years before being reclassified. Still miss those days in the TC hatch and all that youthful splendor. Still have my old tanker boots to keep the memories fresh in my mind.
 
Last edited:
Never fired a Riesing, have handled them. Gun wasn't junk, just
not a good combat design. Not a throw in mud gun. There were
a lot of M3s in RVN, not to hard to come up with if you wanted
one. Thompsons were a different story, very scarce. Guys that
had them had to sleep with them. Most got passed to a buddy
when owner DEROSed. A lot of guys had chopped m2 carbines.
Some outfits were strict on non issue weapons. Ours didn't care
what extra you were toting as long as you had issue too. When
you are sitting on Quad 50 or Duel 40mm it was nice to have
a shorter weapon than M16, and the ability to haul them around.
 
Back
Top