The Load?

Register to hide this ad
It's actually using a 158 gr LSWC, but a 160 or 168 Keith will work too. It's also in .38 Special brass with a standard primer.
 
I couldn't agree with Paul any more on this issue. I know there was the 40 page behemoth of a thread about "THE LOAD" and many of us tested and promoted the use of it in "K" frame 38Spl revolvers.

Since then I have relegated it to use in an all stainless "J" frame and "L" frames and above.

I'm sure not going to run it through a vintage revolver of any kind. Even if it is a C**t. (4 letter word in my book! ;) )
 
Even if it is a C**t. (4 letter word in my book! )
I have to agree with that assessment, the only Colt I own now is a Commander, but no revolvers have stayed.

Now, that doesn't mean THE LOAD will destroy a K frame and could be used on a very limited basis. However, why subject a K frame .38 to the pressures generated, when most people have a .357 that is better suited to handling the pressures?
 
My M14 has seen several cylinder loads of "THE LOAD" but that is all. Since we already know that the M19 has had issues wearing out with a consistent diet of hot 357Mag loads, why push it?

Why try to use a tack hammer as a sledgehammer?
 
???????????????????

Would "the load" be safe for a S&W mod 68-2 ?

That's like someone asking if it was ok to jump out of a perfectly good airplane! It would depend on quite a few variables, one such being, are you planning on wearing a parachute?

How do we know what would be safe in your firearm?

Since it is a "K" frame, follow my earlier information on what I have done.
 
Somewhere I have chronograph data on THE LOAD shot from my Outdoorsman. If anybody's interested, I'll go find it. As I recall, I worked up to the starting load of Speer #8 and stopped there.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top