OMG. I'd rather see a malfunction than have a person kill that many people with a boneheaded mistake. What I have seen on a lot of 'Mayday' episodes is that the plane flies its own way if it gets some bad info. Just watched one where the pilots were diving to get to the glide slope into the airport and one bad altimeter (out of three) made the plane think that it was already on the ground and auto throttled the engines back with the pilots being too busy to notice and when they expected to have power, they didn't and they were too low to see it and correct it in time.Capt. Steve on the tube thinks that the pilot flying may have called for gear up and the co-pilot accidentally retracted the flaps decreasing lift and not reducing the drag of the gear.
He said that once the pilot throttles up for takeoff the 787 will throw all kinds of warnings if the aircraft's settings aren't properly set for takeoff.
I know nothing about flying but I like his videos
There is this condition we look for called the "Stabilized Approach". Diving to get on the GS is not stabilized and the approach should be abandoned. Compounding a bad situation by doing stupid stuff can result in a real mess. That holds true in every day life, but when a couple hundred souls are depending on your action so they can wake up the next morning you need to get it right.OMG. I'd rather see a malfunction than have a person kill that many people with a boneheaded mistake. What I have seen on a lot of 'Mayday' episodes is that the plane flies its own way if it gets some bad info. Just watched one where the pilots were diving to get to the glide slope into the airport and one bad altimeter (out of three) made the plane think that it was already on the ground and auto throttled the engines back with the pilots being too busy to notice and when they expected to have power, they didn't and they were too low to see it and correct it in time.
Yes, it was chancy way to approach, but everybody did it and some pilots had even experienced throttling back but were able to compensate. This conditions in this case were such that the throttling back happened at a very critical time that wasn't picked up by the pilots.There is this condition we look for called the "Stabilized Approach". Diving to get on the GS is not stabilized and the approach should be abandoned. Compounding a bad situation by doing stupid stuff can result in a real mess. That holds true in every day life, but when a couple hundred souls are depending on your action so they can wake up the next morning you need to get it right.
I would rather not speculate but one thing keeps coming to mind, and that is the human factor, whether it's pilot error, faulty maintenance or shoddy risk assessment (to avoid a massive bird strike, etc.). Take offs are optional...landings are not.
Photos of the wreckage show the flaps deployed in takeoff position (Partial extension). When and how they were deployed TBD, but the "expert" said they were highly unlikely to have extended in the impact..Gear down...flaps up fyll load fuel and people 100 degree temps...sink rate was catastrophic...Probably pilot error. Gear goes up before the flaps
The RAT was plain to hear on the cellphone video posted by the BBC. I didn't know what the noise was. I thought maybe it was the noise of a bird strike damage turbofan.Saw the latest from Captain Steve today and the video we've been seeing. The original was a COPY video of a video. It's much clearer and he pointed out that it appears that the RAT deployed underneath the plane, meaning there was a major failure of electric, engines or hydraulics. This is a telling detail.
Flaps are usually operated using a screw jack setup. From the air disaster shows I've watched, it is easy to tell if the flaps were in a position set by the crew, or ended up where they are due to impact.Photos of the wreckage show the flaps deployed in takeoff position (Partial extension). When and how they were deployed TBD, but the "expert" said they were highly unlikely to have extended in the impact..
Back when the 737 Max debacle began, my financial advisor recommended Boeing stock. I flat-out told him no and not because of the recent crashes. I had experience with Boein, both in working on its "once-great" aircraft and knowing guys who worked at Boeing then. None of them had much good to say. The 737 Max was the tip of a sinking Titanic.Anyone saw the Boeing Documentary on Netflix?
When they went out of their way to make shareholders richer they lost their focus. The Boeing of today is just a shadow of what it was.
This is what happens when you let your company (Boeing) be taken over by the management of the failing company (McDonnell/Douglas) you are supposedly buying. One pundit described it as "McD took over Boeing using Boeing's money".However...
Without exception, Boeing managed to bungle EVERY. SINGLE. THING. - including their contract negotiations. And their stock made a tepid recovery at best. It was possibly one of my worst picks. I made enough on other stock purchases at that time to pay cash for my 2024 Chevy Silverado 2500HD - but Boeing wasn't any help at all!I sold every share I had last year and never looked back.