Really? I tried to get you the e-mail to the guy pictured and his SWAT team:
Wish I Could Carry A Revolver On Duty photo - Doug Wever photos at pbase.com Apparently they haven't gotten the word to ditch their revolvers, and I thought you could let them know they were endangering themselves because he looks pretty vulnerable to me too.
Peace
these things just lose the fun factor once they meet resistance.I wouldn't depend on a revolver for home defense these days. In my area the big thing is home invasion, anywhere from 3-5 guys heavily armed with pistols and AK's and you want to defend your family with a 5 or 6 shot revolver. Surrender isn't really an option they are there more for the rape and murder then money.
What can we shoot this thread with to make it die???![]()
If the Glock is so great, why is it that departments across the country have supplemented the shotguns with patrol rifles, i.e. AR15s? We never had to have those when we carried revolvers. And any Officer who leaves his shotgun in the car when he knows the S#%# is going to hit the fan doesn't need to be there to begin with.
Oh good Lord nogoodnamesleft.... Now you'll have sirrduke starting a thread asking which is better, throwing stars or blow darts for pinning bad guys against the wall....
I'm more of a wussy than all you tough guy 5-shots-is-all-I'll-ever-need guys.
Give me at least a dozen rounds and maybe I'll be able to defend myself. Shots to the head? Probably not. I'll have hands shaking, bowels quaking, knees knocking and mind blocking terror going on. My first 5 shots may be just to orient the barrel in the right direction....
That's why you need a C*** D-frame rather than a Smith J-frame.My first 5 shots may be just to orient the barrel in the right direction....
That's why you need a C*** D-frame rather than a Smith J-frame.
Oh good Lord nogoodnamesleft.... Now you'll have sirrduke starting a thread asking which is better, throwing stars or blow darts for pinning bad guys against the wall....![]()
It is a brand of handgun that some folks don't like to mention out loud in the presence of dedicated fans of S&W revolvers.I have no idea what a C*** is.
Anybody?![]()
The P47 was notoriously sluggish in dogfights due to its heavy armament which is why pilots preferred the P51. However, the P47 was good for attacking stationary targets.
I'm not sure the data supports that, but also you didn't give a specific measurement on "very short barrel." Even with +P the .357 comes out on top from a 2.5" snub, with standard .38 the difference is even more dramatic.
From a snub nose web site, the following velocities were published for a 2.5 inch snub nose. These are not muzzle velocities, but taken ten feet away.
Ammunition Average Velocity (ft/sec):
Federal .38 Special 129-grain Hydrashok +P: 846 ft/sec
Winchester .38 Special 158-grain LSWCHP +P: 858 ft/sec
Remington .357 Magnum 125-grain SJHP: 1243 ft/sec (1,450 ft/sec published by Remington and in an independent article, no doubt measured from a longer barrel).
Article conclusion: While neither [ammo] is at its best in the snub, the magnum is the more potent of the two.
aka the under 20 gun professional
I'll have hands shaking, bowels quaking, knees knocking and mind blocking terror going on.