The Ultimate Model 27 Thread!

Hi,
Your post is a few years old, so you may no longer have the 27-2 in the picture. If you have, I wondered how much play your cylinder has (sideways and front to back) and how much room there is between it and the barrel. I have one pretty much the same age (1975 I think) and well used. It appears to leak a lot of gas sideways. I'm suspecting the extractor to be somewhat worn giving too much play.
Would appreciate your help.
regards,
Robert
 
Hi,
Your post is a few years old, so you may no longer have the 27-2 in the picture. If you have, I wondered how much play your cylinder has (sideways and front to back) and how much room there is between it and the barrel. I have one pretty much the same age (1975 I think) and well used. It appears to leak a lot of gas sideways. I'm suspecting the extractor to be somewhat worn giving too much play.
Would appreciate your help.
regards,
Robert

Wow, Robert, there are over 350 posts in this thread going back almost 6 years. It would be helpful if you address your question to a specific member/poster, or ask a general question about acceptable cylinder/barrel gap and "sideways" (rotational?) play.

I just checked the cylinder gap on four of my S&Ws with a set of automobile feeler gauges:

15-8 .010 goes, .012 no go
19-3 .008 goes, .010 no go
28-2 .006 no go
29-2 .006 no go

Others will chime in and tell us what the factory spec is; I have no idea but you can see there is considerable variance in my specific firearms. Edit: I did a bit of research. Apparently, .010 is at the top end of acceptable gap, but still within factory specifications. Note that measuring should be done with the the hammer at full cock. And .006 was the smallest gauge I had so I don't know the actual measurement on the 28 or 29.

Get a set of gauges and check the gap on your revolver. Obviously, my 15-8 is a newer model and probably has more rounds fired than the other three. It was a police turn-in and shows significant wear. The 29 is probably 95%. The 28 was carried by a deputy sheriff for 20 years but also shows little wear and was probably not shot much.

As to sideways/rotational play, all four of my guns have some slight movement with the 15 having the most. I have no way to measure it accurately. Also, all four have a bit of front to back movement if pressure is applied to the cylinder and against the exposed end of the ejector rod.

Google Cylinder Gap and you'll get some good information

Don't know if this is helpful, but it's the best I've got. Here's one link:

Cylinder gap questions...... - THR
 
Last edited:
5" AND 6"

27-1's with their 'dress shoes' on...



f001d83ccff00ff6425cfda319362135.jpg
edeedb7f1a2d4a0a51519a33cd944bb3.jpg
 
Recently traded my sweet 4" blue, 27-2 + cash for a 6" mint blued Python.....and promptly missed my 27-2 the next day :(

Sold the Python a week later for a $600 profit and soon bought a 4" nickel 27-2......and a 3.5" blue Pre-27. Happy man! :cool:


pix463597106.jpg


pix328716936.jpg
 
Recently traded my sweet 4" blue, 27-2 + cash for a 6" mint blued Python.....and promptly missed my 27-2 the next day :(

Sold the Python a week later for a $600 profit and soon bought a 4" nickel 27-2......and a 3.5" blue Pre-27. Happy man! :cool:

WOW, that is doing some horse trading there! Great outcome to me!
 
What a great long running thread!
Here are a few I've been lucky enough to add since this thread was stated.

Sequentially numbered blue 5" pre 27's, one shipped in January 1951 and the other in February 1951. I got lucky when bought them almost two years apart.

IMG_3365_zps3b397401.jpg


IMG_3366_zps44ca9cd1.jpg


3.5" from September 1951

IMG_3675_zpsx9eanzot.jpg


6.5" that shipped with targets on March 3, 1955

IMG_3697_zps8uw9ijy9.jpg


IMG_3700_zps0bxjxblw.jpg


and my most recent addition - 8 3/8" which shipped in January 1956

IMG_3738_zpskstmozc7.jpg


IMG_3731_zpsmpczogy4.jpg
 
As usual I'm not worthy! But here are two I picked up in 2015. 1 pre 27 6" and its stubby brother Pre 27 3.5" . The 6" came with the target stocks and was sold to me by a relative at a good price. I probibly paid to much for the 3.5" but time will tell.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    83.2 KB · Views: 84
Back
Top