I have been using a Glock for EDC for several years now and have had no issues with it. That being said my new issued weapon (if the expected changes occur) will be an M&P40. So I have been thinking should I transition to an M&P9 for off duty as well? It would seem that carrying the same platform on and off duty would make sense but I have never done it before due to my current duty weapon being a POS. I was just curious what your opinions would be on my issue and if any of you have any high round count M&Ps that you can talk about or any issues that may have occured. Thanks
I unfortunately don't have a high enough round count on my M&P9 to give you an accurate idea of how reliable the gun is, but this guy does....
pistol-training.com Blog Archive M&P Endurance Test Ends
A very impressive torture test of sorts that showed Glock-like reliability. The most interesting part is that even after 60k+ rounds and a small hairline crack in the slide, the pistol still fired. It was deemed safe by S&W until their lawyers found out and made them call the test off. You can see the EXTREMELY limited amount of stoppages and malfunctions.
I am going to take a shot in the dark and guess you carried a Glock 19 (or G23). If so, the M&P9 fullsize is just the tiniest bit bigger than the G19, considered by many gunfighters and industry professionals to be the perfect size gun for concealed carry. The M&P9 is real close, its a tad longer because of the beavertail and a tad taller (although once you consider how Glock's mags stick out a bit, they are really the same height essentially). Even though the length is only a few hundreths of an inch longer (if i remember correctly; don't quote me) the barrel of the M&P is .25" longer, which has some major benefits.
You already understand the huge benefits of carrying the same gun that you train / work with, so I'm not going to go into details on that. I wouldn't second guess yourself though. The M&P series is gaining tons of respect by the big players in firearm training and has worked out almost all of its kinks. I would say its as good a time as any to get one and it is definately on par with Glock.
I will make 2 suggestions should you buy one. Look for a model with the "stepped" rear sites. These are used for racking the slide with one hand off a boot/belt buckle in the event the support hand is injured. They serve another purpose though.
There have been some improvements made to the M&Ps over the years. The most important of these are an improved ejector and an improved striker. The new strikers are MUCH more durable than the previous ones. The old ones are black and the new ones are stainless, if you want to verify. The "stepped" rear sight is the last upgrade to the M&P series, so it has all previous upgrades and is a quick visual way to identify models with all bugs fixed (not to mention one handed malfunction drill capability is a huge plus). The old sights were smooth and slanted.
If you want some information on how to tell the date the pistol was made to verify it has the improved extractor/striker, then send me an email. I could also send pics of the old vs new sights. The old strikers would break from very little dryfire and sometimes live fire. the new strikers are rated at 100k+ dryfires.
If you are looking for an off duty holster, may I suggest giving my company a consideration. I am currently working with a major magazine and law enforcement officers about getting my holsters into the hands of LEOs for off duty use, along with some mag pouches (AR and sidearm) for duty use. There are a lot of advantages to the kydex pancake design, and I think LEOs would greatly benifit. Just something to consider.
I don't think you can go wrong in anyway with the M&P. I would keep your eyes open for a new model to get the most bang for your buck. Also make sure to take advantage of the LEO discount. The LEO M&P9 also comes with 3 mags instead of the standard 2.
Just a heads up. Keep us posted!
Steve
Personal Security Systems
Supporting our Troops, LEO's, & Responsible Gun Owners