Thinnest minimalist J Frame Grips

This is my thinnest J frame grip. It is from a big grip maker, maybe Ahrends, Eagle, or the like. I forget. It is too small for me. Not in the regular carry rotation these days.

8a882792a180458f27f3b824f8652631.jpg

31a980e26dff87ea621162c3d414d711.jpg

1940f3c9b7cd158f005df1ae22bd4ff4.jpg

7ee2de04346d5c03e1afbb1b22a23f18.jpg
 
Sounds like you have the skill for custom grips if you have the time. Always room for a skilled maker.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Right now I am out of town on a job. I need a reminder when I get home. Although they pay me almost as much as I believe I am worth, I would rather be at home doing something in my own shop
 
What are the thinnest most minimalist J frame grip's available? Maybe a thin checkered aluminum??? Or wood if they can get that thin…

You could buy a set of originals and thin them out to your liking - then refinish with Tung Oil or similar. Since you would be removing wood and refinishing them anyway, they need not be in great shape. Should be relatively inexpensive.

NOTE: Personally, I'd not use thinner than original grips as those are pretty much the bare minimum you need to hold on to a J frame while shooting it with anything more than anemic 148 grain wad cutters. That said, for the price of a used set of grips and some sandpaper - give it a shot if that is your desire.
 
I tried a set of the previous mentioned Eagle Secret Service boot grips once. I found them to be too thin. Felt recoil was down right nasty. :mad:
Personally, I prefer wider grips to spread felt recoil over a larger area. The current factory rubber boot grip works fine for me. Its pretty much a copy of the old Uncle Mike's design.
OP might like the Eagles though.
 
Here's my 940-1 with both the Ergo grip and the Hogue Bantum grip. There wasn't much difference in the thickness of each, but I really didn't like the grip angle of the Ergo. If someone wants the Ergo, PM me and I'll send them to you to get them out of the house. I think they're still laying around here somewhere.

Unless you put some monster grip on a J-frame, isn't the thickest part of the gun the cylinder? OP, are you asking because you (or someone you're posting for) have very small hands?


 
You can go too thin. If concealment as well as a decent grip are concerns, it's hard to find anything better than standard factory wood stocks.
 
As mentioned the Barami Hip Grip is very thin. I've used one on a 2" 36. You can get them on EBay in black or white for as little as $10 new in package
 
What are the thinnest most minimalist J frame grip's available? Maybe a thin checkered aluminum??? Or wood if they can get that thin…

It seems to me that grip selection is always going involve some kind of compromise. I am guessing that your quest is to find the most concealable grip or stock is the question. I agree with rockquarry's assessment. I do have a set of the factory J-frame wood stocks, but I don't use them on my 38 & 357 J frame(s). They don't offer a certain amount of grip control as compared to Hogue's Rubberized Bantam Grip in my experience, albeit a compromise. I do have an extensive selection of j frames grips in my collection. But, it's Hogue's Bantam grip that surpasses them all. It's a bit of a shame that S&W no longer installing the Bantam's on the Airlite Ti models.

I digress. Lastly, I would give the S&W's wood stocks a try... and btw, they are of the old school design, not the modern wood grips.
 
Last edited:
Since you asked again...:)

You can try finding a very early set of J frame service stocks of the pre-war style (silver medallions), which are even thinner than Magna stocks.

You can also thin out J frame Magna stocks as mentioned in post # 11 above, but they won't wind up a lot less wide than the width of the stock screw.
 
Back
Top