Tom Cruise as Jack Reacher???

The problem isn't his acting, it's his stature. The only way he'll surprise me is if if he grows 12" and gains 100lbs. Then he might be able to pull it off.


The thing is..... You guys think that everyone has read the books and knows what the guy is supposed to look like.

I've never heard of the books and don't care to. So if the character is 5' 4" or 6" 4", I'll never know the difference.

And don't you know that the camera adds five pounds!:p:rolleyes:
 
My first thought on an actor for 'Jack Reacher' was Leiv Schreibler. Some of you will remember him playing 'Mr. Clark' in 'Sum of All Fears'.
When a friend told me that Cruise was to play 'Reacher', I thought he was just trying to ruin my day. When I learned he was serious, it did.

Liev Schreiber is an awesome actor. He was unforgettably intense as Laertes in the Ethan Hawke Hamlet. He did not occur to me for an action role, but now that you mention it, I'd vote for him.
 
I'm a long term Reacher creature and I'm appalled at Cruise in the role of Jack. I'm not even considering seeing the movie for that reason. I hope Lee Child was paid a lot for the rights and I hope he keeps writing Reacher novels. But Cruise? Nah.


X2 I don't plan to see it, either. The book is better, I know what Jack Reacher looks like and TC ain't gonna work.
 
Well, so far, not one person has said they think Tom Cruise should play Jack Reacher. I couldn't agree more with all of you. I've read all of Lee Child's Reacher books and there's just no way to stretch the imagination that far. No way!
 
I could well be the world's greatest Jack Reacher fan. But I would rather be struck deaf dumb and blind that sit through one sceen with that girly-man trying to portray my hero.

What a darn shame. After I read the first of these books (The Killing Floor) I started watching for a Jack Reacher movie. And after all the years of waiting...we get this. I hope it flops big time and someone else makes a Jack Reacher movie.
 
Well, not to drift, but if Tom Cruise can play Jack Reacher, who could play in a remake of "Walking Tall"? I'm not talking about the cheesy Rock remake either, I'm talking about the 1973 original with Joe Don Baker. They would need someone who was in their mid 20's to mid 30's to portray the real man correctly. I'm a big fan of the Buford Pusser story, since it happened within an hour of where I live, and I can't come up with ANYBODY who could fit the role if the movie was remade today to correctly reflect the events of the mid Sixties to the mid Seventies, when it all actually happened.
 
I think Lee Child may have either needed the bux or maybe got Hollywooded. I hope he's well off and keeps writing. I hope the movie flops and the rights either revert to Childs or go to some one/group that will respect the character. I have no intention of seeing the movie.
 
After seeing the promos for the new Las Vegas show, I think Dennis Quaid could be a good hero type. He plays the sheriff in the new show. But he isn't young. At one time, Glenn Ford should have had that role.

As for Lucas Davenport, the easy choice to play him is Thomas Gibson, the lead FBI agent in, "Criminal Minds." He's the right age, and the makeup people can fake the facial scar.

I'm writing my first novel, a detective thing. I needed to visualize my characters and have pretty much decided on a young Robert Redford sort as the detective. If it gets published and Hollywood calls, I'll tell them to look for someone like that. Alas, I don't know of any such actor. All of those with the right "presence "are too old.

Thomas Gibson could also play Stuart Haydon if David Lindsey ever sells movie rights. I did see the movie of his, "Mercy", and Petra Whatshername who played Nikita was good as Vickie Kittrie, but the movie was too PC and they filmed it in Canada, not in Houston, TX . The lead detective was a woman, not Haydon, another grave PC flaw. The Modesty Blaise movies and the TV show were really bad. They just weren't up to the excellent books or to the comic strip, which ran in about 53 countries. In the USA, only the Detroit Free Press ran the strip, which was too adult for most US "family values" readers. And I think they sometimes had to have the artist dress Modesty more, uh, modestly.

I think the political and personal orientation of many in Hollywood prevents them from casting correctly, in many roles. I think Richard Dreyfuss was particularly bad as the icthyologist in, "Jaws." I read the book and he was nothing like the character. But Redford and Streep were pretty good in, "Out of Africa." Redford really looked a lot like the real white hunter whom he portrayed. And Klaus Maria Brandauer was good as Baron von Blixen.
 
Last edited:
Someone posted that Audie Murphy, MH looked like a shoe salesman. I never got that impression. He could,have played a Westen preacher or a lawyer or politician. He did well enough in his roles, mostly as a detective or a Western hero.

And he was good in Stephen Crane's "The Red Badge of Courage." Lord knows he could relate to the feelings of the character. The Purple Heart was among his array of decorations.

No, he wasn't a large man. The USMC rejected him as too small and frail. The Army accepted him, but he had to insist on being assigned to a combat unit. Officers tried to be kind and get him other jobs, as he wasn't a big man.

But what he accomplished in battle would probably make generals and admiral rise when he entered a room.

As an actor, I thought he was pretty good. Not a giant in stature, but I bet that few would cross him, let alone threaten him. Good gosh, he had killed literally hundreds of men! A Net friend of mine says she thinks he suffered from PTSD and was likely to take firm action if he was pressured too much by a bully. I believe that.

He was, in fact, accused of shooting at a man who was at odds with him in Hollywood. The judge asked Murphy if he'd shot at the man. The hero replied that if he had, he'd have hit him. I bet he would have, too.

But if the late Murphy was about 35 now, he'd be perfect to play C.J. Box's Wyoming game warden, Joe Pickett. It's Audie that I see in my mind as Pickett when I turn Box's words into a mental movie as I read the books.
 
I've never cared much for Cruise or his ''religion'' but while I don't fault him as an actor, I also know how short he is. And granted, anything is possible in the movies (who knew how short Alan Ladd was?) for those that really care there may be some reasonable objections. I matters not to me, I won't see this flick to begin with.
 
My brother worked in Hollywood as a grip for 20 years. He says a lot of these guys stand on boxes. I met Kurt Russell once. Although you can find his height listed as tall as 5'11", based on the fact that my wife is 5'9" He's 5'7" - maybe. And that's being polite.

As far as Cruise, guys like movies about stuff that blows up, gals like movies with pretty faces. He's there for the women in the audience.
 
Anyone know which book they are using for the movie?

For those that haven't read the books, Reacher's size is an important of his character. It isn't about him being a big macho dude, it is more about him standing out in a crowd.

Having someone who is 5'7" play Reacher is like having having someone from Mississippi playing James Bond. It is just wrong.

I heard somewhere that Cruise was part of the group that purchased the Reacher rights.
 
I have read every one of the Jack Reacher books, and in fact have them all on my Kindle. I just finished Child's latest book, "A Wanted Man" and it is just awful...some of the books have been better than others, but this one is completely sub-par in every way, illogical and even boring. It is the only one of his books that I couldn't wait to finish reading, and in fact thought about not finishing. Coupled with the movie, I think Child has completely lost his way.

I don't care for Cruise personally, but I have enjoyed some of his movies...I liked Collateral, for example, an unusual role for him. There is just no justification for casting him as Jack Reacher, though...a central element of the character, and a predominant feature of every book, is the size and physicality of Jack Reacher. He dominates everyone he encounters with his size, and there is just no way that Cruise can portray that on-screen, unless all the other actors are Hobbits or Lilliputians.
 
I'm with Kanewpadle on this---I never heard of Reacher and could care less about his size.

As for Cruise, he's the producer of the film which is why it is probably being made in the first place, and the writer/director
is Christopher McQuarrie, who also wrote "Way of the Gun," "The Usual Suspects" and "Valkyrie." Anyone have major problems with those three movies?:)
 
Someone above asked which book this movie is supposedly based on. It is based on the book titled "One Shot". Child wrote several other JR books before that one and by the time he got to it his stories had begun to change slightly. His earlier books had a harder edge and a lot more action. As the series progressed he got a lot better and plot development and fleshing out characters but the action was noticeably minimized.

In my opinion there were better JR books available to make a movie out of. But since they are using the girly-man it doesn't matter. It will suck.
 
Wasn't Jack Reachers first case when he was about 13? Maybe that's the portion of his life the Tom Cruise is going to portray.
 
I havent read any of the books. Only what you guys said that he was 6ft 5"s tall, 220 and blond. Thats a perfect discription of what my dad was. I have known a few very short men that carried themselves so well and had a demeaner that you never thought of them being short.
I worked for a short while in the studios. Many actors were shorter than they appeared on screen. On the other hand james arness looked even taller off screen to me than he did on! I can relate to the angle of reacher standing out for the script because of his size for the plot.
People now days are taller than they were a generation ago. My dad would be a hundred next year. I dont think one man in 500 appeared as big as him when I was a kid. Today he wouldnt stand out as much.
Because he did stand out it seemed to me dad worked at not standing out. He was very queit and unassumeing. He would be the last to unboard a airliner or train when I would pick him up. Was this guy jack reader like that? Now I have to buy the book!
 
I have more respect for Cruise than some here do. I understand that he paid the hospital bill for a lady who was struck by a car, although he wasn't involved in the accident.

He also bought and flies a P-51 Mustang, and was adamant that the RAF planes strafing a German column in, "Valkerie" be authentic. They used real P-40's. That impressed me. I also liked the way that he cocked his PPK one-handed in that movie.
(His character lost an arm in that air attack in North Africa.)

I was also impressed more than I expected to be when I read his recent interview in, "Playboy." I skip most of their interviews these days, but he intrigued me. I heard Katie tell an interviewer just before she left Tom that he does his own stunts, sometimes hundreds of feet in the air. He has stones of steel. But he is short, not right for Jack Reacher.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top