Triggers

squiggy

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
31
Reaction score
16
Location
Olympia WA
What trigger do you folks prefer for double action shooting? I used to use the narrow trigger with groves, because that is what ole Jerry Miculek said he used. When I sent my M629 into Clark Custom they ground off my grooves, and polished her smooth. I am not sure if I like it. I shot my dad's M29 over the weekend. It has a wide trigger with grooves. I shot pretty good with it, but I could have just been having a good day. Tomorrow my M66-1 will be returning from Clark Custom with a trigger job matching my M629. I will be interested in seeing how long it takes me to get used to shooting it double action. What do y'all like, and why?
 
Register to hide this ad
I was really not a fan of grinding the grooves from a standard trigger. To me it shortened it front to back. So, I developed a callus on my trigger finger shooting standard triggers, and there is a hint of it still there.

But, I discovered the .312 smooth trigger that I like best of all the triggers. I have changed out several .400 grooved and smooth target triggers for the .312 smooth trigger.

I tend to leave the original triggers in guns I don't shoot often. I do not shoot much double action with the wide target triggers.
 
Medium width smooth triggers are the predominant choice for double action shooting in IDPA, USPSA, ICORE, and PPC. I have no direct experience in any other revolver sport shooting double action. After shooting my model 60 in IDPA BUG, I ground the grooves on the trigger myself.
 
I have a smith polish and radius the trigger face on any revolver I buy. I really don't like grooved triggers. The difference in thickness is insignificant to me.
 
Double action is my primary. The revolvers I shoot the most are Centennials (940, M&P 340 and 640 Pro). They have the wider, smooth trigger, and I've gotten used to them.

If I had my way, they'd all have the old style grooved target triggers like my Model 31. A friend gave me the matching target hammer -- I like the looks, but I rarely shoot single action so it's a wash, functionally.

Why, you asked. I have big mitts, but I like I and J-frame guns. The grooved target trigger gives my long trigger finger something to "grip". It simply feels more stable. Pretty simple.
 

Attachments

  • Mod. 31 cocked.jpg
    Mod. 31 cocked.jpg
    104.2 KB · Views: 33
I have a smith polish and radius the trigger face on any revolver I buy. I really don't like grooved triggers. The difference in thickness is insignificant to me.

What he said except I do them myself and just on those revolvers that are intended primarily for DA use. If it's something that might have it's value affected, I usually just install a spare medium to narrow width trigger. For defensive weapons, I leave things as stock as possible....
 
Narrow-smooth. Letting my trigger finger slide a little across the face of the trigger helps me maintain a constant motion with a straight-back pull. A narrow width fits in the area around my distal joint better.

My 642s have stock triggers that work for me, as did a 2" 64 that I had. I used to have a 3" 65 and I did have its trigger radiused and polished; it worked very nicely for me.
 
Last edited:
Double action shooting....Smooth, working the trigger back and forth, quickly and smoothly is easier and not as abrasive on the trigger finger .

Single Action, as in slow fire , deliberate long range target shooting , then the grooved trigger gets my vote. For target shooting I even install a wider grooved trigger shoe like those made by Tyler Mfg.

After doing a lot of DA shooting the grooved trigger start to chew into the soft finger parts....If you don't like the smooth trigger ...the grooved trigger shoes are still available.
Gary
 
I've found Smith grooved triggers to
vary a lot in the sharpness of the ridges.

If very sharp, I'll give the trigger a touch
up with the Dremel.

However I won't touch the wide target
triggers. Back in the day, used to smooth
them and round them down. Now just
do a little slow fire with them.

Overall, I do prefer the smooth trigger and
when Smith started introducing them in 1982
as a regular feature I wasn't unhappy about it.
 
I prefer a smooth trigger on my revolvers, if i decide to keep my 65-2 it will have the trigger swapped out with a smooth faced one.
 
Grooved for me, since learning to shoot with just the pad of my trigger finger. Keeps the finger in the same place.

Hard to find nowadays. I may have to buy a 625JM just to get one.
 
The .312" smooth combat trigger is my favorite. I swapped out the (grooved) target trigger in my 27-2 for a (smooth) combat trigger and like it much better in this format.

 
Back
Top