The pistol has a lot of shortcomings - underpowered cartridge, difficult reloading, and a grip more suited to small-handed people (imagine that). But it isn't the abomination that has been dutifully repeated by gun scribes with little critical analysis since the 1950's.
Buck
That Nambu may be a real tack driver.
Scorpio's P38 in Dirty Harry was a contender.
The Cobray M-12 right is right up there.
I thought about Nagant revolvers with their quirky steampunk sort of look, but couldn't *really* call them ugly in a Glock sort of way.
And, fwiw, the Dardick is sort of out there --
http://blog.modernmechanix.com/mags/qf/c/MechanixIllustrated/8-1957/this_gun/med_this_gun_0.jpg
But those Nambus are just like a bad spider, not very pretty to look at with a sneaky bite when you least expect it.
+1 for the Rhino.The S&W 327 IL snubbie with the very short, sleeved barrel.....or the Chiappa Rhino. Too close to call, for me. Regards 18DAI.
Remember that pressure on the exposed sear will cause that puppy to fire. You probably know this, but I'd hate to leave it unsaid and something bad happen.
You haven't seen ugly until you've encountered this one. I picked it up at a gun show today, mostly because I've wanted to write an article about it for some time. Not that I'll ever shoot it; it's probably just as dangerous to the shooter as to anything or anyone in front of it.
It's a Type 94 Nambu, made in September, 1941 by the Nambu Rifle Mfg. Co. in Japan, under Nagoya Arsenal supervision. About 71,000 were made before and during WWII from 1935 to 1945.
Surprisingly, the Japanese were going to supplant and then replace their adequate Type 14 Nambus with this monstrosity. It was designed to be cheaper to manufacture than the Type 14, but wound up costing more. Sounds a lot like our government in recent years, doesn't it?
At any rate, feast your eyes on this baby...uuuggglllyyy! Now go rinse your eyes.
John
![]()
Here's a T14 from 1931. Not quite as ugly as the OP but still showing definite German influence.
![]()