brendonjames65
US Veteran
I wanted to start this thread because I see this often. A seller of a gun has an optimistic view regarding the value of their gun when it has visible damage to the finish. I believe there are categories to this and I offer my subjective opinion.
Honest wear- Nothing wrong with this (IMO). As long as there is no corrosion/pitting, marring, etc… the owner may have put many miles on the gun with finish wear, but it's been well maintained, no rust, pitting and in excellent operating condition. Normal holster wear on the muzzle crown, cylinder and perhaps other areas depending on the gun type.
Pitting, corrosion (visible rust), marring, etc…. Not normal wear. Honestly, I find this to be unacceptable. It tells me that the owner did not properly maintain this gun and is a red flag to me, and I will automatically bypass if it's for sale unless I feel a restoration or refinish may be in order due to the rarity of the gun but I'd want a substantial reduction in the asking price.
I never had a weapon in my possession rust in either my service in the marines, my 25 years in law enforcement, or a lifetime of hunting including many backcountry and a couple wilderness pack trip hunts. Bottom line to me, if there is a visible flaw to the finish, not normal wear but due to negligence and the seller can't or won't correct it prior to listing for sale, they should expect a substantially reduced offer but many get offended!?
Just curious if fellow forum members have a similar view.
Honest wear- Nothing wrong with this (IMO). As long as there is no corrosion/pitting, marring, etc… the owner may have put many miles on the gun with finish wear, but it's been well maintained, no rust, pitting and in excellent operating condition. Normal holster wear on the muzzle crown, cylinder and perhaps other areas depending on the gun type.
Pitting, corrosion (visible rust), marring, etc…. Not normal wear. Honestly, I find this to be unacceptable. It tells me that the owner did not properly maintain this gun and is a red flag to me, and I will automatically bypass if it's for sale unless I feel a restoration or refinish may be in order due to the rarity of the gun but I'd want a substantial reduction in the asking price.
I never had a weapon in my possession rust in either my service in the marines, my 25 years in law enforcement, or a lifetime of hunting including many backcountry and a couple wilderness pack trip hunts. Bottom line to me, if there is a visible flaw to the finish, not normal wear but due to negligence and the seller can't or won't correct it prior to listing for sale, they should expect a substantially reduced offer but many get offended!?
Just curious if fellow forum members have a similar view.