wbraswell
Member
Yesterday, I went into Sam's, and strolled down the book aisle. I find "Small Arms Visual Encyclopedia", and flip through a couple of pages,(I don't have my glasses}. Looks cool enough, lots of pics about guns all over the globe, so I get it. Don't blow $15 on this rag! I have found so many mistakes about the few guns I know about, that I can't trust any of the info about the ones I don't know. Here are just a few that hit me in the face the first time through. A big double page, titled "Smith & Wesson Model 10", and the short 2 paragraphs are accurate, but the picture is a break open .38 DA. The spec. chart says 5 shot and range 20 meters. A #3 American called a double action .38, the illustration is a SA. A .44 Russian with the correct backstrap knuckle, but square butt, and no "hook" on the trigger guard. The .357 Magnum shows an illustration that looks like a colored version of the old factory brochures,except no grip checkering, but it's the same one used later in the book for the Model 29, which they call a combat revolver. It shows an old pic of our doughboys, that they say are the first ones in England, with their 1903 Springfields stacked in front of them. They're Krags!. On a page of Winchester lever guns, they have a part about the 1886, but the pic is of a 1866, and they don't even talk about the 1876. Where they write about the Meiji type 26 Japanese revolver, the pic is obviously a Colt New Service. They say the Police Positive was a .22, the New Service had a model with a 1.6" barrel with no front sight. They call the 1911 an "Ace" and the pic looks like a late model Gold Cup. I bought this book for knowledge, but all I learned is that I can't trust anything in this book. Although the "illustration" of a Gatling gun mounted on a camel is worth a couple of bucks.