SCSW4 lists 11.3 oz for the 1999 version, 12 oz for this model with UM boot grip, and 10.8 oz eek for the PD variant with Hogue Bantam grip. My 342Ti is a later model, bought used with the S&W boot grip knockoff. Don't have a scale to measure this beast, but, yes, it IS a handful. This may not make sense but firing this gun is more painful than firing my M&P 340 with .357 ammunition. Hope this helps.
Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
P.S. Almost forgot: must be careful with this model. Bullets can become unseated under recoil and move forward in the cylinder.
Thanks. Mas Ayoob recommended 148gr wad cutters both for self defense and light recoil in light revolvers like the 342ti and the Ruger LCR.
Sounds good to me.
That's the problem with these 'flyweights.' You have to test several loads to avoid the dreaded "bullet creep." I have a 342Ti and a 337Ti. Each required a different load for problem-free functioning. You'd think the round OK in one would be suitable in the other. Nope.
All of this is silly. Hell no to bullet jump in a 38 special Airlite. I shoot Buffalo Bore 125 and 158 full power load .357's in a 11.5oz 340 with no problems. Did have some crimp jump with Georgia Arms loads but that has been the only one. Never from any major factory brand ammo. (Fed, Rem, Win, Horn) I don't think you have anything to worry about in a .38 version. Hell, Shoot it to find out. I wouldn't have a worry at all.
Quickdraw, I don't notice the 317 being particularly different to shoot, compared to regular Airweights. But I do see that with the Airweights I'm just as accurate DA as SA... with the 317 I'm slightly better SA. Maybe that's where it shows?