Bill_in_fl
Member
In some of my threads regarding my snubby 1917 S&W project revolver as well as my other full length barrel 1917 S&W revolvers, both here and at another firearms forum, some people have suggested I put Tyler T grip adapters on my grips.
I'm wondering exactly how the Tyler T grip would aid my hand grip on my revolver. I have big hands. Thin grips do not work well in filling my hands and I also need a long grip to avoid my pinky finger from slipping off the bottom of the grip. If my pinky finger won't stay on the grip, I won't buy a handgun like that.
In looking at the Tyler T grips, it strikes me that they may do two things that are not advantageous to a better grip....at least for me and other shooters like me that have big hands.
Using the Jay Scott extra depth width fake stag horn with laminated wood grips, they fill my hands better than any other double action revolver grip does. I don't want the looks of a target grip, and I like the old school "magna" type looks of the extra wide Jay Scott grips which very adequately fill my hands due to their extra depth width. When I grip my Jay Scott grips, the middle knuckle of my middle finger is indeed pushed up tightly against the rear of the trigger guard.
But that does not cause me a problem because my knuckle is tight against the rear of the trigger guard and rides back with the recoil instead of getting pounded. This is because my knuckle is ALREADY tightly against the rear of the trigger guard and not a fraction away from it. Kind of like a rifle stock being tight against the shoulder and riding the recoil rather than the rifle stock being held loose against the shoulder where it then pounds the shoulder under recoil. I just fired two moon clips (12 cartridges) out of my matte finish S&W 1917 for my first time shooting it yesterday to see how it would operate. Everything operated perfectly and no problems with my middle knuckle of my middle finger being pounded.
So there are two factors regarding these Tyler T grips that I don't understand that I hope someone can elaborate upon to help me understand how they might aid my large hands grip.
1. If my middle knuckle of my middle finger without a Tyler T grip is already tight against the rear of the trigger guard, what advantage does the Tyler T grip do for me besides taking up more space to drive my knuckle even further forward and downward?
2. I notice that the Tyler T grip takes up space and forces the shooter's fingers further downward on the revolver, thus driving the pinky finger off the bottom of the grip for large handed shooters.
See these below pics. First my newest mattel nickel S&W 1917 revolver with extra depth width, fake stag, plastic on wood laminated, Jay Scott grips, without a Tyler T grip. These extra wide depth laminated grips very adequately fill my hands unlike some thinner depth magna style grips do, and most importantly, they still allow my pinky finger to wrap around the grip and not be forced off the bottom of the grip. I have the exact same numbered extra depth width Jay Scott grips on two of my S&W 1917's now. I was lucky to recently find at Sarco the exact set of extra width Jay Scott new old stock grips still sealed in the original package from the 1960's that I already had on my commercial model blue S&W 1917 revolver, and those are the ones on my matte nickel 1917...
Here's the EXACT same model number set of extra width, fake stag with wood laminate Jay Scott grips on my commercial blue S&W 1917 that I also now have on my matte nickel 1917. These are just a little more yellowed and worn from age....
See how much extra depth width these particular Jay Scott grips have than another magna style set of grips have.....
Now compare how much more large hand filling, these wider extra width depth, Jay Scott grips are than another aftermarket magna style grip are. Jay Scott extra width depth grips on the right compared to the thinner depth width grips on the left.....
Next another 1917 snubby barrel N frame S&W revolver with the Tyler T grip adapter installed.....
See how in the above pic the Tyler T grip adapter by its taking up space, not only forces the middle knuckle of the middle finger MORE forward, but also forces ALL of the fingers more DOWNWARD, thus forcing the pinky finger off the bottom of the grip for some large handed shooters.
So here is my overall impression and please someone explain to me how I might be in error, if it appears I am.
It is my impression that the Tyler T grip seeks to give a better hand filling grip by making the length of the grip longer rather than making the depth of the grip wider as my Jay Scott grips do. By the Tyler T grip doing that, it appears to me to not only drive the knuckle of the middle finger more forward, but also drives that knuckle and indeed drives all the fingers more downward, thus driving the pinky finger either almost, or totally off the bottom of the grip for large handed shooters.
I simply do not see any advantage for large handed, long fingered shooters to use the Tyler T grip. Am I missing something here?
.
I'm wondering exactly how the Tyler T grip would aid my hand grip on my revolver. I have big hands. Thin grips do not work well in filling my hands and I also need a long grip to avoid my pinky finger from slipping off the bottom of the grip. If my pinky finger won't stay on the grip, I won't buy a handgun like that.
In looking at the Tyler T grips, it strikes me that they may do two things that are not advantageous to a better grip....at least for me and other shooters like me that have big hands.
Using the Jay Scott extra depth width fake stag horn with laminated wood grips, they fill my hands better than any other double action revolver grip does. I don't want the looks of a target grip, and I like the old school "magna" type looks of the extra wide Jay Scott grips which very adequately fill my hands due to their extra depth width. When I grip my Jay Scott grips, the middle knuckle of my middle finger is indeed pushed up tightly against the rear of the trigger guard.
But that does not cause me a problem because my knuckle is tight against the rear of the trigger guard and rides back with the recoil instead of getting pounded. This is because my knuckle is ALREADY tightly against the rear of the trigger guard and not a fraction away from it. Kind of like a rifle stock being tight against the shoulder and riding the recoil rather than the rifle stock being held loose against the shoulder where it then pounds the shoulder under recoil. I just fired two moon clips (12 cartridges) out of my matte finish S&W 1917 for my first time shooting it yesterday to see how it would operate. Everything operated perfectly and no problems with my middle knuckle of my middle finger being pounded.
So there are two factors regarding these Tyler T grips that I don't understand that I hope someone can elaborate upon to help me understand how they might aid my large hands grip.
1. If my middle knuckle of my middle finger without a Tyler T grip is already tight against the rear of the trigger guard, what advantage does the Tyler T grip do for me besides taking up more space to drive my knuckle even further forward and downward?
2. I notice that the Tyler T grip takes up space and forces the shooter's fingers further downward on the revolver, thus driving the pinky finger off the bottom of the grip for large handed shooters.
See these below pics. First my newest mattel nickel S&W 1917 revolver with extra depth width, fake stag, plastic on wood laminated, Jay Scott grips, without a Tyler T grip. These extra wide depth laminated grips very adequately fill my hands unlike some thinner depth magna style grips do, and most importantly, they still allow my pinky finger to wrap around the grip and not be forced off the bottom of the grip. I have the exact same numbered extra depth width Jay Scott grips on two of my S&W 1917's now. I was lucky to recently find at Sarco the exact set of extra width Jay Scott new old stock grips still sealed in the original package from the 1960's that I already had on my commercial model blue S&W 1917 revolver, and those are the ones on my matte nickel 1917...

Here's the EXACT same model number set of extra width, fake stag with wood laminate Jay Scott grips on my commercial blue S&W 1917 that I also now have on my matte nickel 1917. These are just a little more yellowed and worn from age....

See how much extra depth width these particular Jay Scott grips have than another magna style set of grips have.....


Now compare how much more large hand filling, these wider extra width depth, Jay Scott grips are than another aftermarket magna style grip are. Jay Scott extra width depth grips on the right compared to the thinner depth width grips on the left.....

Next another 1917 snubby barrel N frame S&W revolver with the Tyler T grip adapter installed.....

See how in the above pic the Tyler T grip adapter by its taking up space, not only forces the middle knuckle of the middle finger MORE forward, but also forces ALL of the fingers more DOWNWARD, thus forcing the pinky finger off the bottom of the grip for some large handed shooters.
So here is my overall impression and please someone explain to me how I might be in error, if it appears I am.
It is my impression that the Tyler T grip seeks to give a better hand filling grip by making the length of the grip longer rather than making the depth of the grip wider as my Jay Scott grips do. By the Tyler T grip doing that, it appears to me to not only drive the knuckle of the middle finger more forward, but also drives that knuckle and indeed drives all the fingers more downward, thus driving the pinky finger either almost, or totally off the bottom of the grip for large handed shooters.
I simply do not see any advantage for large handed, long fingered shooters to use the Tyler T grip. Am I missing something here?
.
Last edited: