Okie- yes, I have a few of those in my box of Glock mags as well. More .40 than anything as that was the most popular LE caliber.
Have a bunch of those. My carry gun is a 2003 (ban era) G19 and the mag I'm still using in it is LE restrictedI think this is a relic from that era.![]()
I think this is a relic from that era.![]()
The only Glock magazines that I remember going that high were for the Model 20 10mm. Galil .308 magazines went even higher. On the good side the zillions of Browning High Power magazines around the planet were pre-ban and could be sold as surplus to importers so they remained affordable.
There was an enormous gun buying splurge in anticipation of a worse ban followed by a drastic collapse in gun sales after the ban took effect. Predictably that repeated before and after the last election.
As a consequence of their push for gun control the Democrats were slaughtered in the 1994 mid term election. Predictably that also repeated in the last election. That is the one thing that will convince some of our neighbors that passing more restrictive gun laws in not in their best interest.
At the time I already had a wonderful M1A and, at the time, I was not in the market for an AR or any similar milspec weapon. However, I did buy a number of 20 round magazines for my M1A, I think they were 45 dollars apiece before the ban. The only high capacity pistol I owned was a Ruger P-89. A huge thing!!! A friend of mine wanted it and around the time he wanted it I found a S&W 5903 SSV that I really liked so I sold him the Ruger and bought the S&W. Bought additional hi-cap magazines for it, too.
To this very day that 5903 SSV is still a safe queen, my only unfired weapon.
I will never forget Bill Clinton telling Congress that if they passed "the Brady Bill, I'll sure sign it."![]()
I remember it like it was yesterday. Mainly because MASS still has it in effect.
The sad part is that banning a firearm based on a couple of superficial features still makes no sense some 23 years later.
Nor has it had an effect on gun violence. Legislators can be notoriously slow learners.
Well, one thing that has not been mentioned, so far, is what happened to all of the F.F.L. holders. Me included. I was a "gunsmith", and was trying to do things right. Log in, log out. I was working out of my home. That was not acceptable. I was treated just like a firearms seller. I dug my feet in for a while, but after too many very threatening letters, I gave up and just sent in by bound book. Even though I explained what I was doing, I was required to show a "store front" sign, and all of the security systems I had. The pictures of my house and my wolf dog was not good enough.
Well, one thing that has not been mentioned, so far, is what happened to all of the F.F.L. holders.
Yep. Reading this thread doesn't bring back any memories for me because this is still our pathetic reality today.I remember it like it was yesterday. Mainly because MASS still has it in effect.
The sad part is that banning a firearm based on a couple of superficial features still makes no sense some 23 years later. Nor has it had an effect on gun violence. Legislators can be notoriously slow learners.
Some of us still think that way.Think of how many folks bought pistols chambered in 45ACP thinking that if I can have only ten, then let's make them big ones!