What "New Gun Legislation" is being proposed?

Joined
Feb 1, 2011
Messages
6,859
Reaction score
17,178
Location
PRNJ
This is not bait for political rants.

What besides universal NICS checks is being proposed in the name of "stricter gun control."
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Maybe I'll get dinged for this, but I do believe it is a legitimate item for a 2nd Amendment discussion:

I guess it wasn't a "proposal" in the strictest sense, but the President of the United States just suggested that we should adopt gun control laws similar to those in Australia and Great Britain.

His words:

"We know that other countries, in response to one mass shooting, have been able to craft laws that almost eliminate mass shootings," the president said. "Friends of ours, allies of ours — Great Britain, Australia, countries like ours. So we know there are ways to prevent it."

This is very disturbing to me.
 
Aussies and Brits guns were consficated and destroyed.
Gun laws here serve no other purpose than to make felons out of law abiding gun owners.
Just an empty mag in common sense gun law states will get you hard time.
And the administration releases bad guys.
This is not a political rant.
It is the truth.
Jim
 
Hillary proposes to do away with the law protecting the gun manufactures from lawsuits filed by people effected by gun violence if elected.

Bernie Sanders said on CNN, Now… if somebody has a gun, and it falls into the hands of a murderer, and that murderer kills somebody with the gun, do you hold the gun manufacturer responsible? Not any more than you would hold a hammer company responsible if somebody beats somebody over the head with a hammer. That is not what a lawsuit should be about.
 
Last edited:
Our federal government can't get a handle on 12 million "undocumented immigrants", how do they think they will get a handle on 300 million firearms? While I do believe there is some sincere emotion expressed, I do agree that most of it is bluster for the party bases.
 
"What besides universal NICS checks is being proposed in the name of "stricter gun control." "

My guess is that a tactic high on someone's list will be to shut down NICS indefinitely on some phony pretext - such as it needs more study in light of the Oregon Massacre, etc. to see if it can be improved. No NICS = No legal gun sales.
 
Hillary proposes to do away with the law protecting the gun manufactures from lawsuits filed by people effected by gun violence if elected.

Bernie Sanders said on CNN, Now… if somebody has a gun, and it falls into the hands of a murderer, and that murderer kills somebody with the gun, do you hold the gun manufacturer responsible? Not any more than you would hold a hammer company responsible if somebody beats somebody over the head with a hammer. That is not what a lawsuit should be about.[/QUOTE

At least some of them are gun owners. Even NRA members. That's what really gets Hillary hot.
 
Last edited:
[...] What besides universal NICS checks is being proposed in the name of "stricter gun control."

We can hope nothing new will pass at the federal level because older legislators have not forgotten 1994 and younger ones saw how the post Sandy Hook gun control push influenced the last election.

New local laws are a more immediate concern. Claiming it falls under their taxing authority and there fore does not defy Washington State's preemption of gun laws the Seattle City Council just passed a 5 cent per "bullet" tax. NPR's hosts are advocating high taxes on "bullets." They were proposing $7 to $8 per "bullet." I've not heard them say anything that indicates they know the difference between a bullet or a cartridge and I have not looked up whether Seattle's tax hits reloaders. Seattle's new law also adds a $25 tax on gun sales but that is not as important as taxing .22 LR.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top