What's in your defensive 1911... FMJ or JHP?

What do you run in your defensive 1911?

  • FMJ

    Votes: 18 14.9%
  • JHP

    Votes: 92 76.0%
  • Other (elaborate)

    Votes: 11 9.1%

  • Total voters
    121

MrJT

US Veteran
Joined
Apr 27, 2009
Messages
534
Reaction score
419
Location
Scranton PA
I've been doing a lot of research into a 1911 purchase.

I have personally experienced feeding issues with JHP in two 1911s I've tried recently. With some research I've seen this is somewhat common.

I also have seen that a lot of people run FMJ in their 1911s.

So out of curiosity, what do you choose to load in your 1911?

FMJ or JHP?
 
Register to hide this ad
I've been doing a lot of research into a 1911 purchase. I have personally experienced feeding issues with JHP in two 1911s I've tried recently.

I'd be curious to know which brands of 1911.

I've never experienced that problem, but some 1911s do need a bit of polishing on the feed ramp.

And you're talking about feeding problems, specifically, right? Not ejection problems, not a stovepipe problem?

And frankly, it may not be the pistol's fault. Some JHP ammo seems to be more aggressively (for lack of a better word) hollow pointed than others. One brand might fail to feed, while another has no problems at all.

Speaking for myself, I wouldn't let any prior feeding problems stop me from buying a 1911 if I wanted another one. They're great pistols with a long history.
 
My Series 70, Combat Commander and RIA Compact carry Federal 230 gr HPs. I've shot a few in each pistol (those things are expensive!) but all three pistols also feed 180 gr cast SWCs for practice, so I'm pretty sure they'll feed JHPs.
 
ALL my defensive firearms are loaded with JHP. In most cases it's Hornady Critical Defense (or Critical Duty). No issues.
 
I carry NOTHING but hollowpoints, JHPs for 9x19mm, 40S&W and .45acp, and lead HP-SWC in .38/.357.

I don't have an unlimited pot of public money to pay off judgments from through and throughs.
 
You really can't generalize. There are so many different versions from various manufacturers out there now that any general statement about "THE 1911" is pretty meaningless.

During most of the 1911 design's prime time, ball was king with autoloaders because all brands had issues with hollow points. That's how people like Bill Wilson got into the business of making 1911's more reliable.

These days, a lot of companies like Kimber, Springfield and Smith&Wesson build features originally developed by the "customizers" into their off-the-shelf pistols.

FMJ ball .45 was king when all other pistol calibers used ball, too. Fish stories from the old days non-withstanding, there is no evidence I'm aware of that it's a particularly effective self-defense round compared to modern JHP designs in any other caliber.

When I still carried 1911's, I loaded them with Black Talons and later Federal Hydrashoks. It would not have occurred to me to depend for my life on a gun that could only be trusted with FMJ. So my recommendation would be (and of course it's my opinion only), if you want to use the 1911 for self defense and/or carry, buy a 1911 model that can handle JHP, and test it with the best ammo you want to carry until you're sure it does.
 
230gr HSTs in my Sig Carry Nightmare.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • SigwChip.jpg
    SigwChip.jpg
    50.1 KB · Views: 494
230g Remington Golden Saber JHP for carry in my 1943 mfg Remington Rand 1911. It is the closest profile to FMJ, and is 100% reliable for me. It also works in my other 1911 .45s, so I use that in all.

FMJ is the preferred round, but with today's environment, it is my range ammo, may be home defense, but never CC.
 
My SA range officer compact that I carry every day is loaded gold dots. The Colt GM setting my desk in front of me is loaded with hst. The SA xdm is loaded with with Ranger T. The SA Loaded is loaded with fmj hand loads and the Colt GCNM is not loaded.
 
When I carry a 1911 concealed for self defense, its usually a Kimber Ultra 3 inch shorty, loaded with 230 grain Winchester Ranger bonded. Reliable, and they show good expansion. What's not to like?

Larry
 
200gr FMJ hardball ammo. Stopping threats since 1911.

Rastoff, that's not quite correct - I think it's 230 grain FMJ hardball - and that's milspec ammo and the Geneva convention rules - or Hague convention - I can't recall, mostly because I don't care - but you don't need to be sending that kind of ammo at your perpetrating opponent who has who knows what behind him in terms of innocent bystanders. Or hasa drywall behind him and a baby's room is next. You want expanding ammunition.

If I carried a 1911, which I surely will not, I'd be using Remington Golden Saber or something along those lines. My CS-45 likes that ammo. It likes 230 grain hardball, too, but I only use that at the range.
 
I haven't carried my only 1911, Series 70 Colt Government model, for
many years now. Back when I bought it in the 70s I used to carry it
some but mostly in open carry when outdoors. Like many 1911s it
had a few feed failures when new and tight. It worked much better
after some break in rounds and polishing the feed ramp and barrel
throat. It is very reliable now but the only ammo I ever carried with
and will carry with is 230 gr FMJ.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top